To listen to the current podcast in your browser, click here
Turns out that my iTunes Music Store subscription isn't updating, so I tried re-posting. Still doesn't seem to be working for me, but hopefully you've been able to download the podcast in your iTunes subscription list. If not, you can find the Podcast here to listen to it through iTunes.
Links referenced in the show (Lucky #13):
Google: Halloween vegan
OneWorld.net: Five Cities in Croatia Ban Animal Circus Performances
SouthofBoston.com | The Enterprise: Crackdown on cats by Randolph board draws criticism
Wisconsin State Journal: Wild pigs should go out with a bang
The Independent: Eggs: Battery or free range?
The higher-quality AAC version of the podcast.
Monday, October 31, 2005
AAFL Podcast for Halloween 2005
Posted by Eric @ 5:12 PM
Australia Uses New Methods to Protect Whales
Posted by Eric @ 10:18 AM
Planet Ark: Australia Uses New Methods to Protect Whales
When people challenge AR activists as anti-science and technology for wanting to end animal exploitation, they don't take into account that many animal activists see technology and science as part of the solution. Here's a good example of technology resulting in a reduction of animal cruelty (excerpt):
When people challenge AR activists as anti-science and technology for wanting to end animal exploitation, they don't take into account that many animal activists see technology and science as part of the solution. Here's a good example of technology resulting in a reduction of animal cruelty (excerpt):
Fierce whale-hunting opponent Australia said on Friday it was expanding the use of satellite and DNA technology to track and research whales as it seeks to overturn the killing of whales for scientific purposes
Government scientists said the new methods, which use a crossbow and floating dart to tag whales and take a small skin sample, would allow scientists to study stock distribution, the biology and age of whales without killing them.
"Experience has shown that it is not necessary to kill whales to learn about them and this whale tagging programme is an important part of our non-lethal research programme," Environment Minister Ian Campbell said.
Divisions between pro- and anti-whaling countries over the issue of scientific research have deepened in recent years.
Countries are able to hunt whales for scientific purposes under a loophole in the founding constitution of the International Whaling Commission (IWC).
Australia led a narrow defeat at the IWC's annual meeting in June of Japanese-backed proposals to extend whaling limits, but the issue will again be high on the agenda at the commission's next meeting in the Caribbean in 2006.
Sunday, October 30, 2005
Don't Forget: World Vegan Day is November 1st!
Posted by Eric @ 1:00 PM
World Vegan Day is a great day to celebrate your animal-friendly lifestyle and, if not vegan yet, could be a good time to learn more about it and start giving it a try!
Find out what's going on near you.
Find out what's going on near you.
Saturday, October 29, 2005
Police probe hunt monitor assault
Posted by Eric @ 5:27 PM
BBC NEWS | UK | England | Devon: Police probe hunt monitor assault
Police are investigating an assault on Kevin Hill, who was monitoring the welfare of a stag during a hunt on Thursday when he was attacked by people following the hunt on foot. Charming people.
Then there's this winner of a quote at the end:
Here's another with more details than the BBC story offers (excerpt):
Mirror.co.uk: BAYING FOR BLOOD
Police are investigating an assault on Kevin Hill, who was monitoring the welfare of a stag during a hunt on Thursday when he was attacked by people following the hunt on foot. Charming people.Then there's this winner of a quote at the end:
Mr Yandle says the hunt does not condone violence.Um, maybe I'm missing something here, but isn't hunting by its very nature violent?
Here's another with more details than the BBC story offers (excerpt):
Mirror.co.uk: BAYING FOR BLOOD
Other blood sport fans, including parents with children, stood and watched as he was beaten up, ignoring his pleas for help.
One elderly man even laughed as blood poured from Mr Hill's gashed forehead after the beating.
The campaigner - who was with a Daily Mirror investigation team - said: "I pleaded with the attacker to stop but the blows kept on coming. I was punched in the head three times and then kicked in the face twice on the ground."
Friday, October 28, 2005
Puppy mill owner gets six months in jail
Posted by Eric @ 5:26 PM
MyKawartha.com (Ontario): 'Puppy mill' owner get (sic) six months in jail
Six months is the maximum penalty, unfortunately. Considering their history, this is an embarrassment (excerpt):
Six months is the maximum penalty, unfortunately. Considering their history, this is an embarrassment (excerpt):
Their conviction is just the latest chapter in the couple's 41-year record of seizures, convictions and penalties.Granted, the guy is 81. Guess he didn't feel like taking on a new vocation so late in life.
In 1964, police removed 56 dogs from Ralph Misener. Details are sketchy, but Mr. Misener, then 41, was convicted of cruelty to animals and obstructing police.
Five years later, he was back in court; this time, sentenced to three months in jail for failing to provide adequate care to animals in breeding operations now known as puppy mills.
More animals were seized from Mr. Misener and his wife in 1976, 1977, 1989, 2001 and, most recently, April 2003.
The 2001 investigation involved 231 dogs. The outcome: short conditional sentences and three years probation.
Dog thefts on the rise
Posted by Eric @ 3:57 AM
Herald Sun (Melbourne): Dog thefts on the rise
It's easy to blame all this on careless owners, but not fair. Certainly some animals have been more easily stolen due to negligence, but you wouldn't think you'd have to worry about your pet being stolen out of your yard. It really is that bad, though:
Here in the U.S., we have some uglier possibilities to consider (Wilson Daily: Dogs gone ... snatched?, excerpt):
It's easy to blame all this on careless owners, but not fair. Certainly some animals have been more easily stolen due to negligence, but you wouldn't think you'd have to worry about your pet being stolen out of your yard. It really is that bad, though:
DEVIOUS dog thieves are breaking pet owners' hearts around Melbourne.I don't know how things work in Melbourne, but this was surprising to me:
About 30 dogs disappear without trace each week and animal welfare heads fear they have been stolen.
The much-loved mutts are never found, despite being microchipped.
"If they were lost they would eventually turn up in an animal pound or if they were run over, someone would report sighting the body," said Graeme Smith, Lost Dogs' Home head.
"I would say 95 per cent of the dogs that go missing every week without trace have been stolen."
"Pet shop prices for crossbred pups have skyrocketed in five years and a dog that would have cost $200 a few years ago now sells for up to $1000," Dr Smith said.Not that the animals are so expensive, considering (oh, I do abhor the sale of animals), but that this was the one reason they had for why this could be going on... If it's true, how very quaint.
Here in the U.S., we have some uglier possibilities to consider (Wilson Daily: Dogs gone ... snatched?, excerpt):
"I know there are people out there who will do this and sell dogs to laboratories," [Sandra Blavek] said. "I've heard about it before. I came from Virginia and once there was a rash like this there."Either option means a cruel fate for your companion animal. If you have a loved one in your life, be paranoid if that's what it takes. We're not talking about losing a cell phone here.
Utley said it could be someone just riding around looking for small dogs in yards. Some dogs are stolen for "bait" to train animals used in illegal dog fighting activities or they are taken out of the county and sold to dog breeders, [animal control director Carl] Utley said.
"We need to remind people who let out their animals to watch them because it doesn't take but a matter of minutes for someone to snatch up a dog and take off with it," he said.
New Orleans conditions deplorable for animals
Posted by Eric @ 3:22 AM
Great Falls Tribune: New Orleans conditions deplorable for animals
No, I haven't forgotten about the animals in the Gulf, specifically the now heavily-covered New Orleans animals. I am, of course, thrilled that so many people volunteered their time, and so many individuals and organizations put up the money to help rescue the thousands of animals that were evacuated from the city.
What is hard to process still are the number dead and the number still at large in New Orleans. Just look at the devastation in the photo from this article that talks about the dogs in the latter category (excerpt):
No, I haven't forgotten about the animals in the Gulf, specifically the now heavily-covered New Orleans animals. I am, of course, thrilled that so many people volunteered their time, and so many individuals and organizations put up the money to help rescue the thousands of animals that were evacuated from the city.
What is hard to process still are the number dead and the number still at large in New Orleans. Just look at the devastation in the photo from this article that talks about the dogs in the latter category (excerpt):
...the city has entered another phase in animal rescue: The animals that wanted to be caught, the frightened abandoned pets, are caught. What are left are mostly packs of wary, feral, hungry and sick dogs.It is nice to know that, just about 2 months after the disaster, dogs are still being rescued. I thank everyone who's following through on this enormous task. The three weeks I put in doing what little I could was an intense period. I can only imagine the exhaustion, physical and emotional, consuming the LASPCA officers trained by Johnson and Thurston.
"There is no food; there is no water," he said. "These animals are barely alive. Free-ranging dogs anywhere are a danger to the public. This is a public health issue."Worse yet, the dogs threaten to disrupt the most grisly aspect of New Orleans' recovery — the hunt for the dead.
"They could potentially attack the cadaver search and rescue dogs," Johnson said.
He and his assistant, Gardiner wildlife biologist Linda Thurston, drove to New Orleans with 40 traps late last week. For the next week, they are staying in a borrowed R.V. parked with a host of others beside a rented, watermelon-green cinderblock warehouse in Algiers, across the Mississippi River from downtown New Orleans.
Algiers missed the toughest beatings from the storms. Nonetheless, you can see daylight through the roof of the warehouse that now serves as a temporary animal shelter for the animals.
The two brought 40 humane live traps: dog-sized cages baited with food. When a dog steps in for a bite, it depresses a lever that shuts a door behind it.
The feral dog roundup will concentrate on the Ninth Ward, the poor part of New Orleans destroyed by levee breaks. That's where crews continue to find dead; no residents are allowed in at night and there is still no running water, toilets, gas or electricity.
There are also almost no cats.
"A lot of that is because of the dogs," Johnson said.
He and Thurston specialize in the calm capture of wild or feral animals. It's very important, he said, to handle the animals quietly and calmly from the first moment they make contact with people.
These animals haven't been touched by people in more than a month. Since the hurricanes hit, the dogs have been on their own in a crippled city with a sometimes desperate human population for weeks.
"Most of their human encounters have been violent and unfriendly," he said. "We're asking them to work with us."
That first encounter, Johnson said, typically in a cage in an abandoned part of town, is a step toward trusting people again. Anything traumatic reinforces a dog's negative to nonexistent relationship with the people trying to save it.
Often, Thurston said, that first moment brings about "an instant switch."
"They feel safe again," she said. "The tail starts waging."
Thursday, October 27, 2005
Help protect polar bears from extinction
Posted by Eric @ 11:00 PM

Received this e-mail tonight and thought I'd pass it along for my animal-friendlies who want to do anything they can to help:
Dear NRDC Member,
At this moment, the polar bear's Arctic habitat is literally melting away
beneath it due to global warming. If we don't intervene now, these majestic
bears may not survive beyond the next few decades.
Please go to http://www.savebiogems.org/polar/takeaction.asp and send a message urging Interior Secretary Gale Norton to protect polar bears as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act.
Global warming has already taken a serious toll on the large expanses of summer sea ice that polar bears depend on for survival. Since 1979, more than 20 percent of the polar ice cap has disappeared. Yet the Bush Administration
refuses to lift a finger to help the polar bear.
Leading scientists now warn that if current rates of global warming continue, the polar bear could face extinction by the end of this century.
To head off this unthinkable tragedy, NRDC is launching a campaign of intense public and courtroom pressure to compel the administration to act. We have just put the Interior Secretary on notice that we will be taking her agency to federal court on behalf of the polar bear.
Please join our effort to protect polar bears by speaking out right now. Go to http://www.savebiogems.org/polar/takeaction.asp and call on the Interior Secretary to take the first step toward ensuring a future for the polar bear by listing it as a threatened species.
Thank you for taking action.
Sincerely,
John H. Adams
President
Natural Resources Defense Council
Academy To End Animal Testing
Posted by Eric @ 10:42 PM
The St. Petersburg Times: Academy To End Animal Testing
Huzzah. Progress:
Huzzah. Progress:
The St. Petersburg Veterinary Academy this week committed itself to bringing an end to vivisection for educational purposes, becoming the first university in Russia to do so.The article goes into specific alternatives:
“Imagine a rabbit with its head tightly fixed, with drops of new cosmetic products being tested on its eye — this is pure torture but it can be replaced perfectly adequately by a reliable non-animal technique,” she said.Here's hoping that other veterinary programs in Russia (and around the world) follow suit.
“Students can use models, computer programs or simulators to practice,” said Nick Jukes, head of Interniche (the International Network for Human Education), a UK-based non-profit non-governmental organization represented in over forty countries.
Jukes said there are currently over 500 different techniques that can be used in teaching students that don’t involve killing animals, such as the use of models.
“Models help students to gain confidence when learning basic operations such as giving injections. It’s much more stressful to have to carry on sticking a needle into a live animal until it dies.”
Where real animals are essential, Interniche recommends the use of animals that have died of natural causes. “In every city it’s always possible to find enough animals which have died naturally or have been euthanised,” Jukes said. “As a final step in training, we suggest sending students to veterinary clinics to assist experienced specialists.”
Eat that ice cream, kill an orangutan
Posted by Eric @ 10:34 PM
Asia Times Online: Eat that ice cream, kill an orangutan
Here's something I wasn't really aware of until I stumbled across it. Evidently the primary focus at the moment is on Britain. Good to read papers from around the world, sometimes (excerpt):
Here's something I wasn't really aware of until I stumbled across it. Evidently the primary focus at the moment is on Britain. Good to read papers from around the world, sometimes (excerpt):
The orangutan is seriously endangered by the dietary habits of his nearest cousin, environmental activists say, explaining that man needs vast quantities of palm oil to fry his greasy foods and has been steadily turning Southeast Asia's forests into palm plantations.A worldwide NGO campaign is ferociously defending the orangutans' turf, going after customers' spending habits:
Unlike earlier campaigns, the focus this time is not on stopping deforestation and saving an endangered species but on directly blaming Western consumers for the decimation of orangutan populations.
The campaign argues that if you buy common household items such as crisps, ice cream, detergents, bread, lipstick and soap that contains palm oil, you are helping to drive orangutans to extinction. The campaigners say that as the demand for palm oil grows so does the felling of forests and in turn the destruction of orangutan habitats and exposure of the animal to poachers.
Frankensteer definitely something to beef about
Posted by Eric @ 10:06 PM
edmontonsun.com | Showbiz: Movies, TV and Theatre: Frankensteer definitely something to beef about
For those Canadian AAFL readers, try to watch this, if I'm not getting the news to you too late. If you happen to catch it, please share your thoughts with me.
I don't like how the article starts off using the word propaganda, which is derogatory in nature and implies that pro-vegetarian films are misleading:
For those Canadian AAFL readers, try to watch this, if I'm not getting the news to you too late. If you happen to catch it, please share your thoughts with me.
I don't like how the article starts off using the word propaganda, which is derogatory in nature and implies that pro-vegetarian films are misleading:
This is not a pro-vegetarian propaganda film, although the troubling revelations certainly inspire a meat-free lifestyle.So, not a promising start. However, I do like the end:
This documentary serves up a stockpile of disturbing information from sources on all sides of the cattle fence, including an agricultural research scientist, feedlot operators, an agricultural economist, organic farmers, veterinarians and Health Canada officials.
Among the revelations:
- The vast quantity of antibiotics fed to cattle comes with potential negative effects for humans (such as becoming resistant to antibiotics for human infections).
- Health Canada has OK'd the use of a cancer-causing growth hormone that has long been banned in Europe, and has refused to make public the reasons for this decision.
- Because of mad cow disease concerns, we no longer force cows to eat the remains of other cows, but we still feed them cow blood and other animal remains, which is, of course, an unnatural diet for the animal.
- Certain parts of cows are now considered bio-hazardous products, and food safety agencies warn us to treat ground beef as if it were a toxic product for fear of E. coli bacteria.
The low-budget, straightforward production avoids in-your-face pandering, choosing instead to lay out the details with a simple, no-frills approach. But be warned: much of it isn't pretty.
In the end, the makers of Frankensteer say certified organic beef is the way to go, even if you have to pay an extra few bucks for the cut (better yet, skip the burger altogether).
Some bravery as a side dish
Posted by Eric @ 6:11 PM
MSNBC.com | Food: Some bravery as a side dish
Thanks again to Mary Sue Sylwestrzak for forwarding an article to AAFL. I had my doubts about posting this one. As Mary Sue pointed out, none of these 7 "foods" that requre a fearless stomach are plant-based. But this quote caught my eye (excerpt):
Thanks again to Mary Sue Sylwestrzak for forwarding an article to AAFL. I had my doubts about posting this one. As Mary Sue pointed out, none of these 7 "foods" that requre a fearless stomach are plant-based. But this quote caught my eye (excerpt):
It's a dangerous game to start calling food gross. One person's dog meat is another's Rocky Mountain oysters, and yet another's haggis."Dangerous, indeed. Too bad more people look the other way when it comes to this difficult distinction. The article considers the moving line between food and non-food animals a number of times, so it might be worth your time to take a look, if you have a strong stomach...
ABC News "Primetime" Features Story about Dolphin Trafficking and the Fight to Protect Japan's Dolphins
Posted by Eric @ 3:55 PM
Earth Island Institute: ABC News "Primetime" Features Story about Dolphin Trafficking and the Fight to Protect Japan's Dolphins
Here's the entirety of a press release from Earth Island to make all concerned aware that the show is airing tonight. Try to tune in, if you can.
Here's the entirety of a press release from Earth Island to make all concerned aware that the show is airing tonight. Try to tune in, if you can.
ABC's news program PRIMETIME will feature a story on the killing of dolphins in Japan and the impacts of the trafficking in live dolphins for aquariums. The segment will include efforts by Earth Island Institute, the Elsa Nature Conservancy (ENC) of Japan, and One Voice, a leading French animal protection organization, to protect the dolphins and stop the annual slaughter.
AIR DATE: October 27, 2005
10 p.m. -- East & West Coast
9 p.m. -- Central & Mountain
Japan's Fisheries Agency allows the slaughter of an estimated 20,000 dolphins annually off their shores. This brutal massacre -- the largest scale dolphin kill in the world -- goes on for six months of every year. Even more shocking, the captive dolphin industry is an accomplice to the kill. Many dolphins are caught in "drive fisheries"; conducted by the fishermen of Taiji and Futo, where whole schools are herded into shallow waters into enclosures. The international aquarium industry pays thousands of dollars for a few of the dolphins used in aquarium shows; the rest are slaughtered and sold on the Japanese market.
The Primetime program also exposes dolphin trafficking operations in the Solomon Islands, Mexico, and the Caribbean.
Earth Island Institute, the Elsa Nature Conservancy (ENC) of Japan, and One Voice -- France have joined together to end the dolphin slaughter.
Dramatic footage of the dolphin slaughter obtained by our coalition will be featured on the show, as well as interviews with activists from our organizations.
MEDIA ALERT: VIDEO FOOTAGE and PHOTOS of the dolphin drive fisheries of Japan is available from Earth Island Institute by calling (415) 788-3666 or faxing (415) 788-7324, or from Sakae Hemmi, Elsa Nature Conservancy of Japan (81)-298511637. For further information, visit:
www.saveTaijiDolphins.org or
enjoy.pial.jp/~animals/elsaCopyright 2004, Earth Island Institute. All Rights Reserved.
Kill the researcher
Posted by Eric @ 3:43 PM
San Francisco Chronicle: Kill the researcher
ADDED: (also see Real Video, October 26, 2005 -- full committee hearing)
A couple of days ago, I applauded Dr. Jerry Vlasak for holding Antonio Villaraigosa to his campaign promise and mentioned I've had my differences with him. In the second paragraph quoted below, you can see what that main difference is (excerpt):
I disagree. In the very short term, these intimidation tactics [i]seem[/i] to be having a small impact, chiseling away at large corporations, who are now pillaging the coffers of organizations that oppose them.
But, once the tipping point is reached, the expansion of terror laws currently reaching to militant animal rights activists will come down hard (already happening in the UK), and I simply don't believe there are as many people willing to commit violence for the animals as there are for, say, Sunni control of Iraq's future.
There's a certain sociopathic mindset that can justify violence for humans in order to prevent violence toward animals. I've heard AR militants say they don't care about what people think, and some even applaud the deaths of those who exploit animals. This turns my stomach. While the animals are indeed innocents in all this, the vast majority of people involved in the exploitation of animals are not evil bastards deserving wrath and vengeance. Most of the justification used to exploit animals in research is similar to the justifications used to exploit animals for food, only even more fanatic, because people (wrongly, in the majority of cases, as least) think animal research is a "necessary evil."
While the exploitation of animals in this way may be morally wrong, it is is a systemic problem that won't be changed by harassment and intimidation of individuals. That's barely even a band-aid solution. The real solution is to subvert the whole paradigm.
Look at what happened to smoking. There's such a stigma attached to smoking now, that those that continue to smoke either can't help themselves, or they simply don't care (I'm sure there are a myriad of other reasons, but those are two biggies).
I see a day when meat-eating is still legal, but it's something done in dark dinner clubs, away from judging eyes. We'll end up with "meat freaks" instead of vegan freaks.
ADDED: (also see Real Video, October 26, 2005 -- full committee hearing)
A couple of days ago, I applauded Dr. Jerry Vlasak for holding Antonio Villaraigosa to his campaign promise and mentioned I've had my differences with him. In the second paragraph quoted below, you can see what that main difference is (excerpt):
Jerry Vlasak, a Southern California physician who is spokesman for the North American Animal Liberation Press Office, also testified Wednesday. Vlasak dismissed the intimidation of Boruchin and others as "getting a little spray paint on the wall."I try to avoid such massive quotes, but this was a bit thought-provoking. The column, in it's own condemning way, suggests that Vlasak may be right.
Committee Chairman James Inhofe, R-Okla., questioned Vlasak about a statement Vlasak had made defending the assassination of medical researchers. Once again, Vlasak justified violence. For "people who are hurting animals and who will not stop when told to stop," he answered, one option would be murder, a "morally justifiable solution."
If anti-abortion fanatics were behind this vandalism, the Life Sciences saga -- not to mention Vlasak's support for killing medical researchers -- would be the stuff of countless editorials. But because the fanatics say they stand for beagles -- not Bibles -- the cognoscenti barely take notice. They're too busy complaining about how GOP limits to federal funding might crimp research to notice that some zealots advocate killing medical researchers.
If animal-rights nuts can get away with this brand of personal intimidation, extremists of all ideologies will take note. What began in the rat-hugging left will grow on the extreme right and the extreme left.
Bibi sees his company's plight as a "test case for a whole new brand of activism through personal intimidation." And it's winning: Life Sciences Research still remains off the New York Stock Exchange. Terrorism works.
Vlasak testified, "The animal-rights movement has been notoriously nonviolent up to this point."
It sounds as if the days of the friendly spray-painting, bomb-setting, child-porn accuser and club-vandalizing rat-hugger may be over. No more Mr. Nice Guy.
I disagree. In the very short term, these intimidation tactics [i]seem[/i] to be having a small impact, chiseling away at large corporations, who are now pillaging the coffers of organizations that oppose them.
But, once the tipping point is reached, the expansion of terror laws currently reaching to militant animal rights activists will come down hard (already happening in the UK), and I simply don't believe there are as many people willing to commit violence for the animals as there are for, say, Sunni control of Iraq's future.
There's a certain sociopathic mindset that can justify violence for humans in order to prevent violence toward animals. I've heard AR militants say they don't care about what people think, and some even applaud the deaths of those who exploit animals. This turns my stomach. While the animals are indeed innocents in all this, the vast majority of people involved in the exploitation of animals are not evil bastards deserving wrath and vengeance. Most of the justification used to exploit animals in research is similar to the justifications used to exploit animals for food, only even more fanatic, because people (wrongly, in the majority of cases, as least) think animal research is a "necessary evil."
While the exploitation of animals in this way may be morally wrong, it is is a systemic problem that won't be changed by harassment and intimidation of individuals. That's barely even a band-aid solution. The real solution is to subvert the whole paradigm.
Look at what happened to smoking. There's such a stigma attached to smoking now, that those that continue to smoke either can't help themselves, or they simply don't care (I'm sure there are a myriad of other reasons, but those are two biggies).
I see a day when meat-eating is still legal, but it's something done in dark dinner clubs, away from judging eyes. We'll end up with "meat freaks" instead of vegan freaks.
Pet pigs get Manatee's squeal of approval
Posted by Eric @ 3:22 AM
Herald-Tribune: Pet pigs get Manatee's squeal of approval
I'm always interested to see the line between pets and food blurred in this country (excerpt):
I'm always interested to see the line between pets and food blurred in this country (excerpt):
pot-bellied pigs are now legal in the county after a 4-3 vote by the County Commission to exempt the porkers from the county's definition of farm animals.There's that gosh-darned slippery slope again! What do we do? Heh-heh. Oh, the dilemma...
*snip*
Commission Chairman Ron Getman said the law could set a bad precedent and open the barn doors to other animals in neighborhoods.
"If we exclude pot-bellied pigs, what's next?" Getman asked. He warned that people will ask to have lambs, miniature horses and other animals that are now restricted to agricultural properties as domestic pets.
FAACE has rodeo in its sights
Posted by Eric @ 3:13 AM
icseftonandwestlancs: FAACE has rodeo in its sights
Germany has more progressive animal protection laws than many other countries, including America. It wouldn't surprise me to see rodeos ended there (excerpt):
That said, check out S.H.A.R.K. for more info on rodeo cruelty, and spread the word. Even though it won't end tomorrow in this country, we can stop it.
Germany has more progressive animal protection laws than many other countries, including America. It wouldn't surprise me to see rodeos ended there (excerpt):
Although the event is frowned upon in many nations, the 'bucking bronco' displays are popular in America, Canada, Portugal, Poland and Germany where the term 'rodeo' is not clearly defined in the animal protection law.I don't see this happening any time soon in America, unfortunately. It is very much seen as part of our country's tradition and identity (I mean, look at our president), and will be defended until there simply aren't enough (wannabe) cowboys left to put up a fight. That sounds pessimistic, I know, but though I hold out hope for an end to this barbaric practice, mucking with the rodeo is like mucking with America, and that's a tough fight for anyone.
Despite it seeming harmless, the cattle and horses are often cruelly coerced in to seeming wild through a variety of painful and torturous tricks.
But now, thanks to footage captured by FAACE at recent rodeo events in Germany, the sport could become illegal within a year.
That said, check out S.H.A.R.K. for more info on rodeo cruelty, and spread the word. Even though it won't end tomorrow in this country, we can stop it.
Wednesday, October 26, 2005
Third whale pod beaches self, 130 die
Posted by Eric @ 5:50 PM
MSNBC.com | Environment: Third whale pod beaches self, 130 die
Not to get all sentimental on you, but this article made me awfully sad. It's so senseless, and it bothers me that we still don't know for sure why the pilot whales have beached themselves. If the following theory is correct, these 130 deaths are on the military's head, and we need their sonar devices to be altered or outlawed:
Not to get all sentimental on you, but this article made me awfully sad. It's so senseless, and it bothers me that we still don't know for sure why the pilot whales have beached themselves. If the following theory is correct, these 130 deaths are on the military's head, and we need their sonar devices to be altered or outlawed:
Conservationists believe that some strandings may be caused by military sonar devices that emit sound waves, potentially shattering the ear drums of whales and disorienting them.I included that last line just to make myself feel a little better. Doesn't make what happened (nor Japan's whale hunting) any better, but when I read about how endangered the Humpbacks are, it's at least reassuring to know that 130 dead pilot whales won't mean the end of the species.
Japan hunts pilot whales but overall the species’ population is thought to be abundant and stable.
Council panel backs foie gras ban
Posted by Eric @ 1:25 PM
Chicago Sun-Times: Council panel backs foie gras ban
I have to say that I somewhat agree that legislating people's choices is a "slippery slope," but we do it all the time. Murder is illegal. Stealing is illegal. I have no problem with outlawing cruel activities. Humans aren't the only beings that should be protected from harm by other humans.
I was particularly pleased to see this come up in the article (excerpt):
I have to say that I somewhat agree that legislating people's choices is a "slippery slope," but we do it all the time. Murder is illegal. Stealing is illegal. I have no problem with outlawing cruel activities. Humans aren't the only beings that should be protected from harm by other humans.
I was particularly pleased to see this come up in the article (excerpt):
[Carrie Nahabedian] added, "We're going down a slippery slope. If we're going to look at foie gras, then we should look at a lot of other things. Maybe it moves on to hamburger and maybe it should. We have mad cow [disease] threatening us on every shore. We have the bird flu that is of major concern. Maybe we need to look at everything."Heh-heh. Maybe we do...
Rome's city council passes animal-friendly by-laws
Posted by Eric @ 12:48 AM
CNN.com: Rome bans 'cruel' goldfish bowls
I'm fairly tweaked that this landed under "Offbeat News." At least they didn't treat the story so shabbily on the air, which is where most people were likely to hear about it. These are some progressive policies but, as the article points out, they will be hard to enforce (excerpt):
I'm fairly tweaked that this landed under "Offbeat News." At least they didn't treat the story so shabbily on the air, which is where most people were likely to hear about it. These are some progressive policies but, as the article points out, they will be hard to enforce (excerpt):
In July 2004, parliament passed a law setting big fines and jail terms for people who abandon pets and since then local governments have added their own animal welfare rules many of which will be difficult to police.Despite the difficulty of convincing the public to obey the exercise rule, the sheer heft of the law behind it gives animals greater status and also makes Romans more cognizant of the seriousness of caring for a companion animal, as well as the animal's needs.
The new Rome by-law requires owners to regularly exercise their dogs, and bans them from docking their pets' tails for aesthetic reasons.
Animal rights groups estimate that around 150,000 pet dogs and 200,000 cats are abandoned in Italy every year.
"It's good to do whatever we can for our animals who in exchange for a little love fill our existence with their attention," said Monica Cirinna, the councilor behind the by-law.A big thumbs up to Ms. Cirinna. Um, unless that's considered a rude gesture in Italy. Any diplomats lurking about?
"The civilization of a city can also be measured by this," she told Rome daily Il Messaggero.
Tuesday, October 25, 2005
Free-range grazing of poultry banned
Posted by Eric @ 11:45 PM
Financial Times | International economy: Free-range grazing of poultry banned
Avian flu is prompting producers to bring their birds indoors, which is a bit of a step backward (excerpt):
The first question that came to mind when I read this was addressed here:
Avian flu is prompting producers to bring their birds indoors, which is a bit of a step backward (excerpt):
France's agriculture ministry on Tuesday ordered farmers to keep poultry indoors in the coastal and eastern regions of France most at risk of catching bird flu through contact with migrating wild birds.Ah, foie gras at Christmas... blech. Would love to see a foie gras ban reach France someday.
France is Europe's largest poultry producer and, although no case of bird flu has been detected in the country, concern is growing that the spread of the disease to Europe is already hitting sales of chicken, duck and turkey meat.
Fears of bird flu also threaten the foie gras market over the Christmas period, which accounts for 70 per cent of annual sales of the delicacy.
The first question that came to mind when I read this was addressed here:
farms with no means to shelter birds indoors would be exempt from the ban and that poultry products could still be marketed as free range, even if affected by the ban.That's what I was afraid of.
Six months 'not good enough'
Posted by Eric @ 10:36 PM
TorontoSun.com | Mark Bonokoski: Six months 'not good enough'
Mark Bonokoski's much-needed column on the weakness of cruelty laws includes a chilling exchange with a breeder convicted of unnecessary suffering (excerpt):
Letters of appreciation are in order for Mark Bonokoski, or write to the editor.
Mark Bonokoski's much-needed column on the weakness of cruelty laws includes a chilling exchange with a breeder convicted of unnecessary suffering (excerpt):
Ralph Misener, 81, and his wife, Rose, 65, were to be sentenced last Monday after being found guilty of causing unnecessary suffering following a 2003 raid on their Vaughan puppy mill. According to reports, 43 dogs and puppies were found languishing in conditions so fetid that inspectors became physically ill.Disturbing insight into the mind of a puppy-mill owner. I've said it many times, and I'll repeat it: puppy mills should be banned. Forever.
But, on the eve of that sentencing, the notorious couple did an 11th-hour dodge -- through a voice message from Ralph Misener to Crown attorney Jason Gorda stating that Rose Misener had admitted herself to a Lindsay-area hospital after supposedly suffering a dizzy spell, and that they therefore had no ride to court.
Instead of ordering a warrant for their immediate arrest, Justice Simon Armstrong gave them a week's leave.
That reprieve ended yesterday.
Ralph Misener is going to jail for six months, and Rose Misener will return to the cottage-style bungalow west of here for 12 months of house arrest.
The law, as it exists today, has no punitive teeth.
"It's frustrating," said SPCA inspector Mike Draper. "And it was frustrating for the judge -- knowing that he was limited in how long he could prohibit them from owning animals.
"Two years is all the current law allows. Just two years."
It is Sunday evening -- 8:50 p.m. -- when the phone is finally answered at the Misener household, hard by the Head Lake Trailer Park, a family-run business west of here where co-owner Sue Nicholson found a Misener-owned dog running loose this summer, its coat filthy and matted.
The phone is answered on the second ring, and it is Rose Misener's voice that comes on the line, but she immediately hands the phone to her husband once she hears who's calling.
"Will the two of you be in court for your sentencing tomorrow?" Ralph Misener is asked.
'JUST WATCH ME'
"Who are you? You're not God," he says. "You're nothing but a two-bit reporter."
The question is repeated.
"It's none of your goddam business," Misener says. "Don't ever call here again. I'll find where you live. I can find you, you know."
"How?" he is asked.
"Just watch me," he replies.
Letters of appreciation are in order for Mark Bonokoski, or write to the editor.
Humpbacks doomed: rights group
Posted by Eric @ 10:27 PM
NEWS.com.au | Tasmania | Breaking News 24/7: Humpbacks doomed: rights group:
"Save the whales" is as pertinent a cry as ever. It blows me away that it has come to this. At least the whales have a Senator speaking out for them, too (excerpt):
"Save the whales" is as pertinent a cry as ever. It blows me away that it has come to this. At least the whales have a Senator speaking out for them, too (excerpt):
'How can you discuss the Antarctic marine living system without discussing the biggest creature of the lot?'
Senator Brown said Prime Minister John Howard could be ignoring the whales' plight during negotiations for a free trade agreement with Japan.
'That's pretty low politics if that's what the problem for the Australian government is,' he said.
Girl, 8, Credited With Year's 1st Bear Kill
Posted by Eric @ 9:17 PM
The Washington Post: Girl, 8, Credited With Year's 1st Bear Kill
Here's a dream article for hunters in the wake of a lot of anti-hunting articles I've been seeing lately. I would hope that the reaction backfires, though, provoking horror instead of amusement (excerpt):
These are not the values we should be instilling in our children. Not even close.
Thanks to Karen Dawn and Mary Sue Sylwestrzak for making sure I saw this disturbing story.
Please take this opportunity to write a pithy, articulate letter to the Washington Post. I'd be only too happy to review what you want to send for grammar, punctuation, and length, if you want to bounce your letter off of someone.
Here's a dream article for hunters in the wake of a lot of anti-hunting articles I've been seeing lately. I would hope that the reaction backfires, though, provoking horror instead of amusement (excerpt):
Donald Stiles beamed as his daughter, dressed in hunters' camouflage with a fluorescent orange vest, told how she skipped school to shoot the male bear.As were the NRA and hunters everywhere. What a soft piece on the subject. We hear from the HSUS, but this seems to be a fairly glowing account of the exploits of a four year-old girl who was a good enough shot to hit a bear 150 feet away with her rifle, then do it again, prompting the wounded animal to run 150 feet before it collapsed, no doubt dying an ugly death. And why? So an 8 year-old girl can have it as a trophy.
After winning one of 200 bear-hunting permits granted by lottery this year -- and acing the required safety test with a score of 98 -- Sierra recalled being rousted out of bed by her mother at 4:58 a.m., wolfing down a bowl of cereal and heading outside, to a field on her granduncle's farm. They waited two hours in the bush under a steady, cold rain.
"I was dragging," Sierra said.
It got a bit brighter as the sun glowed sullenly through a thick blanket of clouds, she said. Sierra's granduncle, Robert Harvey, saw a dark shadow in the distance, but he didn't know what it was. Her father thought it was a bear.
"I froze up," she recalled. Regaining her composure, Sierra stood behind a tree, waiting until the bear was about 50 yards away, she said. Then she took careful aim and squeezed the trigger. The bullet struck the bear behind the shoulder. Unfazed by the rifle's light recoil, she said, she ejected the casing, reloaded and fired another round.
It hit. The bear ran about 150 feet before collapsing.
"I was really, really, really happy," Sierra exclaimed.
These are not the values we should be instilling in our children. Not even close.
Thanks to Karen Dawn and Mary Sue Sylwestrzak for making sure I saw this disturbing story.
Please take this opportunity to write a pithy, articulate letter to the Washington Post. I'd be only too happy to review what you want to send for grammar, punctuation, and length, if you want to bounce your letter off of someone.
Terror laws will apply to animal rights lobby
Posted by Eric @ 12:56 AM
Times Online UK: Terror laws will apply to animal rights lobby
Applied to the AR lobby? Wha--?
Here. Read this (excerpt):
This is a serious civil rights issue for the people of England, and it fires a warning shot across the bow of animal activism in this country, where we're not too far from seeing a similar approach taken here in the U.S.
Applied to the AR lobby? Wha--?
Here. Read this (excerpt):
ANIMAL rights activists who glorify militant acts against economic targets and laboratories are to face prosecution under terror laws aimed at al-Qaeda supporters.Um, that's chilling. While I speak out against doing these things, I also speak out against restriction of speech. Looks like the UK is getting more fascistic, too. Am I still allowed to say that?
The move, confirmed last night by Charles Clarke, the Home Secretary, means that extremists convicted under the new legislation could be jailed for seven years and suspects held without charge for up to three months.Excuse me? So if an animal rights activist says that old so-and-so had it coming to him, she can be held without charge for up to three months? Talk about terrorism. This is a terror tactic designed to suppress free speech. Unreal.
Mr Clarke was known to be concerned that previous legislation to combat animal rights extremists has so far resulted in only one prosecution.Well, that would be one thing, but what he's saying and what this article is covering are two different things.
In July, a new offence of economic sabotage was introduced under the Serious and Organised Crime Act, after pressure from companies involved in Britain’s £3 billion-a-year life sciences industry. However, lawyers had questioned how easy the offence would be to prove and Mr Clarke was thought to have had doubts about its effectiveness.
The new terrorism laws were designed primarily to target the so-called preachers of hate who glorify terrorist attacks. However, the Home Secretary told MPs and peers that animal rights supporters who celebrated militant attacks should also face prosecution.
Speaking to the joint Lords and Commons human rights committee, he said: “I certainly think that animal rights terrorism is something that has to be attacked. Those who argue that committing violent acts of terror to promote the cause of animal rights and who justify it by referring to it would be covered by this legislation.”
Mr Clarke made reference to an attack in July on an Oxford University boathouse which caused an estimated £500,000 worth of damage. The university was targeted because animal rights activists want to stop it from building a new animal research laboratory. Work was halted last year when the main contractor, Montpellier, pulled out after being threatened. It has yet to restart.
Brian Cass, the managing director of Huntingdon Life Sciences — Britain’s largest animal research facility, which has suffered a relentless campaign of vandalism and harassment — welcomed the Government’s decision.
Mr Cass, who suffered head injuries when he was attacked by masked animal rights extremists armed with pickaxe handles in 2001, said: “Anything that provides greater opportunities for the police to track down and prosecute people who are carrying out the kind of harassment and intimidation and occasionally violent acts that we’ve seen is very welcome.”
...industry sources last night expressed surprise at the move.I actually like how this guy frames the issue, using the phrase, "in the name of animal rights activism" (allowing for a distinction between militants and non-militants that these terror laws do not allow), and how his last quote suggests that a free-speaking AR campaigner could be hurt by this law, when clearly she is nothing like someone hiding a pipebomb under his coat.
One senior official who was involved in formulating new laws to prevent activists from targeting drug developers and their suppliers, suggested that the proposals would be distracting.
“This is completely at odds with what we were expecting. There is a genuine concern from within the industry that labelling animal extremists as terrorists could get in the way of enforcement. I suspect that the police don’t really want this. We already have appropriate measures to deal with some of the more serious offences that are now being committed in the name of animal rights activism.”
The source added: “Let’s keep this in perspective — I would still rather meet an animal rights campaigner in Oxford Street than a suicide bomber. That is the difference between extremism and terrorism.”
This is a serious civil rights issue for the people of England, and it fires a warning shot across the bow of animal activism in this country, where we're not too far from seeing a similar approach taken here in the U.S.
Monday, October 24, 2005
AAFL Podcast for October 24, 2005
Posted by Eric @ 4:20 PM
This week's podcast (#12, for those keeping count at home) refers to the following links:
Click here for the podcast in Apple's AAC format.
- Simon's Poetry Backwater (w/AR Links)
- AAFL: Farmers, SPCA build bridges at meeting
- AAFL: PETA is right about trophy hunting
- AAFL: Prevent the Horse Slaughter Ban from Being Stripped
- AAFL: High Court strips animal rights activists of assets
- AAFL: Make way for a national pet policy
- VegLA
- Vegan.com: Erik's Diner
Click here for the podcast in Apple's AAC format.
As Nature Designed Them
Posted by Eric @ 2:12 AM
HuntingtonNews.Net: As Nature Designed Them
This guest commentary is called "As Nature Designed Them," and yet Mr. McKeon admits that the breeds are the way they are today due to selective breeding.
Greyhounds are bred for man to profit, not the animal. He calls the work these dogs do their "jobs." Did they apply for these jobs? What are they being paid? Can a greyhound move up the ladder and eventually own his own greyhounds?
Further, he relies on the old-fashioned, time-honored technique of bringing up the tradition of these animals, seen fit for human service since the ancient Egyptians first bred "them for their own pleasure and purpose," as if that somehow made it right. The Egyptians also kept slaves and used them to build the great pyramids. So?
He later makes it seem as if man was doing the greyhound a favor with the advent of track racing:
I don't really know Grey2k, and I can't vouch for their tactics, goals, or how much money goes into their own pockets versus the supposed subjects of their concern (this is a concern with just about any non-profit), but Grey2k is a red herring here.
The real focus should be on the idea of using animals for our own ends. In this case and many cases, making money. A dog-owner might argue, "Where's the harm?" The harm is in treating animals like things. Despite whatever bonds may form between animals and dogs, as long as they're treated as means to an end, they will always be oppressed.
This guest commentary is called "As Nature Designed Them," and yet Mr. McKeon admits that the breeds are the way they are today due to selective breeding.
Greyhounds are bred for man to profit, not the animal. He calls the work these dogs do their "jobs." Did they apply for these jobs? What are they being paid? Can a greyhound move up the ladder and eventually own his own greyhounds?
Further, he relies on the old-fashioned, time-honored technique of bringing up the tradition of these animals, seen fit for human service since the ancient Egyptians first bred "them for their own pleasure and purpose," as if that somehow made it right. The Egyptians also kept slaves and used them to build the great pyramids. So?
He later makes it seem as if man was doing the greyhound a favor with the advent of track racing:
According to his writings, possessed by the family of Owen P. Smith, the man who invented the mechanical lure, (which impelled the advent of track racing for greyhounds), said that one of the primary motivations for his invention was to spare the use of live rabbits, which were once coursed by greyhounds in competition.As is obvious by the time you reach that last paragraph, the only real benefit generated by greyhound racing is to humans.
His invention allowed athletic competition between and among greyhounds, without the need for live game, and on a specially prepared and maintained surface, which was considerably more forgiving than the often rocky or otherwise rugged terrain of the coursing field or hunting grounds.
So a new sport and new business sprung up around the Greyhound, beginning, in earnest, in the early 1930s. States became attracted to it, because of the windfall of taxes and fees they could levy on those who gambled on greyhound racing, those who owned the Racing Greyhounds, and those who owned the racing venues ---- i.e. the racetracks.
I don't really know Grey2k, and I can't vouch for their tactics, goals, or how much money goes into their own pockets versus the supposed subjects of their concern (this is a concern with just about any non-profit), but Grey2k is a red herring here.
The real focus should be on the idea of using animals for our own ends. In this case and many cases, making money. A dog-owner might argue, "Where's the harm?" The harm is in treating animals like things. Despite whatever bonds may form between animals and dogs, as long as they're treated as means to an end, they will always be oppressed.
Sunday, October 23, 2005
PETA is right about trophy hunting
Posted by Eric @ 6:23 PM
The Indianapolis Star: PETA is right about trophy hunting
You couldn't ask for a better headline in the Sports section of an Indianopolis newspaper. Hey, guess what, PETA is right!
Of course, he does point out where he thinks PETA is wrong, about pets and such. Not sure if he means pets bred for purchase, which I am definitely against, but I am certainly not against people taking in animals that would otherwise be euthanized or live out their lives in a cage.
But, ultimately, this article comes down firmly on PETA's side when it comes to canned hunting (excerpt):
Frankly, I'd be more than happy to leave alone those hunters who provide food for their family's table. The hunters that respect life (even as they take it) and choose to live more as outdoorsmen (and women) deserve respect, in my opinion, and should frankly be the last bastion of animal-eating in the world, if it should persist.
It's those that hunt purely for sport, for trophies, that deserve scorn, and it's that type of hunting that should be outlawed for all time, recognizing its inherent barbarity.
If, after ending canned hunting and freeing animals from pet stores, circuses, rodeos, factory farms, and other cruel institutions, we can't seem to accept food hunting or small family-farmed animals, we can consider those topics then, but following my principles of least harm, those types of activities are way down on my list of priorities. I would venture to say that focusing on them at all right now is harmful to the movement, and consequently to the vast majority of animals.
More on the subject in the same paper:
The Indianapolis Star: Fair game?
You couldn't ask for a better headline in the Sports section of an Indianopolis newspaper. Hey, guess what, PETA is right!
Of course, he does point out where he thinks PETA is wrong, about pets and such. Not sure if he means pets bred for purchase, which I am definitely against, but I am certainly not against people taking in animals that would otherwise be euthanized or live out their lives in a cage.
But, ultimately, this article comes down firmly on PETA's side when it comes to canned hunting (excerpt):
If the NRA knows what's best for it, it will come out against the safari hunting of lions, leopards, hippos, zebras, elephants, baboons, cape buffalo, giraffes, crocodiles, wildcats, etc.This, of course, is not to show support for PETA, but to concede one of their points, solely to help preserve hunting in general.
All of these African animals have prices on their heads, ranging from a 10-day, $14,500 elephant hunt to a 21-day, $39,800 lion, leopard and buffalo hunt.
Allowing the hunts is the business of Zambia, Tanzania, Zimbabwe and Namibia.
But killing the animals for the sake of a trophy head to hang on the wall is the ethical business of U.S. hunters. They should boycott it.
It can be explained to our kids and grandkids why it's acceptable to catch a fish or shoot a deer or a game bird, or why there's nothing wrong with having a pup, kitten or goldfish for a pet.
What our kids don't understand is why a wealthy person wants to use the money to kill an elephant, lion or leopard just for something to brag about.
Nope, it can't be explained and PETA feeds on that.
Frankly, I'd be more than happy to leave alone those hunters who provide food for their family's table. The hunters that respect life (even as they take it) and choose to live more as outdoorsmen (and women) deserve respect, in my opinion, and should frankly be the last bastion of animal-eating in the world, if it should persist.
It's those that hunt purely for sport, for trophies, that deserve scorn, and it's that type of hunting that should be outlawed for all time, recognizing its inherent barbarity.
If, after ending canned hunting and freeing animals from pet stores, circuses, rodeos, factory farms, and other cruel institutions, we can't seem to accept food hunting or small family-farmed animals, we can consider those topics then, but following my principles of least harm, those types of activities are way down on my list of priorities. I would venture to say that focusing on them at all right now is harmful to the movement, and consequently to the vast majority of animals.
More on the subject in the same paper:
The Indianapolis Star: Fair game?
Saturday, October 22, 2005
Prevent the Horse Slaughter Ban from Being Stripped
Posted by Eric @ 7:42 PM
Figured I'd relay this mass e-mail to my readers, in case some of you are not yet on the HSUS mailing list.
Dear Eric,Don't let agricultural interests get in the way of a strong vote by our duly elected leaders. Raise your voice for the horses now.
With your help, both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives overwhelmingly voted to ban horse slaughter in the United States. All of your great work was essential to these dual victories in Congress.
But that work is in danger of being undone!
We fear that the horse slaughter ban is going to be stripped during final passage of the Agriculture Appropriations bill. We cannot allow this outrageous action -- which would violate the overwhelming majorities in both the House and the Senate. If the horse slaughter ban is dropped, nearly 100,000 horses will be slaughtered for human consumption overseas next year.
We have only days left before this issue is decided.
Reach for your phone now and call your two U.S. Senators and Representative in Washington, D.C. and urge them to oppose the final Agriculture Appropriations conference report if it doesn't contain the horse slaughter ban.
[Ed. note: I live in Hollywood, CA, so the automated e-mail selected my representatives. You will want to contact your local reps, obviously: Congress / Senate]
Senator Dianne Feinstein
(202) 224-3841
Rep. Henry Waxman
(202) 225-3976
Senator Barbara Boxer
(202) 224-3553
Worried about making a phone call? It's simple! Your call will take no more than two minutes. You will speak to a staff assistant who will take your message and pass it along to your Representative or Senators.
Unsure what to say? Just follow this script for your phone call:
"Hello, I'm calling from [your town and state] to let you know I've heard that the ban on horse slaughter in the Agriculture Appropriations bill is being stripped by the conference committee. After landslide votes in both House and Senate, that is an outrage. I want [your Representative or Senators' names] to oppose any Agriculture Appropriations conference report that doesn't include the ban on horse slaughter. Thank you."
We need a massive outcry in the halls of Congress immediately if we hope to save our horses. Thank you for your fast action on this critical issue.
Sincerely,
Wayne Pacelle
President & CEO
The Humane Society of the United StatesCopyright © The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS)
All Rights Reserved.
The Humane Society of the United States
2100 L Street, NW
Washington, DC 20037
humanelines@hsus.org
202-452-1100
www.hsus.org
Mayor, Animal Activists Meet but Resolve Nothing
Posted by Eric @ 7:05 PM
Los Angeles Times: Mayor, Animal Activists Meet but Resolve Nothing
Now, I like Antonio Villaraigosa, from what little I know about him. As politicians go, he's a pretty good guy, it seems. But he is a politician, and I would certainly hate to see him act like some politicians and reneg on his campaign promises. This article addresses his inaction to date when it comes to fulfilling his campaign promise to fire Guerdon Stuckey.
I've had my differences with Jerry Vlasak and Pam Ferdin, but I do want to send them kudos for holding Mayor Villaraigosa to his promise. While I do believe the no-kill shelter policy issue is a complicated one, we can do better than we're doing, and Mr. Villaraigosa promised to pay attention to this issue if he became mayor (excerpt):
Some seriously animal-friendly people in this story, and I'm sure our mayor will see the light.
The article mentions that he doesn't want to be send bending to potential influences that might engage in illegal activities, pointing out a relationship between The Animal Defense League Los Angeles and the "domestic terror organization" Animal Liberation Front (ADL basically passes on communiques it receives from the ALF).
This is one reason I push so strongly to avoid illegal activities and to be careful about associating with those that don't. If you want a seat at the table, you can't give people in power an easy reason to keep you away from it.
If ADL speaks for the people of Los Angeles (the mayor's constituents), it's a lot stronger than if the ADL speaks for the ALF. I'm not saying they are, but that's a concern some have expressed, and it just goes to show how careful and concerned activists need to be if they're going to change things at the highest levels.
The public will support animal activists. We are, after all, the public.
And any animal-friendly person wants to see animals treated better and does not want to see them killed for no good reason. As long as activists hew to that, and stay away from intimidation, they will succeed. Because the more the public knows about how animals are being treated, the more the animals win.
Now, I like Antonio Villaraigosa, from what little I know about him. As politicians go, he's a pretty good guy, it seems. But he is a politician, and I would certainly hate to see him act like some politicians and reneg on his campaign promises. This article addresses his inaction to date when it comes to fulfilling his campaign promise to fire Guerdon Stuckey.
I've had my differences with Jerry Vlasak and Pam Ferdin, but I do want to send them kudos for holding Mayor Villaraigosa to his promise. While I do believe the no-kill shelter policy issue is a complicated one, we can do better than we're doing, and Mr. Villaraigosa promised to pay attention to this issue if he became mayor (excerpt):
'If he made commitments when running, he has to listen to them,' said Councilman Dennis Zine. 'I think having a dialogue with them is good -- it's when you don't speak to people that it gets worse.'Good for Ms. Knaan for weighing in with that.
Deborah Knaan, a city Animal Services commissioner, said she thought it was helpful for Villaraigosa to meet with the activists.
A deputy district attorney who has served on the Animal Services Commission for the last year, Knaan said the activists are a strident minority, but she said many Angelenos are deeply concerned about how the city handles its animal issues and she agreed that too many dogs are euthanized.
"We have a long, long way to go in improving how we do business as a Department of Animal Services in this city," she said.
Some seriously animal-friendly people in this story, and I'm sure our mayor will see the light.
The article mentions that he doesn't want to be send bending to potential influences that might engage in illegal activities, pointing out a relationship between The Animal Defense League Los Angeles and the "domestic terror organization" Animal Liberation Front (ADL basically passes on communiques it receives from the ALF).
This is one reason I push so strongly to avoid illegal activities and to be careful about associating with those that don't. If you want a seat at the table, you can't give people in power an easy reason to keep you away from it.
If ADL speaks for the people of Los Angeles (the mayor's constituents), it's a lot stronger than if the ADL speaks for the ALF. I'm not saying they are, but that's a concern some have expressed, and it just goes to show how careful and concerned activists need to be if they're going to change things at the highest levels.
The public will support animal activists. We are, after all, the public.
And any animal-friendly person wants to see animals treated better and does not want to see them killed for no good reason. As long as activists hew to that, and stay away from intimidation, they will succeed. Because the more the public knows about how animals are being treated, the more the animals win.
High Court strips animal rights activists of assets
Posted by Eric @ 2:22 AM
Britain, UK news from The Times and The Sunday Times - Times Online: High Court strips animal rights activists of assets
More pro-business reporting on the AR world by The Times Online (excerpt):
More pro-business reporting on the AR world by The Times Online (excerpt):
COMPANIES under pressure from animal rights protesters won a landmark High Court victory yesterday which paves the way for the seizure of activists’ funds.Not very, say... journalistic to make such editorial comments, but clearly serial harrassment was involved in tactics against HLS and others. I don't condone most of the more aggressive and intimidating tactics favored by some, but I do worry that this type of finance-theft-by-law could pilfer even more funds from legitimate groups, whose members donated those funds expressly for the animals. That money should not go to those companies, as it goes against everything those contributors were donating it for.
The unprecedented ruling gave Huntingdon Life Sciences permission to empty the bank account of London Animal Action, heralding the enforcement of a new tactic against the assets owned by protesters.
It is thought to be the first time that the finances of an animal rights organisation have been appropriated by one of its targets.
Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS), Britain’s largest research laboratory, has suffered relentless intimidation (italics mine).
Six-year-old boy shoots, wounds father on Canadian hunting trip
Posted by Eric @ 2:18 AM
SeattlePi.com: Six-year-old boy shoots, wounds father on Canadian hunting trip
The child shouldn't have been hunting because the age limit is 10, even with adult supervision, conservation officer Kelly Dahl said.I can think of another reason why he shouldn't have been hunting...
Friday, October 21, 2005
Make way for a national pet policy
Posted by Eric @ 9:13 PM
csmonitor.com | Commentary | Jeffrey ShafferMake way for a national pet policy
"Make way for a national pet policy?" Sounds good to me.
What I like most about this commentary, though it loses strength the longer it goes on, is the observation that animals are generally viewed in society almost entirely from an economic perspective outside our own homes (though I do hear people discussing whether they should put an animal down or give it the $3,000 surgery).
National pet policy sounds like code for animal rights. I like it.
Excerpt:
"Make way for a national pet policy?" Sounds good to me.
What I like most about this commentary, though it loses strength the longer it goes on, is the observation that animals are generally viewed in society almost entirely from an economic perspective outside our own homes (though I do hear people discussing whether they should put an animal down or give it the $3,000 surgery).
National pet policy sounds like code for animal rights. I like it.
Excerpt:
PORTLAND, ORE. – For years, I've been wondering when pets would enter the realm of policy discussion and political debates. The news media generally treats this subject as a business story because Americans now spend massive amounts of money on pet-related products and services.
Our furry friends are everywhere. Two dogs and a cat are lounging around my home right now. But while their emotional and economic impact on individual households is significant and ongoing, pets have not risen to the level of "hot button issue" on the national scene. No reporter has ever stood up during a presidential debate and said, "Senator, should leash laws be mandatory in every city?" Historically, candidates haven't considered pet owners as a voting bloc worthy of tailored slogans and other special attention.
Hurricane Katrina may have changed everything.
Activists protest on campus
Posted by Eric @ 9:04 PM
The Daily Bruin: Activists protest on campus
Last Chance for Animals is quoted in the article linked above about their protests at UCLA over animal research, focusing in particular about one ridiculous study designed to keep a researcher in his job at the university more than it is to benefit humanity.
Sometimes I wonder how hard it is to convince one's self that these studies are worth the cost to the animals. Alan Page Fiske's justification for this experiment submitted to the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies a year ago avoids the obvious fact that it ultimately doesn't have any immediate, practical value, and certainly no life-saving components to justify the harm that could be caused to animals by experimenting on them with drugs...
Last Chance for Animals is quoted in the article linked above about their protests at UCLA over animal research, focusing in particular about one ridiculous study designed to keep a researcher in his job at the university more than it is to benefit humanity.
Sometimes I wonder how hard it is to convince one's self that these studies are worth the cost to the animals. Alan Page Fiske's justification for this experiment submitted to the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies a year ago avoids the obvious fact that it ultimately doesn't have any immediate, practical value, and certainly no life-saving components to justify the harm that could be caused to animals by experimenting on them with drugs...
Dining with compassion
Posted by Eric @ 3:07 PM
New Zealand's Stuff.co.nz: Dining with compassion
Great start to this excellent story in New Zealand, apparently one of the largest consumers of animal protein:
The article includes this photo:
I thought this was legitimate, though the comparison might bother some:
Similar to how businesses respond to the marketplace, I believe the marketplace responds to external pressures that eventually force them to face a need for change that they might have been trying to ignore. Myself and many of my readers came to vegetarianism at our own time and pace, and for varous reasons, but at some point, vegetarianism will become less of a "light bulb" moment, and more of a necessity. It already has for some people, and the pressures seem to be growing:
Great start to this excellent story in New Zealand, apparently one of the largest consumers of animal protein:
Twenty-five years after Anna Mumford got a job in a slaughterhouse, it's not the smell or the blood that she remembers. It's the fear. She's haunted by the look in the eyes of petrified cows being herded into sheds to be shot in the head.
It's an image that changed her life. Overnight she stopped eating meat, and soon after became a strict vegan, masticating nothing derived from animals and using no animal-based products.
Mumford's story is typical of many who choose to adopt a vegan or vegetarian life-style. It could be described as a "lightbulb" moment - a defining event from which there is no turning back.
Mumford grew up in a typical English farming community and was an unquestioning meat-eater when she made the change.
The article includes this photo:
I thought this was legitimate, though the comparison might bother some:
Like born-again Christians who want to spread the word after they've been "saved", there's a risk that Mumford and her peers could alienate the public they're trying to reach. It's a pitfall she's all too aware of, but insists that no holier-than-thou preaching or shock tactics are being employed in conveying the cruelty-free message.The difference is great between Christianity and veganism, obviously, and the point is well made in the second paragraph. I do believe one problem veg*nism has as a movement is helping people interested in veg*nism do it well, so as to reduce "recidivism" and annoying articles from ex-so-called-vegetarians. It's not any one vegetarians fault, but rather the fault of a society that does not yet fully embrace vegetarianism as a legitimate option. It is growing, but there's still a lot of ignorance out there, and it can indeed be daunting for new veggies to make the lifestyle work on their own. I personally recommend massive Internet time in the first few months -- message boards, vegweb.com for recipes, etc. -- to help you get past the learning curve quicker.
"I'm not telling people what to do. We believe that the more information someone has, the better their ability to make a decision. They might think they'd like to stop eating meat, but they don't know what to eat, so they just go and buy the meat again.
Similar to how businesses respond to the marketplace, I believe the marketplace responds to external pressures that eventually force them to face a need for change that they might have been trying to ignore. Myself and many of my readers came to vegetarianism at our own time and pace, and for varous reasons, but at some point, vegetarianism will become less of a "light bulb" moment, and more of a necessity. It already has for some people, and the pressures seem to be growing:
"It seems we're really on the cusp of something at the moment," Blake says. "The news is appalling with bird flu and everything that's happening with global warming, and people are slowly starting to see the cost of the massive destruction we're causing to the earth.
"We don't have time to sit back and wonder what we're going to do about it. Heart disease, cancer and the obesity epidemic are all linked to a meat-based diet. As people get sicker and fatter, the information about a plant-based diet will gradually get out there."
Farmers, SPCA build bridges at meeting
Posted by Eric @ 5:03 AM
Flamborough Review: Farmers, SPCA build bridges at meeting
In related news, the animals get shafted... This is more like The Flim-Famborough Review.
I still have a hard time dealing with how the Jim Sykes of the SPCA can say, "Our concern is with the animal," and reconcile it with this:
In related news, the animals get shafted... This is more like The Flim-Famborough Review.
I still have a hard time dealing with how the Jim Sykes of the SPCA can say, "Our concern is with the animal," and reconcile it with this:
"We're a middle of the road animal welfare agency," he said. "Animal rights people may say no-one should eat beef or wear leather shoes. We understand that animals are used for work on farms or raised to be eaten. We just ask that when they're slaughtered, it be done humanely, and that they be raised humanely."
Audit Says Animal Welfare Officials Lax
Posted by Eric @ 4:59 AM
Newsday.com: Audit Says Animal Welfare Officials Lax
And this is one reason why animal "welfare" is a slippery slope (excerpt):
And this is one reason why animal "welfare" is a slippery slope (excerpt):
The Eastern region is not aggressively pursuing those who violate the law, investigators said. Their audit found that the number of referrals for investigation dropped from 209 annually in 2002 and 2003 to just 82 in 2004.
During those years, the Eastern region issued 38 fines for $88,001, compared to the Western region's 143 fines for $187,060, auditors said.
It also said regional managers declined to act against 126 of 475 violators that were referred for investigation. In the western region, managers declined to act against 18 of 439 violators.
What should you do with your pet?
Posted by Eric @ 4:38 AM
NBC2 News (SW Florida): What should you do with your pet?
Obvious tips, maybe, but a good reminder not to wait until the last minute. It never hurts to have a plan. After a neighbor had a fire, I made plans for evacuating my home with my companion animals, and that gave me peace of mind in the wake of that nerve-wracking event.
Excerpt:
Obvious tips, maybe, but a good reminder not to wait until the last minute. It never hurts to have a plan. After a neighbor had a fire, I made plans for evacuating my home with my companion animals, and that gave me peace of mind in the wake of that nerve-wracking event.
Excerpt:
"You need to make the same precautions for your animals that you would be making for yourself," said Wright.
Some hotels are pet friendly, but you may have to drive north, maybe even out of state to find them.
If you can't travel with your pets, you may have to board it.
"The second option for your pet is to go ahead and board it, either a kennel or a vet," said Wright.
You just need to make reservations now, before they fill up.
Thursday, October 20, 2005
Fur returns but go with the faux
Posted by Eric @ 1:24 PM
The Scotsman: Fur returns but go with the faux
Well, this is cool. The article is quite direct in favoring faux fur and calling real fur, cruel (excerpt):
Well, this is cool. The article is quite direct in favoring faux fur and calling real fur, cruel (excerpt):
Ten years ago, such a brazen display of animal cruelty in the name of fashion would have been unthinkable, but supermodels and designers alike now appear to have embraced what was the dirty secret of fashion with gusto.Thumbs up for this!
However, for the masses, wearing fur will never be acceptable. Indeed a recent survey for Cosmopolitan magazine showed that 91 per cent of women will never wear pelts no matter how fashion conscious.
Wednesday, October 19, 2005
Raising vegetarian pets
Posted by Eric @ 3:24 PM
The Manitoban Online: Raising vegetarian pets
The Manitoban is a student paper, but don't let the small audience disappoint. I'm happy to see any non-veg paper cover a topic like this (excerpt):
The focus of this particular story is, though, on vegetarian pets, so let's move on:
The Manitoban is a student paper, but don't let the small audience disappoint. I'm happy to see any non-veg paper cover a topic like this (excerpt):
With the Dietitians of Canada reporting that approximately four per cent of adult Canadians are vegetarians, it’s safe to say that a meat-free diet is no longer a lifestyle led only by PETA fanatics. As more and more people grow concerned about nutrition and animal welfare, grocery stores have started to stock more meatless alternatives, and even carnivore havens such as McDonalds and Burger King have added veggie burgers to their menus. But does the inventory of your local pet store meet the demands of the veggie-revolution?I like this opening. I mean, the general mainstream impression of PETA is that they are fanatics, but I've been stating for a long time now that vegetarianism can and must reach beyond the fringe, and that it is. I keep seeing comments like this in the media (like The Wall Street Journal yesterday), and it only encourages me further.
The focus of this particular story is, though, on vegetarian pets, so let's move on:
The findings of a recent survey performed by PETA suggest that it isn’t only vegetarians who should be concerned about what they’re feeding their pets. In an analysis of the health histories of 300 dogs that had been switched to a vegetarian diet, it was found that the longer the dog had been meat-free, the fewer health problems the animal experienced.The article includes a receipe for vegetarian dog biscuits.
However, it isn’t necessarily the consumption of meat that’s the problem, but rather the quality. In addition to the same hormones and antibiotics found in meat sold at the grocery store, the meat that goes into the making of commercial pet foods often comes from diseased or dead animals that have been graded as unsuitable for human consumption. Animal by-products are a common ingredient in many brands of pet food and include organs, blood and bone. Even chicken feathers, once hydrolyzed to form an edible jelly, can be included in pet food and listed as “poultry by-products.” Bearing these in mind, feeding soy protein and cereal grains to your cat or dog doesn’t seem quite so unnatural.
While the survey done by PETA does not meet scientific research standards, the anecdotal evidence is promising. The owners of a dog named Bramble, a 27-year-old border collie from Britain that is considered to be the world’s oldest living dog, credit the animal’s longevity to a strict diet of rice, lentils and organic vegetables. While no conclusive studies exist, it is possible that, regardless of their owner’s ethics, pets may benefit from a meat-free diet.
The Yolk of Oppression: Eggs Are Latest Front in Humane-Food Wars
Posted by Eric @ 2:59 AM
The Wall Street Journal: The Yolk of Oppression: Eggs Are Latest Front in Humane-Food Wars
The Wall Street Journal offers animal activists a two-fer in their October 18th edition. This piece appears on the front page of their Personal Journal section, starting above the fold. It covers a topic frequently appearing here at AAFL, cage-free eggs.
I don't think the article breaks new ground, but it's great to see such issues covered prominently in a paper like this, and so even-handedly. It is nice to see the WSJ take animal activists and their issues so seriously, and points out, as they say, "how animal-welfare issues have moved into the mainstream." (is animal rights next...?)
The article recounts how Whole Foods and Wild Oats have adopted cage-free policies, and how California banned force-feeding of birds to create foie gras, with a number of bills on the table in other states. It even points out how some restaurants only serve veal from less-confined calves (big whoop, I know, but the point is increased consciousness).
It briefly reviews how bird flu could ironically threaten bird freedoms, due to concern that chickens could come into contact with flu-carrying birds outdoors.
Cage-free sales are up, according to the article, which quotes Paul Shapiro from the Humane Society of the United States to paint a picture of the cruelty inherent in battery farming. It includes a counter-quote from the dean of agricultre and natural resources at Michigan State University, who argues that cages are a humane way to raise hens, "as long as some changes are made" to the system.
New guidelines he developed have been adopted by 80% of U.S. egg farmers, calling for an average space increase of 14 square inches (surface area) per bird for now, with the total eventually reaching 76 square inches. Not to knock WSJ's reporting, but they fail to note that the area of one piece of letter-sized paper is only about 93 square inches. That's right -- birds will go from having just over half a sheet of paper to live out their miserable lives to having just under one sheet of paper...
WOW. Now that's progress... Sooo much more humane. And this is why "animal welfare" is often a joke.
The Wall Street Journal offers animal activists a two-fer in their October 18th edition. This piece appears on the front page of their Personal Journal section, starting above the fold. It covers a topic frequently appearing here at AAFL, cage-free eggs.
I don't think the article breaks new ground, but it's great to see such issues covered prominently in a paper like this, and so even-handedly. It is nice to see the WSJ take animal activists and their issues so seriously, and points out, as they say, "how animal-welfare issues have moved into the mainstream." (is animal rights next...?)
The article recounts how Whole Foods and Wild Oats have adopted cage-free policies, and how California banned force-feeding of birds to create foie gras, with a number of bills on the table in other states. It even points out how some restaurants only serve veal from less-confined calves (big whoop, I know, but the point is increased consciousness).
It briefly reviews how bird flu could ironically threaten bird freedoms, due to concern that chickens could come into contact with flu-carrying birds outdoors.
Cage-free sales are up, according to the article, which quotes Paul Shapiro from the Humane Society of the United States to paint a picture of the cruelty inherent in battery farming. It includes a counter-quote from the dean of agricultre and natural resources at Michigan State University, who argues that cages are a humane way to raise hens, "as long as some changes are made" to the system.
New guidelines he developed have been adopted by 80% of U.S. egg farmers, calling for an average space increase of 14 square inches (surface area) per bird for now, with the total eventually reaching 76 square inches. Not to knock WSJ's reporting, but they fail to note that the area of one piece of letter-sized paper is only about 93 square inches. That's right -- birds will go from having just over half a sheet of paper to live out their miserable lives to having just under one sheet of paper...
WOW. Now that's progress... Sooo much more humane. And this is why "animal welfare" is often a joke.
Pressed to Shed Fur, British Royal Guards Find Bear a Necessity
Posted by Eric @ 2:58 AM
The Wall Street Journal: Pressed to Shed Fur, British Royal Guards Find Bear a Necessity (subscription required)
This was a front page article (above the fold, and with a photo of a PETA activist wearing a bear costume and "save my skin!" PETA sign while standing next to one of the British Royal Guards). I know it's a pain to try to track down previous day's WSJ or to pay to access it at their site, but know that it was there, and it was quite an even-handed article, which was nice. It was even nice to see that positive changes have already been made:
This was a front page article (above the fold, and with a photo of a PETA activist wearing a bear costume and "save my skin!" PETA sign while standing next to one of the British Royal Guards). I know it's a pain to try to track down previous day's WSJ or to pay to access it at their site, but know that it was there, and it was quite an even-handed article, which was nice. It was even nice to see that positive changes have already been made:
Over the past three decades, [Britain's Ministry of Defense] has found artificial alternatives for army drummers' leopard-skin hats and for the beaver-fur caps worn by Royal Horse Artillery.This is one of PETA's more friendly press appearances:
In an unusual twist, PETA has become a sort of politically correct fashion consultant to the army, hunting down some faux bearskin and handing over samples to the ministry. Col. Suchanek in March put two hats made from the material atop guards outside Buckingham Palace as part of a two-year trial.Good for them! I still don't see what's politically so correct about taking such politically unpopular positions. I have to quote Inigo Montoya from The Princess Bride, "I do not think that word means what you think it means."
Issue of 'kill' and 'no-kill' shelters not so clear-cut
Posted by Eric @ 2:57 AM
The Tufts Daily: Issue of 'kill' and 'no-kill' shelters not so clear-cut
This is a companion article in the Tufts Daily to the previous article I posted about euthanasia, which looks at the ugly truth behind no-kill shelters. It's not a clear-cut problem, indeed. As the previous piece points out, the solution lies in preventing animals from winding up at shelters in the first place.
Excerpt:
This is a companion article in the Tufts Daily to the previous article I posted about euthanasia, which looks at the ugly truth behind no-kill shelters. It's not a clear-cut problem, indeed. As the previous piece points out, the solution lies in preventing animals from winding up at shelters in the first place.
Excerpt:
"What's interesting is that the 'kill' shelters say that by not accepting these extra animals, the 'no-kill' shelters are forcing the 'kill' shelters to do the euthanasia for them," said Sarah Cornetto, who is currently studying for her master's of science in Animals and Public Policy at the Cummings Center.
Animal euthanasia is controversial but historically-rooted
Posted by Eric @ 2:54 AM
The Tufts Daily: Animal euthanasia is controversial but historically-rooted
Well, I'm not one to care about historical roots for anything, except to learn from history and avoid making the same mistakes. That said, it would seem that this is the gist of this Tufts Daily article:
Well, I'm not one to care about historical roots for anything, except to learn from history and avoid making the same mistakes. That said, it would seem that this is the gist of this Tufts Daily article:
'I think even in best case scenario, there are always going to be a certain number of animals that will find their way to a shelter,' [Annette Rauch] said.
'We just want to minimize that number and try to have people understand that it's a big commitment and it's a lifetime commitment to have a pet,' Rauch said. 'It's not okay to get a cat and two years later treat it like a sweater, where you can get rid of it if you don't like it anymore, and if you want another one you can get it.'
Tuesday, October 18, 2005
Warning on nutrition claims as watchdog says Nestle ad misleading
Posted by Eric @ 2:57 PM
FoodNavigator.com | Europe: Warning on nutrition claims as watchdog says Nestle ad misleading
Finally! Go vegan power:
Finally! Go vegan power:
The Vegan Society and a member of the public approached the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) about a claim made in an Nestle advertorial on AOL's website.Now if we could only get more of this kind of thing happening in the U.S., where Big Dairy is even more of a fighter and has more friends in power.
One paragraph in the advert was headed "Dairy Products" and stated "Essential for healthy bones ...".
Aimed at women and featuring Nestle's Sveltesse Optimise dairy drink complainants objected to the ad, claiming it was misleading because 'it is not necessary to eat dairy products to obtain healthy bones.'
The ASA ruled that the use of the word "essential" implied dairy products were the only source of calcium.
“We concluded that the advertorial was likely to mislead and advised Nestlé to amend the claim,” said the watchdog.
Going meatless -- or close to it
Posted by Eric @ 2:50 PM
delawareonline | The News Journal: Going meatless -- or close to it
This article is notable for its extremely positive -- and inclusive -- portrayal of vegetarianism. I know some people won't appreciate that inclusion of limited meat eaters in the category of vegetarianism, and I find the idea of carno-vegetarians laughable, but on the whole this article is quite good.
I'll briefly address the meat aspect with this quote from the article:
The article also goes to great length to demonstrate all the health benefits of a vegetarian diet, and quotes Suzanne Havala Hobbs a few times, including my favorite refrain:
Toward the end of the article are numerous suggestions for pursuing a vegetarian diet. I went vegan cold-tofurkey. I prefer that method, as I believe closing the door on animal-based products entirely reduces the lingering impact they have on you psychologically, and the physical changes are more obvious with this type of change. What made this type of radical dietary shift easier for me was the substitution of fake meats and dairy, as well as egg substitutes. I relied on these items to eat bounteously and to avoid a diet that relied on the absence of foods. Over time, I learned new recipes, and the meat replacements fell to the wayside, with seitan, tofu, and tempeh being an element of some of my meals, while only very rarely allowing the more processed meat analogues into my diet. This type of transition, more or less echoed by the article, is one I can heartily recommend.
Where this article ultimately fails after being so important is in suggesting that eating meat is finding balance, even after stating that most nutritionists generally agree that eating meat is not necessary:
However, that one bit doesn't derail the entire article. I frequently mention that vegetarianism is currently in an important phase. This phase may be difficult for hardcore vegetarians, who may feel their label is being weakened, but it is not. Modifiers are just what it says they are: modifiers. Yeah, if a pesco-vegetarian simply calls him or herself a vegetarian without the pesco part, that is going to confuse some people, but I see the day when waiters don't get confused by that, and will even anticipate the consumer better due to a wider acceptance and understanding of what vegetarianism is.
In my mind, it is important that 290 million people reduce their meat intake to even just the maximum recommended daily amount, even if only another 2.9 million cut it out altogether. You have to examine these numbers and realize just how massive a change in our world that would really be.
Including these people -- flexitarians and other quasi-vegetarians -- in our lives, welcoming them to a more vegetarian, more animal-friendly lifestyle, even if not entirely animal-free, is important toward completing this phase of the movement. The next phase -- the majority of the civilized world going veggie -- is not going is not going to happen until positive portrayals of vegetarianism are taken for granted, and the true costs of animal products are felt by all. Remember, the longer people pursue a vegetarian lifestyle (and I think this holds true even for semi-vegetarians), the more likely they are to consider and go in for the moral argument for vegetarianism.
On that note, I'd have preferred to end the article with this sentiment:
This article is notable for its extremely positive -- and inclusive -- portrayal of vegetarianism. I know some people won't appreciate that inclusion of limited meat eaters in the category of vegetarianism, and I find the idea of carno-vegetarians laughable, but on the whole this article is quite good.
I'll briefly address the meat aspect with this quote from the article:
While the inclusion of occasional meat-eaters may rankle some purists, most health experts agree that any diet that emphasizes more vegetables, fruit and whole grains can only be a good thing.From a health standpoint, that's absolutely true. And when more of those foods are included in a diet, it leaves less room for meat, so that would indeed be progress. Staying with the health angle for now, which is the primary thrust of the article, it starts off with a fairly common type of transitional person, the health vegetarian. This one became a raw foodist over time:
"I figured why eat meat if I don't have to?" the 31-year-old mother of three said recently while shopping at the Newark Natural Foods Cooperative.Those numbers seem to match the most common ones I've seen, with the limiting meat intake usually being fish and poultry, and still in the minority, compared to the rest of their diet. Would I like them to stop eating meat altogether? Sure, but I also have to recognize that this is a critical stage:
More people than ever are asking that same question. According to a 2003 survey from the Vegetarian Resource Group, nearly 3 percent of American adults don't eat meat, poultry or seafood. Other polls find that as many as 10 million Americans claim to be vegetarians -- which can include everything from following a no-meat diet to limiting meat intake to certain types.
Being a vegetarian used to mean enduring suspicious stares and questions, said John Cunningham, consumer research manager for the Vegetarian Resource Group, a Baltimore-based educational nonprofit organization.I do have to say I find it amusing when a meat-eater doesn't get defensive, but rather "congratulates" me for my decision to be vegan. That said, I have noticed the growing sentiment that vegetarianism is not just for kooks, despite the last bastion of animal exploiters clinging to their ways. Even I thought vegetarians were kooks, before I came to it on my own. In the past few years, there's been a tidal shift, and that's helped in no small part by all the mainstream vegetarian offerings in stores:
But that's changed. Being a vegetarian has taken on a positive connotation, so much so that some meat-eaters go so far as to call themselves "semi-vegetarians." Other meat-eaters look on vegetarians with admiration.
Food companies are responding to customer demands with a wide array of products catering to newfound health consciousness. Sales of vegetarian food products have increased 64 percent since 2000 and now total an estimated $1.5 billion, according to market research by Mintel. From 1992 to 2003, sales of soy-based foods have risen from $300 million to $3.9 billion. Even Burger King has come out with a meatless burger.This surge came about right as I made the ethical decision to go vegan, literally overnight. The reasons included the usual environmental, animal, and health arguments, but the most decisive factor was the treatment of animals in confined animal feeding operations and slaughterhouses. The longer I was vegan, the stronger my beliefs were on that subject, and I've found that some vegetarians who originally changed their diets for health reasons have continued their diets for ethical reasons, so this didn't surprise me:
There are two primary groups of vegetarians. One is motivated by health, the other by moral issues. Some also point to environmental concerns for a vegetarian diet: Raising meat uses more land and resources than planting crops. Others don't eat meat for religious reasons.
The longer people stick with vegetarianism the more likely they are to accept the moral argument for it, said Dr. Paul Rozin, professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania.
The article also goes to great length to demonstrate all the health benefits of a vegetarian diet, and quotes Suzanne Havala Hobbs a few times, including my favorite refrain:
Coke and french fries are vegetarian, but that doesn't make them a healthy food choice
Toward the end of the article are numerous suggestions for pursuing a vegetarian diet. I went vegan cold-tofurkey. I prefer that method, as I believe closing the door on animal-based products entirely reduces the lingering impact they have on you psychologically, and the physical changes are more obvious with this type of change. What made this type of radical dietary shift easier for me was the substitution of fake meats and dairy, as well as egg substitutes. I relied on these items to eat bounteously and to avoid a diet that relied on the absence of foods. Over time, I learned new recipes, and the meat replacements fell to the wayside, with seitan, tofu, and tempeh being an element of some of my meals, while only very rarely allowing the more processed meat analogues into my diet. This type of transition, more or less echoed by the article, is one I can heartily recommend.
Where this article ultimately fails after being so important is in suggesting that eating meat is finding balance, even after stating that most nutritionists generally agree that eating meat is not necessary:
"My personal experience has been that this is never all or none," said Eleanor Pella, public health nutrition consultant for the Pennsylvania Department of Health and coordinator of the state's 5-a-Day fruit and vegetables program. "We need to think in a more holistic approach. A little bit of animal is not going to kill you."No, but it will kill the animals, and not in a "natural" way, so the "circle of life" argument doesn't fly here, either. This type of attitude is one reason that, while I do encourage the health argument for vegetarianism, the animal-friendly person in me wants people to go vegetarian in a healthy way for the animals.
However, that one bit doesn't derail the entire article. I frequently mention that vegetarianism is currently in an important phase. This phase may be difficult for hardcore vegetarians, who may feel their label is being weakened, but it is not. Modifiers are just what it says they are: modifiers. Yeah, if a pesco-vegetarian simply calls him or herself a vegetarian without the pesco part, that is going to confuse some people, but I see the day when waiters don't get confused by that, and will even anticipate the consumer better due to a wider acceptance and understanding of what vegetarianism is.
This intermingling of the vegetarian and meat-eating worlds is becoming commonplace. Even food co-ops -- vegetarian sanctums that they are -- find themselves selling organic meat products.
"It's become a controversial issue over the years, but to me it's about giving the customers what they want," said Bill Zietlow, general manager of the Newark co-op. The way Zietlow sees it, selling meat is a way to bring more people into the fold and encourage them to eat more organic, healthy foods. As a result, some might make the leap to complete vegetarianism, he said.
In my mind, it is important that 290 million people reduce their meat intake to even just the maximum recommended daily amount, even if only another 2.9 million cut it out altogether. You have to examine these numbers and realize just how massive a change in our world that would really be.
Including these people -- flexitarians and other quasi-vegetarians -- in our lives, welcoming them to a more vegetarian, more animal-friendly lifestyle, even if not entirely animal-free, is important toward completing this phase of the movement. The next phase -- the majority of the civilized world going veggie -- is not going is not going to happen until positive portrayals of vegetarianism are taken for granted, and the true costs of animal products are felt by all. Remember, the longer people pursue a vegetarian lifestyle (and I think this holds true even for semi-vegetarians), the more likely they are to consider and go in for the moral argument for vegetarianism.
On that note, I'd have preferred to end the article with this sentiment:
Cotugna said vegetarianism is likely to grow. "It's a movement, more than a fad as it may have been at one time," she said.
Author of 'Eternal Treblinka' Returns His Graduate Degrees to Columbia University to Protest Its Horrific Experiments on Animals
Posted by Eric @ 2:14 PM
PRESS RELEASE: Author of 'Eternal Treblinka' Returns His Graduate Degrees to Columbia University to Protest Its Horrific Experiments on Animals
Charles Patterson, PhD, has issued a press release... Notice all the plugs for his book at the end (ostensibly providing credentials for the media, rather than public consumption). We'll see how many media outlets take the bait and run with this. I'm more than happy to. Good for him.
You can link to the PDF above, but I'm pasting the whole thing below for you:
Charles Patterson, PhD, has issued a press release... Notice all the plugs for his book at the end (ostensibly providing credentials for the media, rather than public consumption). We'll see how many media outlets take the bait and run with this. I'm more than happy to. Good for him.
You can link to the PDF above, but I'm pasting the whole thing below for you:
Author of 'Eternal Treblinka' Returns His Graduate Degrees to Columbia University to Protest Its Horrific Experiments on Animals
This week Charles Patterson, author of 'Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust,' is returning his M.A. in English to Columbia University to protest his alma mater's ongoing mistreatment of animals in its labs. It's the second graduate degree he has returned in 2005. Last spring on the day before the Columbia Commencement Patterson returned his Ph.D. in Religion to the Office of University President Lee Bollinger for the same reason.
(PRWEB) October 18, 2005 -- This week Charles Patterson, author of "Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust," is returning his Master's degree to Columbia University to protest its ongoing mistreatment of animals in its labs.
His M.A. was in English (his concentration was 17th century literature and his advisor was Charles Van Doren). The title of his thesis was "Milton, Dryden and the Epic." It's the second one of his graduate degrees that Patterson is returning in 2005.
On Tuesday, May 17 at 11am--the day before the 251st Columbia Commencement--then Dr. Charles Patterson returned his doctoral degree to the Office of Columbia President Lee Bollinger in Low Library, Room 202, to protest the university's cruelty to animals in its horrific experiments.
Patterson wrote his 320-page doctoral dissertation on "Social Attitudes of Protestant Journals During the Depression of 1893-97" and received his Ph.D. with honors from the Department of Religion in 1970. Since then, he has been a teacher, adjunct professor, therapist, editor, and author of ten books.
His best known book is "Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust" (New York: Lantern Books, 2002), which has now been translated and published in Germany, Italy, Poland, Croatia, and the Czech Republic. The book has also been translated into Hebrew and will soon be published in Israel. http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/5/prweb235481.htm
Patterson, who is a writer of Holocaust books and reviews, is upset by the cruelty practiced at Columbia by Professors Mehmet Oz, E. Sander Connolly, Michel Ferin, Raymond Stark, and the rest of the Columbia vivisectors.
"Dr. Josef Mengele, who conducted experiments on Jews and Gypsies at Auschwitz (he had two doctorates, by the way) would have fit in quite nicely at Columbia," says Patterson. "To paraphrase Theodor Adorno, the German Jewish philosopher who fled Nazi Germany, 'Auschwitz begins wherever somebody looks at a Columbia lab and thinks: they're only animals.'"
The title of Patterson's book comes from the Yiddish writer and Nobel Laureate, Isaac Bashevis Singer, to whom the book is dedicated. He was the first major modern author to describe the exploitation and killing of animals in terms of the Holocaust. "In relation to them, all people are Nazis," he wrote, "for animals it is an eternal Treblinka." (Treblinka was the Nazi death camp north of Warsaw.)
Patterson says his book, which examines the common roots of animal and human oppression and the similarities between how the Nazis treated their victims and how our society treats animals, is behind his decision to return his degrees. "I worked hard for my Master's and doctorate," he says, "but the lives of the innocent and helpless are more important than a couple of pieces of paper."
Columbia's attitude toward the exploitation of animals reminds Patterson of what the late AIDS and animal activist Steven Simmons described as the attitude of society as a whole: "Animals are innocent casualties of the world view that asserts that some lives are more valuable than others, that the powerful are entitled to exploit the powerless, and that the weak must be sacrificed for the greater good."
Here is just one very brief glimpse behind the curtain of secrecy at Columbia: "In Columbia's labs, animals are left in cages to die, without veterinary care, after having their eyes removed and clamps applied through their empty eye sockets to restrict the blood supply to their brains."
Patterson believes that one of the most important lessons of the Holocaust is that we must never again remain silent in the face of evil. In the words of Auschwitz survivor and Nobel Laureate Elie Wiesel, "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented."
After Patterson returned his doctorate to Columbia last spring, he wrote to the members of the Columbia Board of Trustees, but so far neither the university nor its trustees has addressed his concerns.
"Unfortunately, the torture of animals in Columbia's labs seems to be 'eternal.' But perhaps if enough alumni/ae withhold their financial contributions and return their degrees, the university will wake up from its ethical slumber and take action. Had my B.A. been from Columbia College instead of Amherst College, I would return that degree too."
For more information about Columbia's animal experiments visit http://www.columbiacruelty.com
"It's a matter of taking the side of the weak against the strong, something the best people have always done." --Harriet Beecher Stowe, author of Uncle Tom's Cabin
Below is a sampling of reactions from around the world to Patterson's book:
"The moral challenge posed by Eternal Treblinka turns it into a must for anyone who seeks to delve into the universal lesson of the Holocaust."
--Maariv (Israeli newspaper)
"You must read this carefully documented book."
--La Stampa (Italian national newspaper)
"Important and timely...written with great sensitivity and compassion...I hope that Eternal Treblinka will be widely read."
--Martyrdom and Resistance (Holocaust publication), New York
"Charles Patterson's book will go a long way towards righting the terrible wrongs that human beings, throughout history, have perpetrated on non-human animals. I urge you to read it and think deeply about its important message."
--Dr. Jane Goodall, United Kingdom
"Necessary reading matter...very thought-provoking."
--Süddeutsche Zeitung, Germany
"Eternal Treblinka is an eye-opening, thought-provoking book that I highly recommend."
--The Gantseh Megillah, Montreal, Canada
"Patterson's book sheds light on the violence perpetuated every day against animals and humans alike so that we might one day put an end to it."
--Moment ("America's Premier Independent Jewish Magazine")
"A thorough and thought-provoking book"
--Ha'aretz (Israeli newspaper)
"Compelling, controversial, iconoclastic...strongly recommended...a unique contribution."
--Midwest Book Review, USA
"Eternal Treblinka disturbs us because (inevitably though tactfully) it holds up to us, its readers, a clear mirror to look at ourselves anew...Kafka would have applauded Eternal Treblinka. It grips like a thriller."
--The Freethinker, United Kingdom
"...promises to be one of the most influential books of the 21st century."
--Dr. Karen Davis, United Poultry Concerns
"The book that breaks all taboos. The book that fires up controversies all over the world."
--Prijatelji Zivotinja, Zagreb, Croatia
To visit the website featuring Charles Patterson's book, go to http://www.powerfulbook.com
###
Welfare Bill for animals could lead to ban on circus elephants
Posted by Eric @ 1:10 AM
Telegraph | News: Welfare Bill for animals could lead to ban on circus elephants
Progress for animals in the UK, though it falls short of changes that address the root of all this, our subjugation of them (excerpt):
More specifics on the bill here.
Progress for animals in the UK, though it falls short of changes that address the root of all this, our subjugation of them (excerpt):
The Bill, a draft of which was published last year, introduces a duty on those responsible for animals to do all that is reasonable to ensure their welfare.Welfare laws can only take mankind so far in its treatment of animals, but well-enforced welfare laws are an improvement over what we have, and fortunately this bill allows for secondary legislation that will keep the country "with the times." One day, I do hope we look back on this era with some disgust for our barbarous treatment of animals.
Many animal welfare groups believe the keeping of large wild animals, such as elephants, in circuses will be ended by the courts if that duty is enforced.
The form in which the Bill has emerged will allow ministers to set statutory codes of conduct, for example for game rearing, at a later date.
Mr Bradshaw said groups such as the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, which have campaigned for a total ban on the keeping of large wild animals in circuses, "need not be too despondent".
He said: ''Much of what they want to achieve will be made possible by the Bill." A new code of conduct governing circuses might take another two or three years but "certain practices could be deemed inimical to good welfare" with immediate effect once the Bill was passed.
Livery yards, pet fairs, pet shops, cat and dog boarding establishments will all require a licence under the Bill, which seeks to modernise powers currently set out in 22 separate Acts of Parliament.
The Bill, which only applies in England and Wales, will ban all mutilation of animals, such as the cropping of dogs' ears, calves' tongues and horses' tails.
However, there will be an exemption for castrating and spaying cats and dogs or ear-tagging cattle.
More specifics on the bill here.
Monday, October 17, 2005
News-Record.com - Greensboro, North Carolina: : Born to be wild: Pets or predators?
Posted by Eric @ 9:24 PM
News-Record.com: Born to be wild: Pets or predators?
This could be talking about zoos, but it's part of an article on typically wild animals showing up all over as pets (excerpt):
This could be talking about zoos, but it's part of an article on typically wild animals showing up all over as pets (excerpt):
A creature used to roaming, say, endless grasslands, isn't so happy left to roam somebody's basement.
Wild animals need conditions similar to those they would be accustomed to in the wild, Preiss said. In captivity, "it's no wonder they go a little crazy."
Bison hunt aggravates opponents
Posted by Eric @ 7:33 PM
Helena Independent Record: Bison hunt aggravates opponents
Another example to demonstrate that hunting is no sport.
Another example to demonstrate that hunting is no sport.
These bison have no fear of people and will stand and stare in curiosity as they are gunned down
Ag at Large: Activists act, but they don't ‘get it'
Posted by Eric @ 7:30 PM
The Porterville Recorder: Ag at Large: Activists act, but they don't ‘get it'
No, you don't get it. Don Curlee clearly doesn't understand the whole point of what animal activists are doing (excerpt):
No, you don't get it. Don Curlee clearly doesn't understand the whole point of what animal activists are doing (excerpt):
What the activists failed (or refused) to understand is that chickens such as these, referred to as ”spent“ hens in the poultry industry, are normally part of the nation's food supply.Um, no. They do understand, which is why they rescued the animals. I mean, duh. This guy really is clueless. He goes on:
Nothing in the poultry science text books indicates that exercise, scratching and pecking for grubs, worms, insects and other tasty morsels enhances egg quality or egg laying ability or the attitude and psyche of the hens.Nor do we care. We're more concerned about the quality of life for animals than we are about economic efficiency. I mean, Curlee really has no understanding at all of the animal activist viewpoint and, therefore, has zero standing to criticize the movement.
Possible indication of BSE in Idaho?
Posted by Eric @ 6:13 PM
Many thanks to a reader who linked the following story:
BREITBART.com (AP): 9 Cases of Brain-Wasting Disease in Idaho
(please let me know when sending links whether you want to be referred to by name)
No one's leaping to mad cow conclusions just yet, but this is a higher incidence of CJD than usual, and it begs close scrutiny (excerpt):
BREITBART.com (AP): 9 Cases of Brain-Wasting Disease in Idaho
(please let me know when sending links whether you want to be referred to by name)
No one's leaping to mad cow conclusions just yet, but this is a higher incidence of CJD than usual, and it begs close scrutiny (excerpt):
Normally, sporadic CJD only strikes about one person in a million each year, with an average of just 300 cases per year in the United States, or just over one case a year in Idaho. Over the past two decades, the most cases reported in Idaho in a single year has been three.
Until this year.
Of the nine suspected cases reported so far in 2005, three tested positive for an infectious disease of the nervous system, though more tests are pending to determine if the fatal illness was in fact sporadic CJD. Four apparent victims were buried without autopsies. Two suspected cases tested negative.
Still, federal and state health officials are stopping just short of calling the Idaho cases a "cluster," waiting for final test results from the victims who got autopsies.
The best tool of investigators to pin down the diagnosis -- the autopsy -- is sometimes hard to get, said Tom Shanahan with the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare.
Pathologists are often reluctant to perform the procedures, the cost of an autopsy can be high and some families are reluctant to give their consent, officials say.
Joan Kingsford wanted an autopsy done on her husband, but no mortician in the area would agree to handle Alvin's body after his brain cavity had been opened. They feared they would catch the rare disease, Kingsford said.
AAFL Podcast for October 17, 2005
Posted by Eric @ 4:56 PM
A big show for you today, as the AAFL companion podcast (MP3) returns to a new schedule. From today forward, I will be posting the podcast on Mondays.
In my latest show, I discuss the end of the OohMahNee farmed animal sanctuary, and the grand opening of Lauri Bauston's Animal Acres, just outside of Los Angeles, CA, as well as their and Farm Sanctuary's Thanksgiving alternatives on November 19th.

I also discuss the growing media frenzy over avian flu, as highlighted by these recent articles:
MSNBC.com: Romania kills thousands of birds amid flu fears, Bird Flu Case Confirmed in Greece and Drug-resistant bird flu found in Vietnamese girl (also includes video and more on bird flu)
Another kind of flu is affecting dogs across the U.S.
In closing, I discuss some articles pertaining to animal rights, including one against AR that misunderstands, like many, what AR is about, and begs the question, does the term "animal rights" actually get in the way of our goals, or should animal liberation (somehow a more frightening term) better fit the bill.
Animals live in a wild kingdom, their instinct is to slaughter and consume. If animals have rights, then at the same time, virtually all animals would be brought up on murder charges because they aggress against other creatures.
The other two are more pro-animal. One is a review of In Defence of Animals (ed. Peter Singer) that reads more like an AR treatise, and the other is a fine editorial in The Washington Post on elephants in zoos from Les Schobert, a man who has been a curator and worked in zoos for 35 years.
(AAC version of podcast)
In my latest show, I discuss the end of the OohMahNee farmed animal sanctuary, and the grand opening of Lauri Bauston's Animal Acres, just outside of Los Angeles, CA, as well as their and Farm Sanctuary's Thanksgiving alternatives on November 19th.

I also discuss the growing media frenzy over avian flu, as highlighted by these recent articles:
MSNBC.com: Romania kills thousands of birds amid flu fears, Bird Flu Case Confirmed in Greece and Drug-resistant bird flu found in Vietnamese girl (also includes video and more on bird flu)
Another kind of flu is affecting dogs across the U.S.
In closing, I discuss some articles pertaining to animal rights, including one against AR that misunderstands, like many, what AR is about, and begs the question, does the term "animal rights" actually get in the way of our goals, or should animal liberation (somehow a more frightening term) better fit the bill.
Animals live in a wild kingdom, their instinct is to slaughter and consume. If animals have rights, then at the same time, virtually all animals would be brought up on murder charges because they aggress against other creatures.
The other two are more pro-animal. One is a review of In Defence of Animals (ed. Peter Singer) that reads more like an AR treatise, and the other is a fine editorial in The Washington Post on elephants in zoos from Les Schobert, a man who has been a curator and worked in zoos for 35 years.
(AAC version of podcast)
Reward mounts in Calif. duck killings
Posted by Eric @ 3:47 AM
The Boston Globe: Reward mounts in Calif. duck killings
I try to avoid posting about various animal cruelty stories anymore (that's a subject without end, especially as the incidence of reporting grows), but this is beyond the pale, and it also highlights how egregious stories can reconnect people to the problem of animal cruelty in a new light (excerpt):
I try to avoid posting about various animal cruelty stories anymore (that's a subject without end, especially as the incidence of reporting grows), but this is beyond the pale, and it also highlights how egregious stories can reconnect people to the problem of animal cruelty in a new light (excerpt):
The killer was brutal, returning again and again with his car to mow down his victims. In a fit of apparent spite, he chased them by foot, then strangled them with his bare hands.
The victims were a flock of pet ducks, a popular attraction at a local car wash in this Silicon Valley town near San Jose, and the outrage has been deep and widespread.
A reward to catch the culprit has grown to $22,000, a hefty sum for an animal cruelty case, as authorities continue to plead for help in apprehending a man whose malice, police worry, could turn to harming people.
''Somebody was obviously very angry," said Campbell Police Captain Russ Patterson. ''This incident could be indicative of something more, perhaps some deep emotional disturbance, some deep, anger-related issues that could lead to something more. And that anger is something that our justice system needs to deal with."
The sentiment has long been echoed by rights groups that have been pressing authorities across the country to take animal cruelty cases more seriously.
''I firmly believe that people who hurt animals will harm people," said Paul Bruce, program coordinator for the West Coast regional office of the Humane Society of the United States, which offers thousands of dollars in reward money every year, including a $2,500 contribution to the Campbell case.
Hunters strive to save a dying sport
Posted by Eric @ 3:40 AM
IndyStar.com: Hunters strive to save a dying sport
I'll start off with the end of this article, which is simply ridiculous:
Just as dumb:
I'll start off with the end of this article, which is simply ridiculous:
'Hunting has gotten a bad name from people who don't know anything about it. . . .This sounds like a cliche, but the thrill of the hunt is more the thrill of the hunt than it is to kill.'So, uh.... don't kill the animals, then?
Just as dumb:
"Two years ago, I can say, I was against anyone killing a deer. But the deer around here have gotten dangerously abundant. . . . I've almost had wrecks."I guess the strategy for reviving hunting is to prey on people that don't understand logic?
Sunday, October 16, 2005
Beware Trojan Horses!
Posted by Eric @ 3:46 AM
American Chronicle: Beware Trojan Horses!
Again with the American Chronicle and a positive focus for the animals! (excerpt, pic at site):
Again with the American Chronicle and a positive focus for the animals! (excerpt, pic at site):
When animal-abusers are caught red-handed, there are two routes they take for damage control. First, they try to suppress the evidence. Then, if that doesn't work, they pretend the abuses are isolated incidents. But in this case the evidence is overwhelming, and neither tactic has worked for Covance so far.Take the time to check out this piece in its entirety.
Covance sought an injunction to prevent PETA Europe from showing the shocking video footage. The judge dismissed the request, calling the video "highly disturbing" and commenting on the "rough manner in which the animals [are] handled and the bleakness of the surroundings in which they are kept," as matters which "cry out for explanation."
Further, the judge held that since Covance "has fostered a misleading impression," PETA is "entitled to correct it publicly," and then ordered Covance to pay PETA for its legal costs. Covance appealed the judge's decision, but the appellate court described their case as an "uphill task," and Covance finally withdrew its appeal. Covance's censorship attempts in the U.S. also failed. The court decisions to date, unequivocally support PETA.
Shortage dooms sanctuary
Posted by Eric @ 3:39 AM
PittsburghLIVE.com: Shortage dooms sanctuary
This is a bit sad. One of my most-worn tees is an OohMahNee tee (excerpt):
I'm glad that the animals are being squared away so well, but sorry to see the loss of another sanctuary. In positive news, Animal Acres is holiding its grand opening this coming week:
Below is an excerpt from a Daily News story covering the opening, as well as the sanctuary itself and its founder, Lorri Bauston (formerly of Farm Sanctuary, w/Gene Bauston):
This is a bit sad. One of my most-worn tees is an OohMahNee tee (excerpt):
"We were always trying to make it work, but then we just realized the donations weren't coming in," Tracy said. "I think it is the state of our economy right now."
Tracy said some animals have already gone to a sanctuary in Montana. Others have been placed and are awaiting transportation to locations throughout the East Coast. Mell said only seven roosters have yet to be placed.
"We think we have a good lead on a sanctuary that may want to take them," Mell said.
I'm glad that the animals are being squared away so well, but sorry to see the loss of another sanctuary. In positive news, Animal Acres is holiding its grand opening this coming week:
With Honorary Chairperson James Cromwell, a host of stars for the animals, and other special guests, the GRAND OPENING is THE event for farm animals — and people who love them! The Grand Opening includes two exciting events: Animal Acres Festival and the 1st Annual Country Gala (please reserve your tickets by October 17). Bring your friends and family to this unique festival of food, fun and farmed animals! Join us for a memorable evening of dining and dancing under the stars in the beautiful sanctuary garden courtyard.
Below is an excerpt from a Daily News story covering the opening, as well as the sanctuary itself and its founder, Lorri Bauston (formerly of Farm Sanctuary, w/Gene Bauston):
The sanctuary has a capacity for up to 250 animals and the event is the beginning of a capital campaign to put the property into the nonprofit group's name.
"We want this to be owned by the animals," she said.
As she led visitors on a tour of the grounds, two 4-month old Jersey bulls mooed from a distant field. As she got closer, accompanied by her sidekick and farm dog Duke, one bull she called "Baby" pushed past the dog to give Bauston a sloppy, wet kiss.
"We rescued them from a stockyard," she said as she stroked his amber fur. "They obviously hadn't had good experiences with people, so we're trying to change that." The second baby bull tried to hide, keeping her distance as Baby stood in the spotlight.
"Our goal in having this sanctuary is to lead by example. People aren't cruel by nature and I actually believe we can change minds by educating them."
Saturday, October 15, 2005
Search for Lost Pets Continues in Louisiana
Posted by Eric @ 4:04 AM
NPR: Search for Lost Pets Continues in Louisiana
It's thrilling to think of all the animals saved, and yet, how many more could have been if our society was more attuned to the importance everyday people place on their companion animals? (excerpt):
It's thrilling to think of all the animals saved, and yet, how many more could have been if our society was more attuned to the importance everyday people place on their companion animals? (excerpt):
A quarter-million dogs and cats were likely left behind in New Orleans as people evacuated during Hurricane Katrina. Only a fraction -- maybe 15,000 -- may have been saved. That's in large part because evacuating animals with their owners was not part of the government emergency response plan.
Friday, October 14, 2005
Vegetarian Awareness Month
Posted by Eric @ 2:43 PM
KXAN.com: Vegetarian Awareness Month
Oh, yeah. By the way, now that we're halfway through October, don't forget that it's vegetarian awareness month. A big part of vegetarian awareness is increase awareness of animal suffering. Hand out as many Vegan Outreach pamphlets as you can, and let people know how easy it is to go vegan. In areas with a large vegan population, be sure to point out nearby, delicious vegan restaurants, especially the quick, inexpensive ones that will appeal to everyday people.
Here's a case in point that inspired this post: food for an animal-friendly population will become more widely available as demand increases, so keep going vegan and making sure your needs are known. The market will follow (excerpt):
Oh, yeah. By the way, now that we're halfway through October, don't forget that it's vegetarian awareness month. A big part of vegetarian awareness is increase awareness of animal suffering. Hand out as many Vegan Outreach pamphlets as you can, and let people know how easy it is to go vegan. In areas with a large vegan population, be sure to point out nearby, delicious vegan restaurants, especially the quick, inexpensive ones that will appeal to everyday people.
Here's a case in point that inspired this post: food for an animal-friendly population will become more widely available as demand increases, so keep going vegan and making sure your needs are known. The market will follow (excerpt):
Some businesses say soon it will be impossible for almost all restaurants not to offer something meatless.I particularly like this one quote, "Otherwise, you'll probably fail." I look forward to the day where restaurants carry numerous, thoughtful veg*n options in order to stay in business. This can happen if we stay active in society and make our wants and needs known. If we hide out and keep to ourselves, it's kind of hard to pressure the market into providing what we need. Transform your world!
"In Austin, it's very important to have vegetarian items. They're such a huge part of the population. Otherwise, you'll probably fail. Unless, of course, you're a barbecue place," Kerbey Lane employee Joshua Kaplan said.
Kerbey Lane, answering to customer demand, has redone their menu. You can now find exactly which items are vegetarian, and there's no shortage.
"Hummus and tabouli. Our avocado tacos, veggie tacos and veggie lasagna. There's a new bruschetta and garlic break," Kaplan said.
You can even cap off your meal with tofu cheesecake so whether it's chili you love or pepperoni, you can find it meatless.
Tails of Marin: Humane farming better for all
Posted by Eric @ 2:35 PM
Marin Independent Journal | Lifestyles: Tails of Marin: Humane farming better for all
This article doesn't include much in the way of revelations, unless you simply haven't had a chance to find out what happens inside factory farms, but it does discuss one of my favorite advocates, Harold Brown, and provides a link to his website (excerpt):
This article doesn't include much in the way of revelations, unless you simply haven't had a chance to find out what happens inside factory farms, but it does discuss one of my favorite advocates, Harold Brown, and provides a link to his website (excerpt):
While most family farmers have been forced by economics to adopt factory farm practices, some farmers, like Harold Brown (aka Farmer Brown) and others in Marin County, are finding ways to make humane farming work.If you haven't seen Peaceable Kingdom yet, please order it now. One of my favorite animal advocacy films ever.
Brown knows first-hand the effects of factory farming on animals and the environment - he was raised on a cattle farm in southern Michigan and spent half of his life in animal agriculture. Haunted by memories of sending animals to slaughter, Brown struggled with his work and the values he had been taught. "In retrospect it was a kind of death of my spirit, the ability to shut off the emotions and feelings I felt for the animals and replace them with a steely resolve to be a man."
Now, having metamorphosed from a beef farmer to a vegan farm animal advocate, Brown works to encourage farmers to adopt cruelty-free and sustainable farming practices - and to "put the family back in farming." He also appears in the acclaimed Tribe of Heart documentary, "Peaceable Kingdom," in which he shares the powerful story of his transformation.
Vets Can Keep Pets If You Can't Pay
Posted by Eric @ 2:31 PM
ThePittsburghChannel.com | Call 4 Action: Vets Can Keep Pets If You Can't Pay
A good reason to consider pet insurance, and to continue pressing to have pets considered some sort of newly-designated adjunct to one's family instead of property (excerpt):
A good reason to consider pet insurance, and to continue pressing to have pets considered some sort of newly-designated adjunct to one's family instead of property (excerpt):
Schorr said, about two weeks ago she started noticing blood throughout the house and realized it was coming from Spaz. The cat also wasn't eating.
She took the cat to East McKeesport Pet Hospital. The bill was more than she could afford, and the vet staff told Schorr they would hold Spaz until she paid the bill.
"Veterinarians have the right to keep the animal because it's considered property in Pennsylvania, and with it being considered property, it's the equivalent of a CD collection or a couch," Molly Gaussa, animal law attorney, said.
According to Gaussa, the vet can only hold the pet for a reasonable period of time. Ask your vet about their policies.
"I was shocked," Schorr said. "I didn't know pets were considered property, and I've never heard of holding a pet."
Thursday, October 13, 2005
Activists plan to sue U.S. to protect polar bears
Posted by Eric @ 2:28 PM
MSNBC.com | Environment: Activists plan to sue U.S. to protect polar bears
Not sure how effective this will be. I'm not big on lawsuits, but sometimes it's the only way to get people or entities to conform to their obligations, I suppose (excerpt):
Not sure how effective this will be. I'm not big on lawsuits, but sometimes it's the only way to get people or entities to conform to their obligations, I suppose (excerpt):
Having not heard back from the Interior Department on their initial request, three environmental groups on Wednesday filed a notice to sue the Bush administration in order to get polar bears listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.
The threat, the groups argued Wednesday and in their first petition last February, is global warming. Many scientists tie manmade emissions of carbon dioxide and other so-called greenhouse gases to warmer global temperatures, and the United States is the largest emitter of C02.
*snip*
“The polar bears’ habitat is melting right out from under them as Arctic temperatures rise,” said Kassie Siegel of the Center for Biological Diversity, one of the three groups. “Their entire lifecycle, from finding food to finding mates, depends on these seas being frozen.”
Animal House
Posted by Eric @ 3:50 AM
Ithaca Times | Front Page: Animal House
More of the same... I'd comment, but I think I've said it all in previous posts. This includes the rapidly diminishing access to these facilities for various authentic and conjured reasons. I'm overdue for a podcast to talk more about such issues, but hours are limited at the moment. My apologies. I will produce a new podcast at my earliest available time slot.
More of the same... I'd comment, but I think I've said it all in previous posts. This includes the rapidly diminishing access to these facilities for various authentic and conjured reasons. I'm overdue for a podcast to talk more about such issues, but hours are limited at the moment. My apologies. I will produce a new podcast at my earliest available time slot.
Wegmans has been bearing the scorn of animal rights protestors in Ithaca, due to the illegal filming of the short documentary Wegmans Cruelty in Wolcott, N.Y., which claimed to expose conditions in Wegmans' laying houses.
Protestors are now gathering weekly at Ithaca's Wegmans. Beeby said she appreciates that Wegmans is selling vegetarian and vegan food, but worries it is more about "tapping into a market" than in treating animals more kindly. Actually, she thinks Wegmans is a "horrible offender of animal rights."
The film shows chickens crammed into battery cages where they can barely move; it also shows some birds trapped in wire, under feeder trays and even in manure pits, where they have no access to food or water.
Those who filmed the documentary broke into Wegmans' laying houses, and, after Wegmans discovered their break-in, the filmakers were arrested and indicted on charges of numerous counts for entering the facility and taking nine hens they believed to be dying (two of which later did die).
Jo Natale, Wegmans' director of Media Relations, said she has seen the documentary.
"Much of the information is inaccurate," she said, adding that in breaking into the laying houses, the protestors posed a biosecurity threat and violated the safety of the hens. "The mortality rate at our farm is less than 8 percent a year. Free range farms usually have a mortality rate of 20 to 40 percent."
When the documentary was released, Wegmans immediately issued a written response. There is a statement on its Web site that reads: "In the end, it was determined there was no evidence of animal abuse. The New York State Police and the Wayne County District Attorney's Office jointly conducted the investigation, and Wegmans fully cooperated."
Beeby does not believe most government institutions fairly assess animal rights, and she sees Wegmans' claim of a bioterrorism threat as a common excuse.
But with current threats such as the avian bird flu now spreading rapidly across Asia, Wegmans keeps increasing its security and limiting the number of people allowed in its laying houses.
Natale and other Wegmans officials state doubts that the entire documentary was even filmed in Wegmans' laying houses. When asked why Wegmans' officials doubt the film's authenticity, Natale simply answered, "Because we know our farms."
Upon further questioning, Natale said she had never personally been inside the laying houses, citing "safety concerns."
Tuesday, October 11, 2005
Feral cats' day to be observed
Posted by Eric @ 2:43 PM
Daily Press | Critter Corner by Frances Goodman: Feral cats' day to be observed
Feral cats are really a human problem, not an animal problem. These animals didn't come out of nowhere. Most of them result from human neglect and abandonment. It is incumbent upon people to spay and neuter their pets, for everyone's sake (excerpt):
Feral cats are really a human problem, not an animal problem. These animals didn't come out of nowhere. Most of them result from human neglect and abandonment. It is incumbent upon people to spay and neuter their pets, for everyone's sake (excerpt):
Sunday, Oct. 16, will mark the Fifth Annual National Feral Cat Day (NFCD), proclaimed by Alley Cat Allies, a national animal welfare agency.
A major goal of NFCD is to promote the Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) program as a non-lethal, humane, and cost-effective way to curb the problem of feral cat overpopulation.
Farmer eaten by own animals
Posted by Eric @ 2:36 PM
Herald News Daily: Farmer eaten by own animals
Calling this guy a farmer is a perversion of the word. But, then, the word has already been perverted so badly by Big Agriculture, hasn't it?
I'm posting the entire story, published today by the Herald News Daily. I found this on a service, but the Herald News Daily website is so badly designed that I couldn't find the story at the source, nor could I Google its whereabouts.
It is not the same story I only just recently reported, which occurred in Vietnam. Evidently the bears in Asia are fighting back, or we are only just hearing about it. The previous story perhaps raised awareness for this one. Let me know if you see it published elsewhere, and I will add the links to this entry:
Calling this guy a farmer is a perversion of the word. But, then, the word has already been perverted so badly by Big Agriculture, hasn't it?
I'm posting the entire story, published today by the Herald News Daily. I found this on a service, but the Herald News Daily website is so badly designed that I couldn't find the story at the source, nor could I Google its whereabouts.
It is not the same story I only just recently reported, which occurred in Vietnam. Evidently the bears in Asia are fighting back, or we are only just hearing about it. The previous story perhaps raised awareness for this one. Let me know if you see it published elsewhere, and I will add the links to this entry:
BEIJING - A Chinese man who raised bears to tap them for their bile, prized as a traditional medicine in Asia, has been killed and eaten by his animals, Xinhua news agency said on Tuesday.
Six black bears attacked keeper Han Shigen as he was cleaning their pen in the northeastern province of Jilin on Monday, Xinhua said.
"The ill-fated man died on the spot and was eaten up by the ferocious bears," it said, citing a report in the Beijing News.
In practices decried by animal rights groups, bile is extracted through surgically implanted catheters in the bear‘s gall bladders, or by a "free-dripping" technique by which bile drips out through holes opened in the animals‘ abdomens.
More than 200 farms in China keep about 7,000 bears to tap their bile, which traditional Chinese medicine holds can cure fever, liver illness and sore eyes.
Bear farming was far more widespread before the cruelty involved came to light and Beijing introduced regulations to control the industry in 1993.
Animal welfare groups have called on China to completely ban bear farming, arguing that traditional herbal medicines can serve the same purposes as bear bile.
Xinhua said police sent to the scene of Monday‘s killing injected one of the bears with tranquillisers "but failed to tame the mad animal".
Police then threw meat into the bears‘ pen to distract them so they could recover Han‘s remains, it said without elaborating.Copyright © 2005 Williston Herald
Vegan for Life
Posted by Eric @ 4:12 AM
American Chronicle: Vegan for Life
Another current piece by Robert Bass, PhD (excerpt):
From the site:
Another current piece by Robert Bass, PhD (excerpt):
At the heart of being vegan is a kind of compassionate awareness. We share this planet not only with billions of fellow human beings, but also with uncounted billions upon billions of other creatures, with lives, wants, enjoyment and suffering as real as our own. Humans have had and used the power to crowd them out, push them aside, sometimes driving them to extinction, and often, making them into tools for our use, servitors of our desires, food for our tables, clothes for our backs. As vegans, we look, we pay attention, we see the unnecessary suffering imposed on our fellow creatures. We respond in compassion, refusing to pretend that might makes right, refusing to turn away and ignore what we know. The vegan message is ultimately very simple:
Look. Pay attention. See the unnecessary death and suffering. We don’t have to contribute or help to keep it going. We can stop being a part of this. And so, that’s what we try to do.
From the site:
Robert Bass, Ph.D, teaches in the Department of Philosophy at the University of North Florida. He specializes in ethics and game theory, and is especially interested in the moral questions relating to the environment and our treatment of animals.
A Modest Proposal
Posted by Eric @ 3:18 AM
The American Daily: A Modest Proposal
Robert Bass has a guest editorial on Covance in the conservative American Daily. You might remember Covance covered here when an undercover investigation by PETA revealed Covance's cruelty toward their experimental animals. I was a bit surprised to see this at such a conservative site, but I'm loving what appears to be growing bipartisan support for a more animal-friendly society (excerpt):
Robert Bass has a guest editorial on Covance in the conservative American Daily. You might remember Covance covered here when an undercover investigation by PETA revealed Covance's cruelty toward their experimental animals. I was a bit surprised to see this at such a conservative site, but I'm loving what appears to be growing bipartisan support for a more animal-friendly society (excerpt):
All I ask is one thing: Transparency. Show the world what Covance is doing. When teenagers can have web-cams in their bedrooms with constant, real-time, feeds to the internet, it surely would not be difficult to arrange something comparable in all the facilities where Covance houses and tests animals. Let the world see that the company is indeed complying with their legal and moral obligations, and treating the animals with respect and compassion.
Or does Covance have something to hide?
Monday, October 10, 2005
the unforbidden fruit
Posted by Eric @ 3:42 AM
The Plain Dealer: the unforbidden fruit
Faith-based eating (excerpt):
Faith-based eating (excerpt):
For the Cleveland-based international Christian Vegetarian Association, one place to start is in the beginning, in the first chapter of Genesis. There God is said to speak of an ideal world where grains and fruits are plentiful, and humans are to care for -- rather than eat -- animals.For more on this last thought, read Dominion, by Matthew Scully.
Fast forward to today, in an era of factory farming that can cause great suffering for animals slaughtered and housed en masse. Some can make a strong case that Jesus would leave meat out of his diet, Christian vegetarians say.
'Christian love should apply to animals as well as humans,' said Dr. Stephen Kaufman, a Northeast Ohio ophthalmologist who is co-chairman of the Christian Vegetarian Association. 'Whatever dominion means, it's not tyranny. It's not cruelty.'
Sunday, October 09, 2005
Editor faces tofu fur fury
Posted by Eric @ 3:28 PM
The Australian: Editor faces tofu fur fury
Further testament that PETA knows how to make the news. All it cost was a tofu cream pie and a press release. Still, isn't this sort of thing kind of juvenile? I guess it's less offensive, and permanent, than red paint. But, maaaan. It's this sort of thing that makes people look at me like I'm a nut when I say I'm vegan.Maybe if someone had run a review of the tofu cream pie and said how delicious it was, activists might have "won" something... (excerpted)
Further testament that PETA knows how to make the news. All it cost was a tofu cream pie and a press release. Still, isn't this sort of thing kind of juvenile? I guess it's less offensive, and permanent, than red paint. But, maaaan. It's this sort of thing that makes people look at me like I'm a nut when I say I'm vegan.
Wintour, dressed in a fur-trimmed black jacket, was hit in the face with a tofu cream pie as she left the Chloe ready-to-wear show in central Paris, members of the group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals said.
It was the second such attack this year on Wintour, a fur supporter decried by animal rights groups as a "pelt pusher".
"Wintour is fur-bearing animals' worst enemy because her magazine continues to feature dozens of pags of pro-fur editorials and advertising each year," PETA campaigner Yvonne Taylor said. "She takes big glossy advertisements for fur and she refuses to run any anti-fur ads, even paid ones, so she's a big fur supporter."
More on the False Dilemma...
Posted by Eric @ 3:23 PM
Fredericksburg.com | The Free Lance-Star: PETA gets humanitarian results that other groups don't
AAFL quote award of the week:
AAFL quote award of the week:
Ms. Saunders also seems to imply that one can care for animals or care for humans. She does not seem to grasp that one can care for both.See the quote in the banner, above, for why I'm pleased to come across this letter to the editor.
Saturday, October 08, 2005
Bear attack in Vietnam leaves one person dead, another injured
Posted by Eric @ 4:30 AM
The China Post: Bear attack in Vietnam leaves one person dead, another injured
I do hate to see the violent loss of any life, but if I were to feel sympathetic toward anyone here, it would be the bear caged for 20 years with a nasty little tube grafted into it so its bile can be stolen for this man's profit. What does one except from a caged and tortured bear? (except):
I do hate to see the violent loss of any life, but if I were to feel sympathetic toward anyone here, it would be the bear caged for 20 years with a nasty little tube grafted into it so its bile can be stolen for this man's profit. What does one except from a caged and tortured bear? (except):
A bear that had been caged for 20 years killed its owner and injured his servant in southern Vietnam's Ho Chi Minh city, police said Saturday.They kill both the bears this guy exploited because they acted in their own natural interests? That is pretty hard to stomach, much like the whole bile-extraction practice. For more on this issue, please visit AnimalsAsia Foundation
Tran Hoang Loc, 75, was killed instantly when the bear -- one of two he kept to extract and sell their bile -- attacked him on Friday, said a police officer who identified himself only as Truong. Bear bile is used as traditional medicine in parts of Asia.
Loc's servant was injured when he tried to rescue his employer, Truong said.
The female bear lashed out at Loc and threw him to the ground when he opened the cage to feed the animals, Truong said, adding that soldiers had been sent in to shoot both bears.
Loc had raised the bears for 20 years for their bile, which is used in traditional medicine in Vietnam and China and said to cure many ailments. Bear bile farms are illegal in Vietnam, but the government rarely cracks down on them.
An estimated 2,300 to 2,400 bears are held captive for bile in Vietnam.
Scientists offered animal research haven in Africa
Posted by Eric @ 3:54 AM
Scotsman.com | News | International: Scientists offered animal research haven in Africa
Further support for my theory that militant tactics against animal testing has negative long-term consequences (excerpt):
Further support for my theory that militant tactics against animal testing has negative long-term consequences (excerpt):
...the Institute of Primate Research in Nairobi is opening its doors to an expected research exodus. The move angered animal welfare groups, which warn that western scientists must not be allowed to escape the ethical standards of their countries.
Thursday, October 06, 2005
Duck farm flap
Posted by Eric @ 3:26 PM
FortWayne.com: Duck farm flap
Ooooh, where to start?
Excerpt:
I mean, do I need to say anything? This guy is so convinced that what he's doing is reasonable that he pretty much doesn't realize how awful this sounds to compassionate ears. I don't see him swaying the public over the next seven years, do you?
Ooooh, where to start?
Excerpt:
In one of these barns, about 2,000 4-day-old bright yellow ducklings are gathered along the far, long wall. The room is warm, the air thick and musky. One dead duckling lies near one of the several water stations. Another onestands apart from the group cheep-cheep-cheeping.
"He's probably blind," Delmas says. "He'll have to be euthanized."
Animal-rights activists who have sued, videotaped and lobbied against Sonoma Foie Gras cite dying ducks as evidence of cruelty, but Gonzalez contends that such deaths are typical of farm life and that Sonoma's mortality rate is less than your average poultry farm.
An adjacent barn holds about 4,000 18-day-old ducks that eat and drink at stations set up around the cavernous space. The air feels dense, buzzing with flies and scented with gaminess and the floor-covering wood shavings.
At this point each duck weighs about 1.65 pounds, Gonzalez says. You can tell the ones that have just eaten by the bulges in their necks.
"They just eat, sleep," Delmas says.
"Play," Gonzalez adds.
Still yellow and fuzzy, these ducks tend to sit and move en masse, like an avian variation on the computer-generated armies of movie epics. After five or six weeks during which they develop their feathers, the ducks are moved outside to roam until they're 12 weeks old. Then comes the force-feeding period known as gavage.
The final two to three weeks of their take place in two adjacent, long barns that are darker and danker than the others. The air is suffused with the pungent aroma of feathers and droppings. Single, hanging, exposed 40-watt bulbs offer dim light. At the barn's far end, large fans blow cool air through the building.
The pens are lined up in four rows, their slatted floors raised about 3 feet from the ground to let the manure fall through. The ducks have some room to maneuver, though they tend to cluster when anyone walks by.
Near the barn's entrance sits a large wheelbarrow filled with corn kernels, which are cleaned, cooked and mixed with corn oil to make the ducks' feed. These ducks are being raised to make Artisan Foie Gras, the business' premium line. The ducks in the second barn produce the standard Sonoma Foie Gras line, and their diet is a combination of ground and whole corn plus water and minerals.
The Sonoma ducks' food is harder to digest but cheaper to make, and the feedings are quicker: 1-2 seconds apiece compared with 5-8 seconds for the Artisan ducks. Hence the Sonoma Foie Gras is less expensive: $26-$31 per pound wholesale vs. $31-$34 per pound for the Artisan.
The two barns' feeding machines differ slightly as well, but the basic principle is the same: sticking a copper tube down a duck's esophagus and filling it to the brim with corn. The feedings take place twice a day, with three workers in each barn taking charge of the gavage.
On this late morning, Vargas is still working his way through the Artisan ducks. He steps from one pen into another and sits on his crate, the copper tube suspended like an oversize dentist's drill. The ducks huddle in a corner.
"They know what's going to happen, and they don't like to be grabbed," Delmas says.
Vargas takes the first one by the neck, points the beak straight up in the air and drops the copper tube down, down, down the duck's throat. The machine, driven by hydraulic pressure, whizzes and spits 400 to 450 grams of feed into the duck's esophagus.
Vargas hoists the copper tube and places the duck to his left, his body separating it from those still to be fed. This duck flaps its wings and looks around.
"You can feel the corn," Delmas says, placing his fingers at the base of the duck's bulging throat. "He is full here" -- he moves his fingers up to the chin -- "to here."
These ducks are about nine days into the gavage. Deeper into the barn reside ducks just a day or two from processing. A few have grown so unsteady that they fall over as they try to walk.
"He is weak, and he is going to go into processing tomorrow," Delmas says of one.
Some also are breathing heavily.
"They are panting," Delmas says. "They're like dogs."
"The panting is a thermal regulation mechanism," Gonzalez says. "They are so fat, so they are hot."
The ducks are processed -- i.e., slaughtered -- when they have reached their maximum weight, usually about 15 pounds. Gonzalez did himself some public-relations damage two years ago when a local TV interviewer asked him what would happen to the ducks if the force-feeding continued indefinitely.
He replied, "Obviously they will die."
Gonzalez complains that his comment was intercut with an animal-rights group's "horror" footage of distressed foie gras ducks. Still, the farmers do have to stop filling those esophagi. "At one time they are going to stop digesting," Delmas says, "so there is no point."
By the time the ducks are killed, their livers have ballooned to an average of 1 1/2 pounds -- or, Gonzalez says, between eight and 10 times their normal size. Last year Sonoma Foie Gras processed 80,000 ducks, and despite the controversy Gonzalez expects this year's total to rise to 90,000 thanks to the dish's increased popularity.
So after all of this, do the ducks suffer, and if so, how much?
They're not saying.
"The birds can't talk," says Elliot Katz, founder of the Mill Valley, Calif.-based In Defense of Animals. "All they can do is waddle and suffer. They don't scream like other animals."
Advocates on either side cite numerous studies, polls and bans (or rescinded bans) that support their positions. There's little clarity in the middle either. This summer the American Veterinary Medical Association rebuffed animal-rights activists' push for a condemnation of such force-feeding, announcing that its review of "science and current production practices" led the group to conclude that "it is not necessary . . . to take a position either for or against foie gras production at this time."
Even Tirath Sandhu, laboratory director for Cornell University's non-political Duck Research Laboratory, can't be definitive. "I don't know whether they are suffering or not," Sandhu says, noting that a French study shows that foie gras ducks don't demonstrate certain hormone-level increases normally associated with stress. But, he adds, "I would be stressed."
Gonzalez doesn't deny that his ducks experience stress -- it's just a matter of degree.
"When they are fat, when they are heavy, obviously the animal is not moving around like if it would be in the orchard when it weighs five less pounds," he says. "No, we are aware that we are demanding an effort from the animal. But that is not exclusive to us doing foie gras, and we are demanding of the animal only in the last three or four days of that two-week period."
Gonzalez has less than seven years to sway the public -- or at least the California legislature -- to his perspective
I mean, do I need to say anything? This guy is so convinced that what he's doing is reasonable that he pretty much doesn't realize how awful this sounds to compassionate ears. I don't see him swaying the public over the next seven years, do you?
Lawsuit targets dairy industry
Posted by Eric @ 3:24 PM
The Washington Times | Business: Lawsuit targets dairy industry
Now here's an interesting approach to affecting the dairy industry. This won't bring it down, and I don't want lawsuits about minor side effects to bring it down anyway (what comes around goes around, after all), but it seems fair to me that consumers should be more informed about this beverage that is thrust on them from childhood, and should be consumed by no human. After all, milk from a cow is meant to raise calves, and they get awfully big from this stuff. Cow's milk has been linked quite convincingly to prostate cancer and other health problems, so it seems reasonable to me that a warning label is necessary (excerpt):
Now here's an interesting approach to affecting the dairy industry. This won't bring it down, and I don't want lawsuits about minor side effects to bring it down anyway (what comes around goes around, after all), but it seems fair to me that consumers should be more informed about this beverage that is thrust on them from childhood, and should be consumed by no human. After all, milk from a cow is meant to raise calves, and they get awfully big from this stuff. Cow's milk has been linked quite convincingly to prostate cancer and other health problems, so it seems reasonable to me that a warning label is necessary (excerpt):
Plaintiffs said in an advance copy of the suit they unwittingly suffered lactose intolerance for an unspecified time period by buying and drinking milk from several local stores.That said, I can see a ruling on this case being viewed as "activist judging," when perhaps the more above-board approach would be to get a labeling measure enacted through the legislature. However, seeing as how many of those fat cats are unlikely to upset the industry, I can see why this route was chosen. Curious to see how this turns out. Great way to get the lactose intolerance issue into a conservative publication, too!
*snip*
Lactose intolerance, which affects about 25 percent of the U.S. adult population, is the inability to digest significant amounts of lactose, the main sugar in milk, according to the National Institutes of Health.
Common symptoms include nausea, cramps, bloating, gas and diarrhea, which begin about 30 minutes to two hours after eating or drinking foods containing lactose, NIH said.
Charge under animal research law
Posted by Eric @ 3:17 PM
BBC NEWS | UK | England | Cambridgeshire: Charge under animal research law
And the animal research law bares its teeth... (excerpt)
And the animal research law bares its teeth... (excerpt)
Mark Taylor, 38, from Wakefield, West Yorks, is accused of interference with contractual relationships so as to harm an animal research organisation.
This comes under the Serious and Organised Crime and Police Act 2005.
Animal advocates pushing 28-hour Rule for livestock truckers
Posted by Eric @ 3:13 PM
Today's Trucking: The Online Business Resource for Canada's Trucking Industry: Animal advocates pushing 28-hour Rule for livestock truckers
Here we have a vivid desciption from HSUS's Wayne Pacelle about the treatment of animals during transport, which has surely got to be one of the more unpleasant passages of an animal's brief, miserable life:
Here we have a vivid desciption from HSUS's Wayne Pacelle about the treatment of animals during transport, which has surely got to be one of the more unpleasant passages of an animal's brief, miserable life:
Transporting farm animals for 28 or more hours without rest, food, or water is clearly inhumane, and the USDA's failure to place any time limit whatsoever on truck transport is indefensible. If the USDA doesn't understand the definition of 'truck,' we would be happy to send over a dictionary."
The group claims that each year, millions of animals are denied rest and food, and are injured on longhaul trucking routes. In a report, the group cites instances of "customary cruelties" on animals transported by truck, including:
Dead animals left onboard trucks for more than 30 hours among live animals; animals enduring temperatures exceeding 90 degree temperatures; animals denied food, drinking water and a chance to rest; and animals suffering numerous injuries, including, bruises and abrasions on their bodies.
Tuna tagged in bid to study overfishing
Posted by Eric @ 2:47 PM
MSNBC.com | Environment: Tuna tagged in bid to study overfishing
This article is more concerned with people running out of fish to eat than the impact of overfishing on the environment, but there it is (excerpt):
This article is more concerned with people running out of fish to eat than the impact of overfishing on the environment, but there it is (excerpt):
“Over one million tons of tuna are caught and sold annually compared to only 50,000 tons 50 years ago,” she said.
That has fuelled fears among development experts and marine scientists that tuna — and other fish stocks — may disappear altogether.
Southern Calif. ban on sea otters might end
Posted by Eric @ 2:45 PM
MSNBC.com | Environment: Southern Calif. ban on sea otters might end
FYI...
FYI...
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on Wednesday proposed allowing sea otters back into Southern California waters, saying that scrapping the current “no-otter zone” would boost recovery efforts for the threatened species.
The agency also recommended ending an 18-year-old program that sent more than 100 sea otters from the Central Coast to San Nicolas Island, one of the Channel Islands off the Southern California coast, in an unsuccessful attempt to establish a new population.
FDA may approve cloned food
Posted by Eric @ 2:44 PM
MSNBC.com: FDA may approve cloned food
Forget what the people say. There's profits to be made!
Forget what the people say. There's profits to be made!
Asked earlier this year in a poll by the International Food Information Council whether they'd willingly buy meat, milk and eggs that come from clones if the FDA declared them to be safe, 63 percent of consumers said no.
PETA: Whatever It Takes
Posted by Eric @ 2:41 PM
AlterNet: PETA: Whatever It Takes
Interesting piece on PETA for AlterNet (excerpts):
Interesting piece on PETA for AlterNet (excerpts):
PETA is just a vehicle for the animal rights movement, and the staff is fully aware of this, so there's no such thing as bad press, and there's absolute indifference to folks who don't like the group's tactics. Anything at all that gets PETA in the headlines is a win for the animals.I think it is widely acknowledged, at least by many veg*ns in the movement who are familiar with PETA's tactics, that this is their M.O. I have to say I don't believe 100% in the bad press principle, but it does certainly have its moments, and this article mentions a couple of reasons why:
the truth is, this animal rights thing is a tarpit. The more people are exposed to it, the less comfortable they are with the concept of animal suffering. That's the premise, anyway, and I think it's true.
My first interviewee was Colleen O' Brien, PETA's communications manager.There's a lot of feedback after the article, predictably, and it seems to cover many POVs. I didn't have time to read all of it before getting this entry out, but you may want to look at them, perhaps post your own. What do you think of PETA?
As bluntly as possible, I asked her about PETA's sending vegetarian chefs to Camp Casey in Crawford, Texas during Bush's August vacation: Do you feel like you made a good return on that investment? After all, PETA is not Morgan Stanley; while it's a $25 million a year operation, it still has to pick its battles.
O' Brien started by spinning me, saying, "Vegetarianism is a cruel-free way of living." She said PETA went into Camp Casey with a non-partisan agenda -- "Those folks were out there, hungry" -- and gave them a vegetarian alternative to eating "decomposing corpses." After I let her go on with this for a while (and yes, putting her quotes in this article is a successful advancement of the animal rights agenda), I tried to bring her back to the issue of whether PETA had mercilessly seized on the fact that hundreds of bored reporters were in Camp Casey, looking to add color to their stories about a poor mother who lost her son in an awful war.
Then she said what I was looking for: "What sets PETA apart from a lot of other groups, is that we have a special relationship with the media. We don't have budgets for the placement of ads like, I suppose, some other groups. We have to do stunts to reach the greatest number of people."
So was the Casey stunt a success? "We had some write-ups," O' Brien said.
Wednesday, October 05, 2005
Debate offers food for thought
Posted by Eric @ 3:03 PM
Times Union: Debate offers food for thought
I read/hear a lot of complaints from vegetarians and vegans about Whole Foods Markets, a rapidly growing chain run by a vegan, selling meat. As one can imagine the market pressures being what they are, a major natural foods grocery store without meat would never be able to grow and bring to the masses the level of quality, whole foods, not to mention the variety of animal-friendly products I've never seen anywhere else. If the majority of Americans stop eating meat, stores won't have to worry so much about stocking it. This is not just a corporate problem (excerpt):
I read/hear a lot of complaints from vegetarians and vegans about Whole Foods Markets, a rapidly growing chain run by a vegan, selling meat. As one can imagine the market pressures being what they are, a major natural foods grocery store without meat would never be able to grow and bring to the masses the level of quality, whole foods, not to mention the variety of animal-friendly products I've never seen anywhere else. If the majority of Americans stop eating meat, stores won't have to worry so much about stocking it. This is not just a corporate problem (excerpt):
Honest Weight Food Co-op is mulling a plan to beef up meat and fish sales. Members will vote on the change later this month.
But last week, some vegetarians stationed themselves outside the Central Avenue store to express opposition and educate shoppers about animal cruelty.
"It is a values issue," said member Cia Bruno. "Organic meat does not translate into humane treatment of animals." She gave out pamphlets, then collected dozens of opposing signatures.
Interrupting an interview, she described a sheep castration to a shopper. Animals feel pain and are routinely mistreated, she said.
"We don't really want to have a corpse market," added Jo Blaine of Albany.
Few local merchants are as careful about what they sell as Honest Weight. Tobacco and alcohol are banned, as are artificial preservatives, food coloring and high fructose corn syrup. The grocery store manual emphasizes respect "for humanity and the earth."
Members, who stock shelves and run registers, also emphatically debate stock choices such as coffee. A store controversy over refined sugar yawned on for months before the sweetener was authorized in 2000.
Back in 1976, 50 like-minded individuals created a buying club that grew into a Quail Street store and moved, in 1995, to 484 Central Ave. with 3,000 members.
"It is a values-oriented business," board president Lynne Lekakis said. "At the co-op, we always talk about values." The goal? Consensus.
But agreement on meat, poultry and fish has proved elusive. Although many co-ops across America now carry meat and fish, two years of talks in Albany failed to reach an agreement.
This week, the board will issue a referendum by mail for working members. Results are expected later this month.
The controversy reveals a related fear that the rise in nonmember (often suburban) shoppers could detach the co-op from its core constituency. Nonmembers account for up to 60 percent of its $4 million annual sales.
Said Bruno: "Are we going to stick to our fundamental values? Or work on demand of the client."
Managers say they need to cultivate new members to stay in business.
Which brings them to: eating meat.
While many longtime customers don't want to shop in the presence of slaughtered animals, many more say they want to buy meat, Lekakis said.
And they don't want to travel to a second store to get it. Why not sell organic meats and eco-friendly fish at Honest Weight?
Podcast: Undercover Investigations Stir Up Controversy, Media Coverage
Posted by Eric @ 2:50 PM
If I sound a little dead in this podcast, it's because I'm pretty exhausted from my work schedule right now, and because I spend a good deal of my day talking on the phone. Hopefully it doesn't make you fall asleep, as you'd miss a most interesting subject, factory farm investigations. Here are some stories mentioned in the podcast (along with the egg stories below):
SF Bay Area Indymedia: Murder Most Fowl (w/pic)
TheWGALChannel.com: Animal Rights Group Sneaks Onto Chicken Farms, Makes Video (w/slideshow & video)
voice of san diego: Activists' Homes Raided by FBI
AAC Podcast
Also, don't forget to record A Current Affair tonight (see blog entry here).
SF Bay Area Indymedia: Murder Most Fowl (w/pic)
TheWGALChannel.com: Animal Rights Group Sneaks Onto Chicken Farms, Makes Video (w/slideshow & video)
voice of san diego: Activists' Homes Raided by FBI
AAC Podcast
Also, don't forget to record A Current Affair tonight (see blog entry here).
N.J. fur buyers get a gift: Sales tax gone
Posted by Eric @ 2:45 PM
NorthJersey.com: N.J. fur buyers get a gift: Sales tax gone
If state tax should be removed from any products, they should be essentials that may be out of reach of ordinary people. This is yet another government gift to the wealthy, considering it is for a completely unnecessary "luxury" item that stems from such cruelty. As successful as the campaign against foie gras has been, certainly a fur campaign in the same mold could make a dent against the practice of skinning animals for fashion.
Excerpt:
All about the money, of course. Forget the miserable lives and deaths the animals experience... Money's at stake, for God's sake! This goes a long way toward explaining the mindset:
If state tax should be removed from any products, they should be essentials that may be out of reach of ordinary people. This is yet another government gift to the wealthy, considering it is for a completely unnecessary "luxury" item that stems from such cruelty. As successful as the campaign against foie gras has been, certainly a fur campaign in the same mold could make a dent against the practice of skinning animals for fashion.
Excerpt:
Despite efforts by animal rights groups who oppose its sale, revenues are up. The Fur Information Council of America reported that sales of fur, and fur-trimmed apparel and accessories, tallied $1.81 billion in 2004, an increase of 1.1 percent from the prior year.
Lucas expects the removal of the sales tax to help increase revenues. With the state sales tax at 6 percent, after all, someone now purchasing a $5,000 mink coat won't have to pay an additional $300 in sales tax.
"It's a lot of money,'' said Lucas, whose furs sell from about $1,000 to about $30,000.
All about the money, of course. Forget the miserable lives and deaths the animals experience... Money's at stake, for God's sake! This goes a long way toward explaining the mindset:
"...people don't feel it's as politically incorrect to buy fur since a lot of designers are showing it on the runways. It gave people a green light to buy fur again.''This explains why protestors still jump on stage and make a scene at fashion shows, but I think the fur buyers out there end up thinking animal activists are nuts and buy the fur anyway, or in spite of what they see. I'd like to know how much activism is focused on the media, the designers themselves, and in front of stores. And, no, I'm not talking about red paint. Those faunavision vans are amazing for outreach.
US Broadens Mad Cow Rule to All Animal Feed
Posted by Eric @ 3:47 AM
Planet Ark: US Broadens Mad-Cow Rule to All Animal Feed
Somehow I can't see the consumer groups actually jeering. That's an effective way to cast them in a negative light, though, isn't it? Sheesh.
Excerpt:
Somehow I can't see the consumer groups actually jeering. That's an effective way to cast them in a negative light, though, isn't it? Sheesh.
Excerpt:
The US government on Tuesday said it would tighten its safeguards against the spread of mad cow disease by banning cattle brains and spinal cords from all animal feed instead of just from cattle feed.
Food and Drug Administration officials said the proposed rule would greatly reduce the risk of disease. Consumer groups jeered and found "loopholes big enough to drive a cow through."
The so-called feed rule, first imposed in 1997, already banned the use of cattle parts in making cattle feed. After the first US case of mad cow disease was discovered in December 2003, the FDA began work on revisions. It will accept comments for 75 days and issue a final rule in 2006.
In general, FDA would ban the use in animal feed of brains and spinal cords from older cattle and from uninspected cattle destined for food use.
As a result, FDA said, there was no need for other steps such as barring the use of cattle blood and blood products as feed supplements, the use of restaurant scraps and poultry litter, or requiring feed makers to restrict equipment, or even entire mills, to making feed for specific species.
"This is 90 percent of any infectivity that may be present in an animal," said Steven Sundlof, director of FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine, in explaining why FDA decided to ban use of brains and spinal cords.
Consumer groups said FDA proposed incomplete safeguards. Consumers Union and the Center for Science in the Public Interest said FDA failed to exclude cattle parts, such as nervous tissue, eyeballs and tonsils, that are banned from the food supply because they can carry mad cow disease.
Consumers Union said it would press for "a complete ban on feeding animals to food animals." A ban that was 90 percent effective "is absolutely not enough," said CU's Jean Halloran.
LCA and Best Friends on A Current Affair Wednesday night
Posted by Eric @ 3:32 AM
From Last Chance for Animals:
Tomorrow, Wednesday, October 5th, Last Chance for Animals and Best Friends will be showcased on the hit television news program A Current Affair.
Last week, the LCA rescue team joined the Best Friends team in Louisiana to aid in the rescue of lost and abandoned animals in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina.
This special broadcast will feature exclusive video from the rescue and an interview with LCA president and founder, Chris DeRose.
A Current Affair airs airs on Fox 11 at 11pm in Los Angeles and on Fox 5 at 6:30pm in New York.
Please visit A Current Affair's website to find the specific showtimes for your area!
Tuesday, October 04, 2005
Egg Label Changed After Md. Group Complains
Posted by Eric @ 3:12 PM
The COK press release I posted in the wee hours last night made it to many of the major papers today. Here's a brief sampling:
Washington Post: Egg Label Changed After Md. Group Complains
The New York Times: Egg Producers Relent on Industry Seal
Another one includes a sidebar on "egg terminology" - The Des Moines Register: Egg producers group agrees to alter logo, settling complaint
Washington Post: Egg Label Changed After Md. Group Complains
In interviews yesterday, both sides claimed success.
"The program is intact, which for us is a great victory," said Mitch Head, spokesman for United Egg Producers. "The only thing that was in question was the words on the logo itself. That's why we decided, 'Let's change the words, because we don't want a cloud hanging over this.' "
Erica Meier, director of Compassion Over Killing, said the decision was a win for animals and consumers.
"Consumers will be able to make more informed buying choices and won't be duped or deceived into buying eggs that were produced by animal cruelty," she said. "They will more than likely opt for eggs labeled as cage-free or free-range."
Head responded: "We support cage-free eggs as a choice for consumers. We say, let consumers make their own choice. They are making their choice right now, and 98 percent of them are choosing conventional eggs," which are significantly cheaper than free-range eggs.
The New York Times: Egg Producers Relent on Industry Seal
United Egg Producers has consistently disputed that hens are mistreated. Mr. Head said a national consumer survey done by the producers showed that consumers did not think the label was misleading.
The issue of the Animal Care Certified labeling began in 2002, when the United Egg Producers established a panel of independent scientists to study the conditions under which egg-laying hens were raised. The scientists looked at cage space, food, water and how the hens were transported, among other factors.
The panel, headed by Jeffrey Armstrong, dean of agriculture and natural resources at Michigan State University, came up that year with a set of guidelines. Producers who followed the guidelines could place the Animal Care Certified seal on their egg cartons. Producers submit monthly compliance reports and are audited annually, usually by staff members of the United States Agriculture Department.
Mr. Head said the animal welfare groups' battle against egg producers could cost consumers money. The groups are pushing for eggs to be produced in a cage-free or free-roaming environment. Eggs produced under those conditions cost about $3 a dozen, about three times what eggs produced by conventionally caged chickens cost. Some 98 percent of the eggs that are sold in the United States are cage-produced, Mr. Head said.
Another one includes a sidebar on "egg terminology" - The Des Moines Register: Egg producers group agrees to alter logo, settling complaint
The Better Business Bureau agreed with animal-welfare activists that the "Animal Care Certified" seal would mislead shoppers into thinking the farming standards were higher than they were. Public concern about the treatment of livestock has been a nagging issue for farmers, especially in Iowa, the nation's largest producer of pork and eggs.
Eggs, eggs, eggs...
Posted by Eric @ 6:34 AM
Yahoo! | Financial News: FTC Announces End to Misleading Egg Logo
This victory announced by Compassion Over Killing Monday highlights the war going on between advocacy groups and corporations, with a little assist by the government. By that I mean the government occasionally assists either side, depending on the area of our government, and when it's expedient...
Excerpt:
The industry would love nothing more than to have these kinds of activists associated with the activists destroying labs and leaving bombs on doorsteps, which will only increase the difficulty for activists making social progress for the animals. Imagine being unable to get this footage to prevent the corporations from deceiving consumers and hopefully ending the cruelty altogether some day.
Personally, I think research labs and chicken farms should be made with glass walls, but that's not going to happen. If things keep up the way they are, the industries will only become less transparent.
It's clear that even meat and egg eaters want animals treated better, but the industry would rather deceive their customers than tell them what they really do to animals. The truth-seekers should be rewarded, not sent to court. If the industry suffers damages, it's due to their deceit, not the activist break-ins.
That said, here's a rare story where a bystander acquired footage of cruelty toward hens in Missouri (excerpt):
Note how the company spiiiins this: "I guess that depends on the definition of animal abuse." Sounds so evasive that you just have to wonder how much Hudgens learned from watching politicians and other government officials. This has got be the focus of many public discussions. If the average consumer finds this treatment wrong, and the industry tries to weasle out of it, then the consumer certainly not trust the companies, as the logo fiasco has amply demonstrated. If you still eat eggs, please boycott them now.
The above story also covers the environmental impact of big egg operations as well, so that's another good reason to read it:
St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Charges cloud egg factory's expansion plans in Neosho
For more on eggs, visit eggscam.com
This victory announced by Compassion Over Killing Monday highlights the war going on between advocacy groups and corporations, with a little assist by the government. By that I mean the government occasionally assists either side, depending on the area of our government, and when it's expedient...
Excerpt:
The "Animal Care Certified" logo first came under scrutiny in June 2003, when Compassion Over Killing filed petitions with the Better Business Bureau (BBB) and the FTC, as well as other federal agencies, asserting that the logo is misleading. Under the "Animal Care Certified" guidelines, egg producers are permitted to intensively confine hens in "battery cages" so small they can't even spread their wings, among other abuses.This win was made possible in part due to undercover investigations, which have the industry so nervous they are leveraging their government contacts in an attempt to increase penalties for cases like this:
In 2003, and again upon appeal in 2004, the BBB deemed the "Animal Care Certified" logo misleading because it implied a greater level of humane care than is actually the case. Despite these rulings and the BBB's subsequent referral of the matter to FTC for potential legal action against the UEP, the logo continued to appear on cartons across the country-and consumers continued to be deceived.
According to the FTC, by March 31, 2006, the "Animal Care Certified" logo will be gone from grocery store shelves, and consumers can expect to find it replaced with an alternative logo reading "United Egg Producers Certified."
"This victory is important for both animals and consumers," explains COK Executive Director Erica Meier. "While the egg industry's husbandry guidelines still permit routine animal cruelty, at least the new logo will no longer convey a false message of humane animal care. The industry's next step should be to amend its guidelines to prohibit battery cages."
Three animal-rights activists have been indicted and accused of breaking into Wegmans Egg Farm in western New York to film the chickens.Ha. "Well within the law." I think they mean the one that provides zero protections for hens under federal Humane Slaughter Act. After all, those conditions are industry standard...
*snip*
The activists are accused of breaking into the grocery chain's hen facility in June 2004 to film the chickens' living conditions. The footage showed up in a short film called, quote, "Wegmans Cruelty."
*snip*
Wegmans has said conditions at the farm are well within the law.
The industry would love nothing more than to have these kinds of activists associated with the activists destroying labs and leaving bombs on doorsteps, which will only increase the difficulty for activists making social progress for the animals. Imagine being unable to get this footage to prevent the corporations from deceiving consumers and hopefully ending the cruelty altogether some day.
Personally, I think research labs and chicken farms should be made with glass walls, but that's not going to happen. If things keep up the way they are, the industries will only become less transparent.
It's clear that even meat and egg eaters want animals treated better, but the industry would rather deceive their customers than tell them what they really do to animals. The truth-seekers should be rewarded, not sent to court. If the industry suffers damages, it's due to their deceit, not the activist break-ins.
That said, here's a rare story where a bystander acquired footage of cruelty toward hens in Missouri (excerpt):
Bussey saw workers dumping a mix of live and dead chickensPersonally, I think a guy in favor of calf-roping finding the concept of tossing out live chickens with the dead is a liiiittle strange, but at least he's stirred up the locals and got it on video.
into a tractor trailer, and he videotaped them. Three workers and the company
have since been charged with criminal animal abuse.
*snip*
He didn't deny that live chickens were thrown away with dead ones. In the industry, hens that no longer produce eggs are called "spent hens." Moark guidelines call for spent hens to be euthanized in a 55-gallon drum with carbon monoxide. Workers are supposed to watch for chickens that survived the procedure and perform an approved "cervical dislocation." The job fell to a three-man crew hired by Moark, Hudgens said.
"On that particular evening, they just weren't being patient," he said.
Hudgens said the incident and resulting charges have been difficult for him. He said he's always been dedicated to doing things the right way. "Was there a failure that night? Absolutely," he said. "Was there animal abuse? I guess that depends on the definition of animal abuse."
Note how the company spiiiins this: "I guess that depends on the definition of animal abuse." Sounds so evasive that you just have to wonder how much Hudgens learned from watching politicians and other government officials. This has got be the focus of many public discussions. If the average consumer finds this treatment wrong, and the industry tries to weasle out of it, then the consumer certainly not trust the companies, as the logo fiasco has amply demonstrated. If you still eat eggs, please boycott them now.
The above story also covers the environmental impact of big egg operations as well, so that's another good reason to read it:
St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Charges cloud egg factory's expansion plans in Neosho
For more on eggs, visit eggscam.com
Phoenix to Walk the Line in plastic boots
Posted by Eric @ 5:44 AM
MSNBC.com | Gossip | The Scoop: Phoenix to Walk the Line in plastic boots:
In quick, slightly "fluffier" news (found in gossip, after all), but no less serious, in a sense:
Categories: joaquin phoenix | johnny cash | peta | boots | leather-free | movies | walk the line
In quick, slightly "fluffier" news (found in gossip, after all), but no less serious, in a sense:
When Joaquin Phoenix walks the line in a Johnny Cash biopic, it will be in plastic cowboy boots.Joaquin is one of my favorite animal protection supporters, and this is one reason why. Awww, poor wardrobe people. For what it's worth, I've been reading amazing things about his performance in the film as Johnny Cash. Watch it and notice how great he looks in animal-free clothes while you're at it!
The moody actor is a staunch animal-rights supporter, and drove the wardrobe folks a little batty by insisting on wearing an entirely “cruelty-free” wardrobe, says a source.
“He refused to wear anything made of leather,” says a source. “So even Johnny Cash’s signature cowboy boots had to be approved by PETA.”
Categories: joaquin phoenix | johnny cash | peta | boots | leather-free | movies | walk the line
Stock listing down a rat hole
Posted by Eric @ 5:24 AM
Between some Blogger issues, my schedule, and having to completely reinstall OSX (are we seeing Apple rip off Microsoft's tendency for crash-happiness?), I have had some delays getting to the blog, much less podcasting. Hopefully I'll get back on a better schedule in the next 24 hours or so, so bear with.
I am going to post a handful of entries now, so read on... (always feels weird writing this when the newest posts show above, but hopefully some of you scroll down, then read up!)
The Washington Times: Stock listing down a rat hole
Yeow. Nice start.
The Washington Times has a bilious commentary that, like too many commentaries, paints the AR movement with a broad and negative brush. Unfortunately, this is what happens when a loud and dangerous minority paints the scientific community with an even larger brush.
You threaten and endanger people, paint them in a corner, they have little recourse but to attack. This is only going to get worse (excerpt):
I am going to post a handful of entries now, so read on... (always feels weird writing this when the newest posts show above, but hopefully some of you scroll down, then read up!)
The Washington Times: Stock listing down a rat hole
Yeow. Nice start.
The Washington Times has a bilious commentary that, like too many commentaries, paints the AR movement with a broad and negative brush. Unfortunately, this is what happens when a loud and dangerous minority paints the scientific community with an even larger brush.
You threaten and endanger people, paint them in a corner, they have little recourse but to attack. This is only going to get worse (excerpt):
the animal-rights movement is so hate-filled that anonymous activists also harass civilians who are only loosely associated with the research. They don't just go after Wall Street execs, they also pick on paralegals. They don't just harass workers, they also harass their families. Like other terrorists, they apparently figure anyone who is not with them is guilty, and hence deserves punishment.Please stop the hate. Stop the violence. Look at the big picture. For the animals.
Sunday, October 02, 2005
World Farm Animals Day
Posted by Eric @ 3:24 PM

Today's the day. Hopefully you can take part in activities in your community, if you haven't already. I realize I'm late in posting this out on the West Coast, though I did mention it a while back. Things have been hectic over the past week with the disaster assistance gig I started. I had intended to cover this event more fully. If you have stories to relate from today, please e-mail them to me, and I will see about including them with tomorrow's posts.
More militant hypocrisy
Posted by Eric @ 2:55 PM
Independent Online Edition | Crime | Animal rights extremists force firms to cut all links with lab
I do want to preface this blog post by saying that the word "force" in the Independent article's title is a misuse of the word, though I suppose close enough, considering. Militants have no way of "forcing" them to stop, like an enforced law could. "Intimidate firms in to cutting all links" would be a more accurate phrase. I just like to point these types of things out when I notice them, so that we can all continue to read the media bias critically. That said, it's actions like these that lead to headlines like this...
Hypocrisy is an interesting thing. As recently related at Vegan Freaks, there's the hypocrisy of considering some animals loved ones while eating others, though there's no real difference between the two, and then condemning those that eat animals you consider friends (like dogs, rabbits, or horses). The only way to avoid that charge is to not eat all animals, or to eat any animal that provides sustenance, not that you need animal protein to survive (and in fact will be in better health if you avoid animal protein).
Then there's the hypocrisy you'll read below:
In today's world, the "war" for animal rights will be won only when popular sentiment backs the type of legislation needed to ensure these rights. Threats and bombs only draw greater scrutiny, disrespect, and potential restrictions for legit AR activists.
I do want to preface this blog post by saying that the word "force" in the Independent article's title is a misuse of the word, though I suppose close enough, considering. Militants have no way of "forcing" them to stop, like an enforced law could. "Intimidate firms in to cutting all links" would be a more accurate phrase. I just like to point these types of things out when I notice them, so that we can all continue to read the media bias critically. That said, it's actions like these that lead to headlines like this...
Hypocrisy is an interesting thing. As recently related at Vegan Freaks, there's the hypocrisy of considering some animals loved ones while eating others, though there's no real difference between the two, and then condemning those that eat animals you consider friends (like dogs, rabbits, or horses). The only way to avoid that charge is to not eat all animals, or to eat any animal that provides sustenance, not that you need animal protein to survive (and in fact will be in better health if you avoid animal protein).
Then there's the hypocrisy you'll read below:
Letters sent by a group calling themselves the Animal Rights Militia (ARM) to the home addresses of directors said "your family is a target" and they would "suffer the consequences" if they did not comply with a two-week deadline to sever all links.What's disgusting and cowardly are the actions of militant AR groups terrorizing people who don't agree with them. It's hypocritical to condemn violence toward animals, and then to terrorize people because of tenuous connections to a publicly-supported company that engages in testing on animals, doing more to turn people off of animal rights than to help animals in general.
It emerged last week that directors of Leapfrog Day Nurseries had received similar letters. The company had offered childcare vouchers to staff at HLS - something they have now stopped. Now nine companies - more than half of those targeted - have severed links with HLS.
Many of the firms targeted did not even work directly for HLS - one had simply collected three lorry-loads of rubble from a construction site. Most of the companies are small-scale building contractors in the Peterborough, Huntingdon and Harrogate areas.
The letters, sent to the homes of directors at 17 companies, said: "The company you work for is working with Huntingdon Life Sciences. This is a disgusting and cowardly act. You have a choice. You can walk away from those sick monsters or you can personally face the consequences of your decision. Not only you but your family is a target. Sever your links with HLS within two weeks or get ready for your life and the lives of those you love to become a living hell."
In today's world, the "war" for animal rights will be won only when popular sentiment backs the type of legislation needed to ensure these rights. Threats and bombs only draw greater scrutiny, disrespect, and potential restrictions for legit AR activists.
Rescuers have tales to tell
Posted by Eric @ 2:41 PM
The Star-Ledger: Rescuers have tales to tell
This article focuses mainly around the efforts of one particular rescuer but offers some insights into why people are going so far to save the animals affected by Katrina (excerpt):
This article focuses mainly around the efforts of one particular rescuer but offers some insights into why people are going so far to save the animals affected by Katrina (excerpt):
Asked why he and his cohorts willingly risk their own health and safety, his answer was simple: 'Because animals are such an important part of our lives.'
Israel government ends goose force-feeding
Posted by Eric @ 2:32 PM
Jerusalem Post: Government ends goose force-feeding
Additionally, the Cabinet is putting together a committee to take care of the farmers impacted these decisions. In keeping with my belief that you can help animals and humans at the same time, I applaud this move (exerpt):
Additionally, the Cabinet is putting together a committee to take care of the farmers impacted these decisions. In keeping with my belief that you can help animals and humans at the same time, I applaud this move (exerpt):
Israel will put an end to the force-feeding of geese for culinary purposes following Agricultural Minister Yisrael Katz's withdrawal of a proposal to the cabinet Sunday that would have made the practice lawful.
In August 2003, the High Court agreed with a petition by Noah, an umbrella organization for animal rights organizations in Israel, that force-feeding geese for the production of foie gras causes unnecessary suffering.
The court ruled that foie gras production violated the Protection of Animals Law, 1994, which prohibits torture, cruelty or abuse to animals.
House passes revised Endangered Species Act
Posted by Eric @ 3:01 AM
MSNBC.com | Politics: House passes revised Endangered Species Act
Of course, this bill favors ranchers, not endangered species. It probably won't surprise you that the changes were proposed by a rancher, chairman of the House Resources Committee, GOP Rep. Richard Pombo (excerpt):
Of course, this bill favors ranchers, not endangered species. It probably won't surprise you that the changes were proposed by a rancher, chairman of the House Resources Committee, GOP Rep. Richard Pombo (excerpt):
Pombo’s bill would:Please contact your Senator to help protect the animals.
- Eliminate critical habitat. That is area now required to be designated when a species is listed and is protected from adverse actions by federal agencies. Instead, “recovery plans” for species, including designation of habitat, would have to be developed within two years. The recovery plans would not have regulatory force and the habitat would not be protected from federal actions.
- Specify that landowners with development plans are due answers from the interior secretary within 180 days, with a 180-day extension possible, about whether the development would harm protected species. If the government fails to respond in time, the development could go forward. If the government blocks the development, the landowner would be paid the fair market value of the proposed development.
- Give the interior secretary the job of determining what constitutes appropriate scientific data for decision-making under the law.
Saturday, October 01, 2005
USDA: Effects of Katrina on U.S. Agriculture
Posted by Eric @ 4:45 AM
A Preliminary Assessment of the Effects of Katrina and Drought on U.S. Agriculture
Found some hard numbers on Katrina victims... that is, the farm animal victims. This is from the USDA (excerpt):
Remember, the USDA's job is to serve the financial interests of the agriculture industry, not animal welfare, nor the health concerns of the country's citizens.
Found some hard numbers on Katrina victims... that is, the farm animal victims. This is from the USDA (excerpt):
Livestock. In Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi nearly 825,000 head of cattle and calves and over 33,000 hogs and pigs were located in counties that sustained hurricane force winds. High winds and flooding resulted in losses of building, equipment and some cattle and hogs. Of the 15,000 beef cattle left in St. Bernard Parish area, 10,000 are presumed dead. These lost animals are valued at an estimated at $8 million.There are some tables at the end of the report as well, which nails home the financial aspect of this view. If that doesn't do it, note how meat chickens are called "broilers," as is standard in the industry.
Katrina disrupted broiler production in the Gulf region, but is expected to have limited short- term negative impacts on U.S. broiler production. In Alabama, 60 percent of broiler production is in counties affected by tropical storm winds. In Mississippi, 95 percent of broiler production is in countries that sustained hurricane force winds and the remaining 5 percent is in counties that incurred tropical force winds. An estimated 200,000 chickens were lost in Alabama and over 6 million birds and 2,400 poultry barns were damaged in Mississippi. The 6.2 million broilers lost due to Katrina have an estimated market value of about $15 million. Although Hurricane Katrina has temporarily affected broiler exports, firms will shift exports to other ports, minimizing disorder. In addition, losses of eggs and poults will reduce future broiler production and producers that had their grow-out facilities destroyed will have lost production and incomes until they can be rebuilt.
Dairy. About 60,000 dairy cows were located in counties affected by hurricane force winds and 40,000 were located in counties subjected to tropical storm winds. In Louisiana and Mississippi, over two-thirds of dairy cows were in areas that experienced hurricane-force winds. Many producers suffered damage to buildings and equipment and loss of power, leaving them unable to milk their cows without generators. In addition, the absence of electricity and impassable roads prevented the processing and movement of milk to processing plants. In counties affected by hurricane force winds, lost producer sales of milk could amount to about $3 million per week. In addition, some dairy cows may have also been lost but no estimates are available. The average value of a dairy cow exceeds $1,800. There will also likely be an adverse effect on dairy cow productivity, which will reduce future milk production.
Remember, the USDA's job is to serve the financial interests of the agriculture industry, not animal welfare, nor the health concerns of the country's citizens.






















