Thursday, September 29, 2005
Bomb attack on Glaxo executive
Posted by Eric @ 6:55 PM
timesonline.co.uk: Bomb attack on Glaxo executiveUnbelievable. This is wrong in so many ways (excerpt):
The Animal Liberation Front (ALF) claimed responsibility yesterday for leaving an explosive device containing fuel outside the home of Paul Blackburn, the corporate controller of GlaxoSmithKline. It said that Mr Blackburn was singled out because GSK was a customer of the animal testing group Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS). A GSK spokesman said that the device was left on the porch of the house in Buckinghamshire and caused minor damage. Mr Blackburn was out of the country but his wife and child were at home.
How can anyone that cares about animals endanger the lives of people? Of children? Talk about the innocent...
I was previously one of those that hesitated to call militant animal rights activists terrorists, but there's no better description for this event than terrorism. Don't agree? Read this:
A website warning read: “We have spent 15 months researching you, and we know every weakness you have. We are stronger than you, we have more resolve than you and we never give up.
“If we have to destroy every bit of property you own, we will, in order to stop you inflicting your profit-driven cruelties on defenceless creatures. You cannot stop us, we are free to attack you at will, whenever and wherever we choose.”
Reprehensible. I'm sure they don't care what I think, but it certainly does not reflect well on other animal rights activists trying to make progress without harm to others.
Wednesday, September 28, 2005
A series of stories in SF Bay Guardian News about animals in UCSF labs
Posted by Eric @ 7:00 PM
These San Francisco Bay Guardian News articles are some fairly lengthy pieces on animal research at UCSF, and I'll get right to them, starting with the cover article (excerpt),
Animal instincts (excerpt):
The struggle over animal research is polarized and emotional. It's not uncommon for animal rights activists to characterize researchers as barbarians who cut up innocent animals out of joy or greed – or for the scientists to regard the activists as fringe extremists who only care about mice and monkeys and not their fellow humans.
The intensity of this debate leads many people to simply turn away – and has given UCSF an excuse to hide almost everything about animal research from the public. Citing "security concerns" created by radical animal rights activists who sometimes turn to harassment or violence, UCSF treats information about its experiments like highly classified secrets. University officials won't let outsiders tour the labs, won't acknowledge where all the animal research facilities are, and has administrators speak on behalf of individual researchers (including those mentioned in this story and its two sidebars). They insist in vague terms that researchers and their families are harassed – but they won't even describe the incidents that have led them to be so cautious.
So the general public knows very little about the 600 to 800 animal experiments, supported largely by taxpayers, being conducted at UCSF at any given time.
But there have been some real problems behind those closed laboratory doors. In fact, last year UCSF was formally charged with violating federal law in a scathing complaint about animal conditions. And it wasn't some animal welfare group lodging the allegations – it was George W. Bush's Agriculture Department.
It delves further into the subject of animal research while describing the specific situation at UCSF:
Polls show that the American public supports animal research – but only when efforts are made to contain animal suffering. So it seems almost instinctual that experimenting on animals should require weighing the pain and suffering of animals against the potential to understand and ultimately cure disease.
But the United States doesn't require this sort of formal comparison. The approval process for a scientific experiment, anyone will tell you, is quite rigorous – particularly if it involves highly competitive NIH grants. But the central question posed during this process is: Is this a valid line of scientific inquiry, one that might yield knowledge? Later in the process, once the experiment has its basic form and the protocol is forwarded to the IACUC, the researcher must explain why he or she can't do the research without animals.
The IACUC's realm, however, is animal care, not science. The committee can suggest modifications to lessen the pain animals are subjected to, but there's no requirement anywhere along the way for an explicit cost-benefit analysis.
Surely, the very least our country can do is to very actively cut back on the animals used for research with this sort of analysis, and put into place more stringent protections for the animals. While this won't appease those who want to see all animal exploitation end, it would perhaps provide a basis for reduced suffering.
The next story discusses the controversy over a specific testing program,
Dogtown (excerpt):
Olgin's research also involves the deaths of roughly 750 dogs over three years. Many of the dog have one or two pacemakers implanted. The pacemakers are then used to speed up the dogs' heart rates until their hearts basically wear out. Another group of 150 dogs undergo a surgical procedure in which their hearts' mitral valves are torn with a small hook so that some of the blood flows backward.
After 2 to 24 weeks in the study, each dog is subjected to an eight-hour "terminal study," during which researchers deeply anesthetize the animal and then open its heart cavity to poke around and take measurements. At the end of the study, the dog is euthanized.
The article goes on to describe the basic opposition arguments about whether or not certain tests are necessary. Read and consider those viewpoints. Certainly testing on dogs raises public concern about these tests that mice do not usually raise, which is assuredly one of the reasons why labs have become more and more secretive about their research (notwithstanding their concerns about liberation break-ins and the like).
Finally, we receive a devastating portrait of the horror that is vivisection, in
Monkey business (excerpt):
According to the scientific protocol for his experiments, filed with UCSF, Lisberger's monkeys undergo several different surgeries, under anesthesia, to prepare them for the research. First, each monkey has a restraint device attached to its head with a combination of metal plates, bolts, and screws. That will later allow the monkey's head to be locked in place for experiments. One or two holes are drilled in the skull, and then cylindrical recording chambers are secured over those holes so that microelectrodes that will allow precise neural activity to be measured can be inserted into the brain with ease. (The electrodes themselves don't cause discomfort because the brain lacks pain receptors.)
Sometimes, small wire coils are sutured to the monkeys' eyeballs. Other times the monkeys have spectacles attached to their faces that either magnify or miniaturize everything they see.
The monkeys in Lisberger's lab are put on a fluid-restriction program, so that each day they are scheduled to "work" they will obey commands for "rewards" of water or Tang. Each monkey is taught to move from its cage to a "primate chair," and once in the chair, its head is locked into the restraining device. Then the animal is prompted to move its eyes in certain ways to receive a reward. Monkeys typically work for two to four hours a day on alternating weeks, often for three years or more.
Lisberger's protocol states that his work could eventually lead to "the cure for many diseases of learning and memory such as Alzheimer's Disease."
Suzanne Roy, from In Defense of Animals, says she started looking into Lisberger's experiments in the late 1990s, after IDA got anonymous complaints from people who said they worked for UCSF. "What struck me was the highly invasive nature of them and the duration of them ... " she said. "He's making the monkeys so thirsty they'll move their eyes in a certain way for a juice reward. How could anyone do this to an intelligent monkey?"
Spurlock Entertains 'Super Size' Crowd
Posted by Eric @ 6:21 PM
The Indiana Gazette: Spurlock Entertains 'Super Size' Crowd
Wow. If I was his vegan chef fiancee, I'd be breaking off that engagement right about now. What? Is he overcompensating so that regular Joes will relate to him? (excerpt)
I'm not telling you, 'Never eat a hamburger.' Just eat the good ones with real beef, you know, like the ones from that mom-and-pop diner down the street," he said, making Homer Simpson-like, mouth-watering sounds. "And it's so good that when you take a bite out of that burger, you just know somewhere in the world a vegan is crying.
That's right, go ahead and chomp away on animals, but make sure they're low-fat, grass-fed animals, because what really matters is that you enjoy a juicy burger.
Tuesday, September 27, 2005
Microchip system aims to reduce the number of animals used in the development of new drugs
Posted by Eric @ 5:23 PM
News-Medical.Net: Microchip system aims to reduce the number of animals used in the development of new drugs
Is it a step in the right direction if it still makes me queasy? (excerpt)
The idea is to run the chip as if it were, for example, a rat or a dog, and to be able to tell whether this particular animal is going to be appropriate for further testing.
Dr Benet says that the chip will save a lot of animal studies, but will not eliminate them. Animal testing will still be needed by the regulatory agencies for preclinical toxicology and efficacy testing. But the microfluidic system should make the animal tests more efficient by identifying which species is most relevant in a particular case.
Dr Benet explains: 'At the moment, we don't know which animal is going to be useful. So the industry often carries out animal tests that turn out not to be predictive at all.'
What's Wrong with Vegetarianism
Posted by Eric @ 5:17 PM
The National Ledger: What's Wrong with VegetarianismThe National Ledger is a very conservative site, which raises your defenses alone when reading the title of this commentary, considering the preponderance of conservatives that are outspoken against vegetarianism.
Now this writer
is outspoken about activism, but ultimately is vegetarian and speaks in favor of it while condemning those that promote a vegetarian way of life, more or less dumping them in with extremists. This on a site with an article called
Cindy Sheehan Style of Appeasement is a Form of Surrender:
In the fall of 1971, when I was seven, my father took us six kids out to the back of the house one Saturday and we killed approximately two hundred chickens that had been housed in our garage. It was a neighborhood event. Two dozen kids ended up there that day, each given specific assignments. There were grabbers, pluckers, blood drainers. My father and brother were the only ax wielders. With the head removed and thrown into the nearby lake, the chicken's body ran aimlessly before collapsing. That winter, some of the chicken heads floated to the top of the lake and ice formed around them
These images linger and have solidified my choice of vegetarianism. I admit that extremist vegetarians can be an insufferable group. I will not take brochures for any cause, nor will I stand in the way of them being distributed. I enjoy talking with PETA or other concerned animal rights groups but I'm too lazy to join and pay dues. It's nothing personal. I feel queasy only from the self-righteous who claim they have the truth.
I will not convert you. I will not throw red paint on your mink coat. Give me leather shoes, and I'll quietly wear them until I can buy something less cruel. I won't stop you from eating genetically grown vegetables. Walk proudly with that peacock around your neck and somebody, somewhere, somehow will tell you it looks good. It's amazing how much a lifetime of humiliation can be washed away from one well-placed compliment. Allow me my Garden Burgers in a barbecue joint or an achingly politically correct, collectively-owned restaurant. If you're curious, there's always room at my table for one more person.
It seems like a number of young boys went through the rite of passage he describes above, and I would be surprised if a great number of them eventually went vegetarian.
And while I think Mr. Stephens' form of vegetarianism is perfectly acceptable (being vegetarian is a strong statement and personal choice to reduce one's contribution to unnecessary cruelty), a hardcore right-winger might think his form of appeasement is a surrender to animal exploitation (note how "well-meaning" he is in the final paragraph I quoted in the excerpt).
I'm all in favor of reasoned activism, i.e., not turning off your audience by villainizing or attacking them, but I don't see a need to congratulate people for boosting their self-esteem by wearing an animal. It seems counter-intuitive to someone who finds the killing of animals an abhorrent practice.
Monday, September 26, 2005
Euthanasia A Strain for Animal Care Workers
Posted by Eric @ 6:03 PM
Washington Post: Euthanasia A Strain for Animal Care Workers
The Washington Post makes my blog yet again, this time for their coverage of the toll on animal-loving humans caused by the epidemic of unwanted animals. There's an interesting phrase I first heard in this article, but I've seen it in many activists and people who make compassionate choices: "Compassion fatigue."
...many shelter workers adore animals but must bear the emotional brunt of animal overpopulation while putting up with a public that often derides their work and treats animals callously. The job can be so traumatic, shelter directors and psychologists say, that workers are often afflicted with nightmares, depression, suicidal thoughts and fears of going to hell.
The problem is immense:
battling animal overpopulation is a Sisyphean quest. The Humane Society of the United States estimates that shelters euthanize 3 million to 4 million animals each year.
Even at places that contribute a fraction to the toll, such as the Loudoun shelter, the work can be heartbreaking, workers say. The shelter euthanized 1,360 dogs and cats in the most recent fiscal year, about 47 percent of all the dogs and cats it took in.
We all can do our part by making sure everyone we know adopts animals instead of buying them, and that their animals are spayed or neutered. Sometimes it's only a matter of giving them an article like this to change their intentions.
Sunday, September 25, 2005
Show humanity to animals
Posted by Eric @ 7:39 PM
Show humanity to animals
This is where I just don't get the welfarists... There's still this disconnect:
I am not an animal rights advocate but rather an animal welfare advocate; there is a difference. As a hunter, pet owner and nature lover, I believe animals were put on Earth to provide humanity with companionship, assistance, food and clothing, inspiration and education. Obviously, nature gives certain species certain roles. We don't hunt the same animals we invite into our laps. But for each role animals play in our lives, we owe them something. Whether that is respect and awe, a safe and happy home, habitat protection or a quick and humane death, there is a moral code to do right by them.
"Put on Earth?" No. If you believe that, at least read Matthew Scully's
Dominion. But don't tell me what is written above jibes with this in any logical fashion:
I believe that how a person treats animals is a clear indicator of quality as a human being. Moreover, how a society treats animals is a test of humanity.
You fail that test, let me tell you.......
Lawyer Who Took On Oreos and McDonald's Fights On in Food War
Posted by Eric @ 7:32 PM
Los Angeles Times: Lawyer Who Took On Oreos and McDonald's Fights On in Food War
Grr. More myth-perpetuation (excerpt):
His all-consuming focus on the danger of trans fat notwithstanding, the British-born 51-year-old is no kook in Birkenstocks. He easily could be mistaken for a Century City attorney in a sport coat, dress slacks and open-collared shirt.
And he's no vegan either. 'I'm not part of the nuts-and-seeds crowd at all,' he laughed. 'That stuff tastes like hell. I want a good-tasting meal that I look forward to, not dread.'
While I'm glad for what he is doing to make processed foods "healthier," does he have to bash vegans with a stereotyping image and false information at the same time? I realize this makes him "normal" and like "everyone else," which supposedly makes it easier for average Americans to relate and relax about his crusade. This way people don't think he's taking away their meat... Very non-threatening.
Still, I don't see a need for the L.A. Times, much less this guy, to call healthy, compassionate people kooks (many of which refuse to wear Birkenstocks) and to say that we dread our meals. I'm sorry, but I wouldn't eat if I dreaded my meals. I look forward to my meals more now than when they were based on animal flesh, so that is just the kind of B.S. that perpetuates the stereotypes we need to fight.
Letter-writing time (please remember to be brief, thoughtful, but
pithy).
Lawyer Who Took On Oreos and McDonald's Fights On in Food War - Los Angeles Times
Posted by Eric @ 7:23 PM
Lawyer Who Took On Oreos and McDonald's Fights On in Food War - Los Angeles Times: "And he's no vegan either. 'I'm not part of the nuts-and-seeds crowd at all,' he laughed. 'That stuff tastes like hell. I want a good-tasting meal that I look forward to, not dread.' "
Trouble fix for AAFL in iTunes
Posted by Eric @ 7:20 PM
For some reason, my iTunes subscription to AAFL was not refreshing with the show I recorded 4 days ago, so unsubscribed, then
re-subscribed. For whatever reason, that did the trick. If you are having the same problem, give it a try.
Legislation would require pet to be included in evacuations
Posted by Eric @ 2:58 PM
CNN.com: Legislation would require pet to be included in evacuations
I'm glad legislators are looking at this, but we need to do more in this country to protect animals. Pets are animals people care about most, yet they are still considered property, not family, and this legislation doesn't go far enough in recognizing that (excerpt):
More than 6,000 pets have been saved in Mississippi and Louisiana, said Michael Markarian, executive vice president of the Humane Society of the United States, but tens of thousands more could still be in New Orleans alone. Texas, he said, has been better at allowing people to take their pets with them ahead of Hurricane Rita but a formal policy is still needed.
"We cannot rely on individual acts of compassion," Markarian said.
Holly Hazard, executive director of the Doris Day Animal League, said there are 4,000 outstanding requests to rescue pets more than three weeks after Katrina hit.
While the legislation may draw attention to the issue, it doesn't "have any real meat in it," said Sara Spaulding, a spokeswoman for the American Humane Association. She said uniform protocols on rescuing and sheltering animals, for example, should be formulated at the federal level with consultation from animal welfare groups.
New hospital provides world class pet care
Posted by Eric @ 2:52 PM
Westland Observer: New hospital provides world class pet care:
This place sounds pretty amazing:
Its lobby is designed resemble the waiting room of an early 20th century train station and includes a separate "quiet room," complete with fireplace, for cats.
"We know cats and dogs don't always want to be together," Bice said.
Though construction was only fully completed this week, MVS has been treating animals at the new site for about three weeks. Early patients included a Detroit Zoo penguin who received eye surgery and a pet dog whose broken leg was repaired with surgical screws.
Founded in Bloomfield Hills in 1990, MVS operated for about 12 years at a site on 11 Mile in Southfield.
The new facility is more than 40 percent larger, with 18 examining rooms, a cancer center, eye care center and state of the art operating rooms which overlook a man-made pond and fountain. The building was custom built for MVS's operations.
Friday, September 23, 2005
Workers Trying to Rescue Pets Abandoned in New Orleans
Posted by Eric @ 3:45 AM
New York Times: Workers Trying to Rescue Pets Abandoned in New OrleansThis is a highly recommended, but heartbreaking article. There's a vivid slideshow available in the left sidebar at the page linked above.
Up North Claiborne Avenue five dogs ran as a pack between the smashed houses under dead power lines, through that twisted junkscape of lumber and tin, toilets in the silt, a wall marked "Possible Body" and the headless Virgin Mary with arms outstretched. The dogs neither fought nor growled. Among their number were a German shepherd, a beagle and a yellow Labrador.
They roam this city gaunt and uncomprehending, at turns frightened and menacing, loping directionless between ruined buildings, drinking the muck, staring at cars, waiting to die. They are omnipresent. A week ago, their self-appointed rescuers spoke of the odds of rejoining them as pets to masters, but that talk has ended. Now these dogs make for an infestation, untold thousands unwell, unrestrained, unrecognizable and left to their devices.
"I'm afraid that they'll be out here for years," said Wendy Guidry, among those who spend their days trying to corral the creatures. "That there'll be a long-term population of dogs that will never be caught, that will live on the streets for years and eventually be hit by cars. That will be their lives."
I have been meaning to post about this all day, but have been on the run from about 8am until roughly midnight. I may be more scarce in the next few weeks, but I will try post often, and even podcast when I can. I don't know much yet, but I am looking at becoming involved with the Katrina recovery efforts, and quite likely Rita as well. This may well tie me up quite a bit into January. I'll post more details once I have them.
Wednesday, September 21, 2005
An Animal-Friendly Podcast for 9/21/05
Posted by Eric @ 3:42 PM
In my lengthiest
podcast to date, I discuss setting up your subscription to the Animal-Friendly Life main site through the Feedburner feed, livestock and chickens killed due to Katrina, Elephants and zoos, Oregon and wolves, Martha Stewart and PETA, and a grand jury in Texas that feels animal cruelty is not worthy of any sort of penalty. In the show, I reference a couple of recent blog entries, as well as the following articles (in order):
Daily News: L.A. must protect zoo's elephant experienceThe Seattle Times: Oregon to protect wolvesYahoo News! (AFP): US domestic diva Martha Stewart turns her back on wearing furKWTX.com: Grand Jury Declines To Indict Workers Who Drowned DogsTotal show length: 21:39
AAC
New York Skyscrapers Dim Lights to Save Birds
Posted by Eric @ 1:01 PM
Planet Ark: New York Skyscrapers Dim Lights to Save BirdsNice animal-friendly move, "Lights Out New York" (excerpt):
Since 1997, more than 4,000 migratory birds have been killed or injured from colliding into skyscrapers, bird experts said.
"New York City is this nexus of ancient migratory flyways, and the parks have become these havens for these birds, but ... the buildings with their light draw birds to them, sort of like moths to a flame," NYC Audubon Director E.J. McAdams said at a news conference.
While this will alter the twinkly look of the Manhattan skyline somewhat for certain times at certain parts of the year, it will also certainly save the city on energy costs and, as Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe said, "This is recognizing that beyond architectural beauty, natural beauty is something that can't be replaced."
Katrina causes $900 million in crop and livestock losses in Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana
Posted by Eric @ 12:57 PM
Planet Ark: Katrina and Drought Cause $2.2 Billion in US Farm LossesMore figures on animals lost due to Katrina. Of course, the USDA looks at this entirely in terms of logistics and finances, i.e., how it affects our nation's farmers or, more specifically, the big ag businesses (excerpt):
Livestock losses from Katrina were estimated at $30 million. An estimated 10,000 cattle were lost due to Katrina, the USDA said.
'Millions of chickens were killed. Producers also lost eggs, poults, and chicken grow-out facilities, which will lead to longer-term economic losses for some producers. Dairy producers discarded an estimated $3 million worth of milk,' the USDA said, because power was out and processing plants were closed.
Tuesday, September 20, 2005
Victory for Horses!
Posted by Eric @ 7:48 PM
HSUS: Victory for Horses!Thank you to all who wrote your senators regarding the horse slaughter bill proposed by John Ensign (R-NV) and Robert C. Byrd (D-WV). I just received this message from the Humane Society of the United States:
Thanks to your calls and emails, the U.S. Senate passed the Ensign-Byrd amendment on Tuesday, September 20, by a vote of 68-29.
That's a significant margin, which demonstrates a love for animals. But speciesism continues. Ensign said:
Many of the horses sent to slaughter are perfectly healthy, and turning them over to slaughterhouses is inhumane and unnecessary
Clearly it is inhumane and unnecessary, regardless of their health. I can't help but wonder why this is the case for horses, but not for cows, pigs, and chickens...
Agency targets animal damage
Posted by Eric @ 3:08 PM
Jackson Hole Star Tribune: Agency targets animal damage
More on the killing machine that is Wildlife Services:
'Wildlife Services killed more than five animals per minute in 2004,' said Wendy Keefover-Ring of Sinapu, a wolf advocacy group.
Compared to the previous article I posted on this subject, this one goes more in-depth on the issue:
Green Scissors, a coalition that targets what it terms wasteful or environmentally harmful government spending, charges that most of the Wildlife Services budget is focused on livestock protection, benefiting mostly a few Western livestock producers, relative to ag producers throughout the country.
"It's just one subsidy after another," said Franz Matzner, senior policy analyst of Taxpayers for Common Sense, which is part of the coalition.
"The program doesn't work, because predation rates haven't gone down," he added.
Green Scissors further notes that although the number of predators killed by the agency increases annually (especially coyotes), coyote populations remain stable and are spreading geographically.
Green Scissors charges that Wildlife Services' activities make predator problems worse. Biologists have found that when subjected to intense control, not only do female coyotes respond by reproducing at an earlier age and producing larger litters, but pup survival increases, thereby rendering the control efforts counterproductive. They also note that some poisons are not entirely selective, but spill out into the environment and kill other birds and animals.
Karen Dawn's latest Katrina assistance update - Please Read
Posted by Eric @ 3:38 AM
Television specials, such as last night's Dateline, focus on the happy reunions. Below is a letter, a plea, from Jane Garrison, who is heading up the food and water program from the Gonzales shelter for New Orleans. It tells a different story -- animals dying daily for lack of people to get to them and feed them. I forward her letter knowing that many of you, bless you, have contacted the major organizations saying you wanted to volunteer but have been told that your unskilled services aren't needed. Jane's letter, from the front lines, makes it clear that if you can get yourself to Gonzales, and are willing to sleep in uncomfortable conditions in a tent or car or RV, you will be saving lives every day you are there.
Below her note I will paste the shelter address and a list of supplies recommended. I do recommend going through the official means, such as volunteering through the HSUS website, www.HSUS.org. But their volunteer web-page, which still includes questions such as, "Can you stay in the area for five days?," (as if a three day stay would not mean life or death to however many animals you can feed in three days) still has a tone likely to discourage people. Please don't let it discourage you. And if the HSUS office is overwhelmed and cannot get back to you quickly, please don't let animals die while you are caught in red tape. I am sure Jane's letter below will convince you that if you show up willing to help without having successfully jumped through all the right hoops, she will not turn you away.
FROM JANE GARRISON:
---------------------------------------
Subject: I am begging the animal community
Dear Friends:
I have been at the hurricane scene in New Orleans for over two weeks. In this time I have organized search and rescue teams and food and water teams (for the animals on the streets). I have personally pulled hundreds of animals from roof tops, attics and houses. It has been amazing to me that these animals are still alive. I got a dog off a roof a few days ago who should have weighed 90 pounds but was down to 40 pounds from being stuck on that roof with no food and water. These animals want to live and are showing us this everyday.
Here is the problem.
We still have 3,000 addresses of homes where animals are trapped. These are addresses where people have called either HSUS or LASPCA and asked for us to rescue their animals. I know that there are thousands of other homes where animals are trapped that no one called about. I know this b/c I have rescued hundreds of animals from homes after hearing barking that were not on our lists.
CONSIDER THIS: Amazingly we are finding that half of the homes we get into have animals still alive. With a MINIMUM of 3,000 addresses that is at least 1500 animals who are waiting behind closed doors for a loving hand to rescue them. With the current teams we have now we can only get into approximately 300 homes each day. The animals will NEVER be alive if we continue at this rate. I am begging each and everyone of you to get to New Orleans to help. It does not take a "certified disaster rescuer" to break into a house and at last provide fresh food and water (to sustain that animal until someone qualified can get them out). We only have a week at most to save some of these desperate animals. Please do your part...we are all the animals have.
Jane Garrison
JaneGarrison AT comcast DOT net(END OF JANE'S NOTE)
--------------------------------------
GONZALES SHELTER CONTACTS:
Louisiana SPCA Shelter established at:
9093 St. Landry Rd.
Gonzales, LA 70737
225-647-0712 (This number may not be answered.)
Food and water volunteers should report to Jane Garrison outside the volunteer food tent by barns 1 and 2. There is a 6am briefing every morning.
Note: Large air-conditioned vehicles in which animals can be transported are still needed. But Jane's note makes it clear that anybody with transport for him or herself, who can go to houses and feed animals, regardless of being able to transport them, is needed. If you don't have your own transport, but can get yourself to Gonzales, you will be paired up at the daily 6am briefing meeting with somebody who has transport. OR -- the shelter desperately needs people to work there.
FEMA now has a large air-conditioned tent in which volunteers can sleep. (Though it is safest to bring a tent just in case.)
VOLUNTEER PERSONAL SUPPLIES LIST (IDEAL)
Some dogs on the ground have become dangerous. Some risks are due to contaminated water. Animals who have consumed this or stood in the water for long periods may be sick. You may also be exposed to water/mud yourselves. You also need protection from mosquitoes and wild animals. Overall, depending upon where you travel, you need to come self-sufficient, as if preparing for a camping trip.
current Hepatitis vaccinations
current Tetanus shot
pepper spray
hand sanitizer
insect repellent
sunscreen
first aid kits
thick "bite-proof" work gloves
sturdy, waterproof (rubber) work boots/shoes
waders
long sleeve shirts
long pants
belt (to hang gear/supplies from)
mouth coverings (surgical masks, bandannas)
eye protection (sunglasses)
flashlights
containers full of gasoline
waterproof walkie talkies
D batteries
toilet paper
other personal-care items
----------------------------------------
Kate Danaher, who has just come back from Gonzales, has sent the following note:
"I just returned from 7 days on-site at the Lamar Dixon Expo Center in Gonzales, LA. Volunteers are desperately needed to clean shelter cages and walk dogs, to drop food and water to feed animals in the streets and stuck in houses, to do data entry of notes from the field, to clean crates, and do general site organization and clean-up. If you are interested please call me. I can brief you on my experience and give you directions on what to expect and how to get right to work when you arrive.
Do not need supplies. Need strong loving and patient people to work very very hard under very challenging circumstances.
You are NEEDED.
Please consider this call for help.
I look forward to hearing from you."
Kate recommends bringing spray paint, for marking and dating houses with food and water drop dates (what you did at the house) and also water markers to mark your vehicle as LASPCA, pad and pen for field notes, a crowbar for breaking in if necessary, and maps of New Orleans. She is happy to provide guidance for anybody ready to go. Her number is: 415-459-1149
katedanaher@animalearthhuman.org
Brenda Shoss at Kinship Circle is also an excellent resource for information on volunteer efforts at the various shelters.
Her email is info@kinshipcircle.org
desk: 314-863-9445
cell: 314-795-2646
----------------------------------------------------------
(DawnWatch is an animal advocacy media watch that looks at animal issues in the media and facilitates one-click responses to the relevant media outlets. You can learn more about it, and sign up for alerts at http://www.DawnWatch.com. To unsubscribe, go to www.DawnWatch.com/unsubscribe.php. If you forward or reprint DawnWatch alerts, please do so unedited -- leave DawnWatch in the title and include this tag line.)
----------------------------------------------------------
Picture: PETA Demonstrator Holds a Banner at the Julien Macdonald Fashion Show in London
Posted by Eric @ 1:56 AM
Monday, September 19, 2005
Yup, "Starved" made animal-friendly people look like freaks
Posted by Eric @ 10:42 PM
Finally got a chance to watch the season finale of "Starved."
The whole breatharian thing is definitely a mockery of "isms," particularly the more esoteric aspects of veganism and other ahimsa-oriented beliefs. Early in the episode, before the first commercial break, Shanti introduces Sam to a breatharian at his breatharian/animal rights display, mocking AR in one broad stroke, as well. At least the breatharian looks fairly healthy! Big whoop.
In the next scene, Sam basically comes off as a loon, his desperation to lose weight "sucking" him completely into the whole breatharian mindset like some sort of programmed automaton.
Near the end of the episode, they bump into Shanti's friend at a restaurant. He evidently works with PETA for their "ethical extraction of rodents from restaurants" program, and is on his way out from the kitchen with a bag of rats.
He does break up with her, but not because of her veganism or his own weirdness about all that, but it turns out he's still in love with one of his friends. As for how he feels about her, he's basically not into all her "non-violence stuff," as it's not his "bag." At least Miss Karma puts her foot down and calls him on his behavior (she calls him an "asshole"). And one assumes that is that. When his friend, who is falling in love with someone else, calls all vegan/breathear/etc/ism is "bullshit," he immediately says he'll never eat like that again. I mean, it's pretty much typical in how crappy it is.
Hard to feel bad about deeply disturbed characters casually taking on and dumping lifestyle choices for superficial reasons instead of compassionate ones, but still a very annoying portrayal that leaves everyone looking crappy.
Would-be pet volunteers, hang tight for now
Posted by Eric @ 4:37 PM
MetroWest Daily News: Would-be pet volunteers, hang tight for nowRead this article, but bear in mind that I have information from Kinship Circle on how you can become involved RIGHT NOW. Your help is very much needed.
Excerpt:
In particular, they are discouraging individuals or groups from going down south on rescue missions without coordination with a national animal group, or some authority overseeing pet rescue efforts. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, for example, has asked would-be volunteers to stand down unless otherwise directed.
One thing the article does address that everyone should be reminded of is that adopting any animal in a shelter near them is a good thing right now. You may well be helping a Katrina victim by clearing space and freeing resources for those animals to be rescued and restored to health.
New animal welfare standards for meat processors
Posted by Eric @ 4:36 PM
ABC Rural: New animal welfare standards for meat processorsThis Australian article is extremely vague. If I come across details, I certainly post them (excerpt):
The meat processing sector has a new set of national animal welfare standards, and those who fail to comply could lose their licence.
The legally enforceable code has been established by both industry and animal welfare groups, and will apply to all abattoirs.
Initiative opposes confined livestock
Posted by Eric @ 4:33 PM
The Arizona Republic: Initiative opposes confined livestockThis one's bound to generate continuing media attention, as the meat industry is organizing to defeat the initiative (excerpt):
Arizonans will have some big choices to make during the 2006 election year, and one of the biggest could involve pregnant pigs.
Animal-rights activists have filed an initiative that would make it a crime for farmers to keep young calves or pregnant pigs in crates so cramped that the animals can't turn around.
Opponents already are rallying to defeat the measure, calling it "anti-meat."
Not exactly. People that do eat meat want to know the animals haven't suffered too greatly. Makes it easier to keep on keeping on. These measures do have at least one precedent:
Florida voters passed a similar measure in 2002. Arizona's new law, if it passed, wouldn't take effect until the end of 2012, letting farms change their farming practices over the next six years.
Croatian Zoo Features Humans Exhibit
Posted by Eric @ 4:31 PM
Yahoo News! (AP): Croatian Zoo Features Humans ExhibitI've ruminated on something like this for a while, as some sort of public display in heavily trafficked areas. Even better to see it at a zoo! (excerpt):
ZAGREB, Croatia - Ever feel like a caged animal? Visitors to Zagreb's zoo can find out what it is really like to be in a cage.
The zoo has set aside two partially furnished cages for humans labeled "Homo Sapiens." Visitors will be able to enter and leave at will.
But the project, launched Friday by the head of the zoo, Mladen Anic, goes beyond offering a behind-the-bars experience to warn about human devastation of nature.
"We wanted people to get a perception of how the animal perceives the cage," Anic told The Associated Press. "But we also wanted to inform people about all the ecological problems for which humans are directly responsible."
There should be one of these in
every zoo.
Rockland private school goes veggie
Posted by Eric @ 4:29 PM
The Journal News: Rockland private school goes veggieI'm still kind of in shock (awe?) over this one (excerpt):
For the first time in more than a decade, Rockland Country Day has changed lunch vendors from a commercial organization to a local restaurant. After a year of committee meetings, taste tests and student and parent comment, the school signed a one-year contract with Main Essentials, a Haverstraw vegetarian restaurant that caters to vegans — vegetarians who also don't eat dairy or other animal products.
"We know there's an obesity crisis and a crisis of disease in this country, and a lot of it stems from the kind of foods and the fast foods that people ingest," said Martha Roth, a parent and member of the committee that selected Main Essentials as the school's food vendor. "If you start early, if you teach children to eat well at an early age, it won't be an issue when they get older."
Local public schools usually offer a meatless option for students and have tried to cut down on sugar and salt in other foods, but none has done what Rockland Country Day has — hired a vegetarian restaurant to provide school lunches.
The school cafeteria is nearly vegan, though turkey hot dogs will be available, and sandwiches will be served with cheese, with soy cheese available as an option. Still,
outstanding. This is one to watch. If it continues to be successful, we will hopefully see more schools serving healthier, more animal-friendly fare like this. Surely kids can eat one vegetarian meal out of their entire day. After all:
Nonvegetarians such as ninth-graders Norma Kuhling, 14, of Valley Cottage; Hailey Fyfe, also 14, of Piermont; and 10th-grader Katie Crispi, 15, of New City said they found the school lunches infinitely better than last year.
"You just sort of feel good," Fyfe said, "after eating a healthy meal."
Psst! Pass it on...
Advocates Challenge Humane-Care Label on Md. Eggs
Posted by Eric @ 4:29 PM
Washington Post: Advocates Challenge Humane-Care Label on Md. EggsCompassion Over Killing continues its
so-far successful fight against misleading egg labelling (excerpt):
The "Animal Care Certified" stamp on the grocery store egg cartons declared that the chickens were raised in humane conditions, but the tapes tell a different tale.
The videos -- shot by Takoma Park animal advocates who say they have spent years sneaking into local poultry farms -- show hens closely packed in wire "battery cages," some missing most of their feathers, with open sores and burned beaks, and dead fowl caged with the living.
In February, the videos prompted the group, Compassion Over Killing, to file a lawsuit in D.C. Superior Court against area retailers Giant Food, Brookville Supermarket and Lehman's Egg Service and the organization that administers the Animal Care Certified certification, United Egg Producers.
Giant recently agreed to drop the logo from egg cartons sold under its brand name while it reviews Compassion Over Killing's claims that the birds are kept in inhumane conditions.
The group, which seeks to ban the use of the label, will go forward with claims against the other parties, including United Egg Producers, which has filed a motion to dismiss the case. But animal advocates hailed the settlement with Giant as a first step toward their goal of ending the use of cages in the U.S. egg industry.
Have I mentioned how much I love COK?
New rules ban farmers from denying water to veal calves
Posted by Eric @ 1:50 AM
Haaretz.com: New rules ban farmers from denying water to veal calvesNot an outright victory, but progress in Israel:
Animal rights groups notched up another success recently when the Agriculture Ministry banned farmers from denying water to veal calves as part of the method by which they are raised for slaughter. Some two years ago, the animal rights groups won a High Court of Justice ruling that bans the force-feeding of geese.
Withholding water from veal calves constitutes a central part of the manner in which the animals are raised for slaughter, with the objective being to keep their meat tender and "white." Aside from withholding water, raising veal calves also involves imprisoning them in a veal crate and feeding them a milk substitute intentionally lacking in iron and other essential nutrients.
The animals suffer terribly because they are unable to move freely in the wooden restraining device and cannot turn around or even lie down and stretch. Designed to prevent movement, the crate does its job of atrophying the calves' muscles, thus producing tender veal.
It goes on, and in great detail. These practices are not exclusive to Israel, but it is nice to see progress on this front, and to see also that force-feeding of geese for foie-gras was already banned two years ago.
These new rules are a start, but only that:
Anonymous for Animal Rights initiated the fight against this method of raising veal calves - banned already among EU states - some four years ago. Since then, the Agriculture Ministry has tried to formulate new regulations for the feeding and raising of veal calves, but the regulations have been rejected time and again by the Knesset Education Committee, which has deemed them insufficient to prevent the animals from suffering.
Recently, however, the Agriculture Ministry, the Education Committee and Anonymous consented to the temporary publication of two regulations that all the parties agree to and that do not require financial investment on the part of the farmers. The first regulation imposes a sweeping ban on withholding water from the calves. The second regulation requires farmers to provide calves that are at least four weeks old with solid food.
Girls and Boys, Meet Nature. Bring Your Gun.
Posted by Eric @ 1:19 AM
New York Times: Girls and Boys, Meet Nature. Bring Your Gun.
Flip title to this article, which ultimately seems to favor this practice.
But isn't it fascinating how some of the same people that criticize AR activists for targeting youth are pretty much the same people trying to turn them into hunters instead? Here's a brief example of how lovely one of these people actually is (excerpt):
Mr. Hoyt also tries to speak at schools, but he says that of 114 he has contacted, only 10 have invited him in.
"When I contact the schools they say, 'Is this to promote hunting?' " Mr. Hoyt said. "And actually I lie right through my teeth. I say, 'No, it is to explain hunting.' "
He added, "I hate to stereotype, but most teachers are liberal, tree-hugging, and they're not real sympathetic to the cause."
Shark Attacks Spark "Kill or Be Killed" Debate
Posted by Eric @ 12:56 AM
Planet Ark | FEATURE: Shark Attacks Spark "Kill or Be Killed" Debate:
I can understand being upset about being attacked by a shark, but that's one of the dangers of surfing. We as a species must stop behaving as if we can do whatever we want in the world, and damn the consequences. Kudos to the scientists that point out the flaws with Jake Heron's proposal (exerpt):
Displaying his savaged surfboard, bitten in half by the shark, Heron is adamant that Australia should end its protection of the great white and start culling.
'They're top of the food chain and nothing affects it,' Heron told reporters after his attack.
'It's time they started controlling the numbers. Controlled culling -- they kill our national emblem, the kangaroo, they kill elephants in Africa,' he said."
(I guess while he's at it, he should be trying to cull the shoe manufacturers who kill kangaroo for their leather)
Anti-Fur Protesters Storm London Fashion Show
Posted by Eric @ 12:49 AM
Planet Ark: Anti-Fur Protesters Storm London Fashion Show
Irritating (excerpt)
'There are far more important things to worry about like the tsunami and what happened in New Orleans than worrying about a fur coat and a dead animal,' [Julien Macdonald] told reporters after the show.
I'm getting a bit fed up with the presumption that caring about cruelty to animals for fashion is somehow unimportant simply because larger tragedies are occurring. If NO is more important than fur coats and dead animals, then it sure must be more important than fashion week. Maybe he should have withdrawn his collection and volunteered his time and efforts in New Orleans instead...
Sunday, September 18, 2005
Update on Katrina and the Animals
Posted by Eric @ 11:40 PM
An MSNBC "pet central" if you will, this site is pretty much all Katrina-focused at the moment:
Pet Health (includes videos and slideshows), and tonight on Dateline, the last 9 minutes of the show focused on pet rescues, including various arresting images, including several rescues as they happened, and one that didn't' make it. I hope you had a chance to catch that. If any reader knows where to access some video from tonight's, please let me know where I can link to.
Also,
Press Release: 642 Animals Rescued and Being Cared for by Noah's Wish and Slidell Animal Control in LouisianaExcerpt:
Noah's Wish, a not-for-profit organization that works exclusively to rescue and shelter animals in disasters, is caring for 642 rescued animals at a temporary shelter in Slidell, Louisiana. Cats, dogs, rabbits, ducks, chickens, geese, a rat, a snake, a turtle, hamsters, a scorpion, a tarantula and one emu are among the animals that have been rescued in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina by Noah's Wish and Slidell Animal Control.
Wichita Eagle: Pet rescues ongoing in New OrleansExcerpt:
I think all people with pets have discovered we need them as much as they need us
WSTM.com: Rescued chickens find shelter in SchuylerExcerpt:
More than a 1,000 chickens rescued from a Mississippi poultry farm ravaged by Hurricane Katrina have been sent to an animal shelter in Schuyler County as well as to shelters in Texas and California.
Farm Sanctuary, an animal haven in the town of Tyrone near Watkins Glen, has welcomed 725 of the birds.
Shelter spokeswoman Tricia Ritterbusch says the two-week-old broiler chicks arrived early this past week.
Zoo drama after animal escapes
Posted by Eric @ 4:49 PM
BBC NEWS | England | Devon: Zoo drama after animal escapes
Is it just me, or have animals been escaping the zoo more frequently lately? (excerpt):
Visitors to Paignton Zoo fled to safety inside the attraction's buildings after one of the zoo's animals escaped.
The female peccary, a member of the pig family, escaped on Saturday afternoon and visitors were contained while a vet was called.
After 40 minutes the tusked creature, which is classified as one of the zoo's dangerous animals, was cornered in the elephant enclosure.
A vet shot it with a tranquilliser dart and it is now recovering.
At least this one wasn't killed.
Saturday, September 17, 2005
Celebrity chef attacks hen farming as cruel
Posted by Eric @ 3:38 AM
BBC NEWS | UK | England | Cornwall: Stein attacks 'cruel' hen farming:
Well, at least he touches upon one of the basic tenets I espouse, "think before you eat" (excerpt):
Celebrity chef Rick Stein has criticised what he called 'cruel' British battery farming methods.
In his BBC Two TV series French Odyssey he said force-feeding of ducks in France to make foie gras was no worse than keeping battery hens.
Mr Stein, from Padstow in Cornwall, said he enjoyed the French delicacy, but urged consumers to consider where their food came from.
I just wish his thinking extended further than his enjoyment of animal parts. As PETA's Sean Gifford pointed out:
"Pointing to one area of cruelty to justify another is ridiculous."
This piece includes photos, so it's worth checking out, especially if you've never seen a row of battery hens, or the forced stuffing of a goose for foie gras. Kudos to them for publishing it. Too bad pictures don't convey the true horror of these practices, but you'd think they'd be bad enough. Fortunately many of the replies to the article are from animal-friendly people.
Giant to Halt Eggs' Animal Care Logo
Posted by Eric @ 3:32 AM
Washington Post | The Region: Giant to Halt Eggs' Animal Care Logo
A great COK win for consumers and the animals:
Giant Food of Maryland, in response to a lawsuit filed by an animal advocacy group, has agreed to stop using a logo on cartons of its store-brand eggs that certifies them as coming from humanely treated chickens.
In February, the group, Compassion Over Killing, and four egg consumers filed a lawsuit in D.C. Superior Court against Giant Food, Brookville Supermarket and Lehman's Egg Service alleging that the "Animal Care Certified" logo stamped on egg cartons by United Egg Producers deceives shoppers by conveying a false message of humane animal care.
Erica Meier, a spokeswoman for Compassion Over Killing, said Giant will remove the logo from its egg cartons while it investigates claims that the chickens are kept in wire cages so small that they can't spread their wings and that chicks have parts of their beaks burned off to reduce the impact of stress-induced aggression.
A spokesman for Giant said the agreement applies only to Giant-brand eggs sold in the District. The suit against the remaining defendants will go forward, Meier said.
Awesome job by COK, one of my favorite organizations. Erica is the Executive Director, btw, not merely a spokesperson. (no offense intended to spokespeople, but they are mouthpieces, not activists)
Animal cruelty is raging throughout the U.S.
Posted by Eric @ 3:21 AM
Putnam County Courier | News: Animal cruelty is raging throughout the U.S.:
One more reason why animal cruelty is a
human issue (excerpt):
(Dr. Harry) Hovel said every year more than 4,000 teens under the age of 18 commit murder. 'Virtually all of them were abused and began abusing animals by their early teenaged years,' he said.
This is one reason I believe it is of utmost importance to teach children respect for animals from a very early age, which is part and parcel with not eating them. That said, I realize this is a complex issue, with some children dealing with abusive parents, and others having potential genetic disorders that might predispose them toward a lack of compassion. But the cycle of violence must end, and an important place to break the chain is violence to animals.
Friday, September 16, 2005
Two more pet-related stories on Katrina (the good and the bad)
Posted by Eric @ 2:59 AM
First, the good:
Los Angeles Times: A Bone, a Bath and a Window Seat(requires a free subscription, but I link to the L.A. Times a lot, since it's my local rag, and it's worth signing up -- they never send me anything)
There have been several stories covering animal-only flights out of the Gulf Coast and toward California. Here's an excerpt from one (kudos to all involved):
'It was the best flight I ever had ... the first flight where I kissed and hugged all the passengers. They were so sweet and desperate for affection and help,' said Kimberly Wnuk, one of six flight attendants and pilots who donated their time for the airlift.
Sunday's flight from Baton Rouge, La. -- the first -- brought 80 dogs and cats to San Diego and San Francisco. Another plane arrived Tuesday in San Francisco with 152 animals, and still another flight is expected to land later this week in Los Angeles.
The airlifts -- each costing about $45,000 -- were sponsored by Texas oilman T. Boone Pickens and his wife, Madeleine, part of a larger effort by animal welfare groups to find homes across the country for animals in crowded shelters in Louisiana and Mississippi.
More than 2,000 animals, including 1,300 dogs, 400 birds and several hundred cats, are at the main shelter in the New Orleans area. Rescue crews are picking up several hundred more daily. Officials say as many as 50,000 may still be stranded.
BTW, I realize I use "kudos" a lot, but "carrot" is already taken, so feel free to suggest something more original and less, I don't know, corny.
Then, the bad. Not all animals are faring so well:
Planet Ark: Rescuers Struggle to Save Pets after Katrina(excerpt):
"The animals down here are totally traumatized," said Dr. John Twomey, chief medical officer at the disaster clinic. "Even their own dogs and cats are turning on people."
Follow up on FX's Starved
Posted by Eric @ 2:51 AM
I didn't check to see if I recorded the next installment of Starved tonight. I got in late from a long day of working, working, working, and I don't remember one way or the other. I'll check, and if I missed it, it airs again Sunday (9 PST) and Monday (8 PST), again on FX.
Here's my write-up on last week's episode.
From the episode title of the finale, "The Breatharians," and the brief write-up at
FX's site, it doesn't look promising. Shanti persuades Sam to try a diet of sunlight and air, and he dumps her. I don't know anything beyond that, but I will endeavor to look into it ASAP.
A Chicago Alderman's Proposal to Ban Foie Gras Stirs Up a Debate - New York Times
Posted by Eric @ 2:42 AM
New York Times: A Chicago Alderman's Proposal to Ban Foie Gras Stirs Up a DebateHere's an article regarding a proposed foie gras ban in Chicago, and it reveals the general sentiments animal-friendly people are up against. I actually agree that it would be better to let people decide to avoid foods instead of legislating food choices, but at the same time I'm in favor of an animal's right to live it's life as naturally as possible, assuming it would be at all alive in the first place, so rather than legislating diet, we should be legislating rights for animals, like to not be force-fed so their livers don't balloon to ten times their normal size. Here's a
taster's sampleexcerpt from the
menustory:
Rick Tramonto, 43, a well-known Chicago chef at the restaurant Tru, called the proposed ban a travesty and said he wondered where the line would be drawn because other animals, like chickens, were mistreated. 'Foie gras has been around since the age of cuisine,' Mr. Tramonto said. 'Some animals are raised for food. They're raised to die.'
Interesting that he recognizes publicly that chickens are mistreated. But then, it's justified immediately by tradition and, what? Linguists, help me out here... Property rights? We breed them, so they belong to us to do with as we please? Charming. That brings us back to speciesism, which I don't think has much value as a term for talking to real people, but frankly, why do we raise some animals as pets, and others as food? Why is it wrong to eat dog liver, but not goose liver?
Definitely visit the page, read more details and quotes, and write a smart, thoughtful letter to the editor that meets their guidelines. There's no reason for something this cruel and unnecessary to continue if there's a chance it can be stopped.
Newport's War on Sea Lions
Posted by Eric @ 2:31 AM
L.A. Times: Newport's War on Sea LionsAnother great example of man and nature not co-existing very peacefully. We kinda like things our way... Excerpt:
Not long ago, humans had the upper hand in this battle of man and beast. But after California sea lions were hunted nearly to extinction, Congress passed the 1972 Marine Mammal Protection Act, which made it illegal to kill, injure or — in most circumstances — even harass sea lions and other pinnipeds.
Lawmakers never envisioned that the law would work so well, said Matt Streit, a spokesman for the House Resources Committee. In response, a bill has been drafted to allow cities to use nonlethal methods to repel sea lion incursions.
There's some pictures at the site, along with a fairly in-depth story, including some colorful characters (yes, the sea lions, too).
Lost in Katrina, dolphins 'flipping' to be found
Posted by Eric @ 2:18 AM
MSNBC.com | Hurrican Katrina: Lost in Katrina, dolphins 'flipping' to be foundMore on non-companion animals (excerpt):
GULFPORT, Miss. - In an “unheard of” rescue operation, eight dolphins that were swept out of their oceanarium by Hurricane Katrina have been rediscovered hundreds of yards out at sea where trainers are tracking, feeding and caring for them.
“To find all eight of them on your doorstep is just unheard of,” said Moby Solangi, president of the Marine Life Oceanarium in Gulfport. “When we first saw them, they were really starving. When they saw their trainers, they were absolutely flipping.”
The eight Atlantic bottlenose dolphins were swept out of their tank by the storm surge from Katrina, which then destroyed the oceanarium.
More ont his story:
Planet Ark: Two Mississippi Dolphins Rescued after Katrina
Katrina floods wipe out years of research
Posted by Eric @ 2:16 AM
MCNBC.com | Health Care: Katrina floods wipe out years of research
As part of my effort to keep tabs on what happened and is happening to animals affected by Katrina, I'm digging around for stories about farmed animals and lab animals in addition to the much easier to find (now) pet stories.
This is the only mention of the animals in the entire article, which is linked above:
LSU lost all of its 8,000 lab animals, including mice, rats, dogs and monkeys. Many drowned. Others died without food and water and the rest were euthanized, said Dr. Larry Hollier, dean of the LSU Health Sciences Center School of Medicine.
Note the perfunctory nature of this paragraph, and how faceless all these animals are. Makes it real easy to skim past the fact that dogs and monkeys are being used in these experiments. Not that it's better to use mice and rats, but that people seem to be more speciest toward "pest" animals in general. I wonder how anyone who reads this will take the mention of dogs and monkeys, or if they'll even blink... I can't remember how I used to see stuff like this anymore. I'm not sure I even noticed.
Thursday, September 15, 2005
September 14 Podcast - The Week In Review
Posted by Eric @ 1:49 AM
MP3 |
AACKeep horses out of slaughterhouses by acting now.
More thoughts on Katrina.
Vegan restaurants.
Wednesday, September 14, 2005
Inventor fuels car with dead cats
Posted by Eric @ 10:43 PM
CNN.com: Inventor fuels car with dead catsSick:
Koch said around 20 dead cats added into the mix could help produce enough fuel to fill up a 50-liter (11 gallon) tank.But the president of the German Society for the Protection of Animals, Wolfgang Apel, said using dead cats for fuel was illegal.'There's no danger for cats and dogs in Germany because this practice is outlawed in Germany,' Apel told Bild on Wednesday
But quite possibly not accurate:
German Inventor: I Never Used Dead Cats for Fuel
URGENT: Horse Slaughter Vote Coming in the Senate
Posted by Eric @ 8:44 PM
This truly only takes a few seconds, and the more voices our senators hear, the harder it will be to serve business interests instead of the interests of the people. Do the horses matter more to them or us?
HSUS: Take Action | Horse Slaughter Vote Coming in the Senate
Shameful policy caused many pets' deaths
Posted by Eric @ 8:10 PM
NY Newsday: Shameful policy caused many pets' deathsI wrote over the weekend that Karen Dawn had
an Op-Ed published in the Washington Post. Today she is published again in NY Newsday, which has a huge circulation (excerpt):
Gandhi said, "The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated." How embarrassing it must be for our government to see that in emergencies the United States lags behind Cuba, whose treatment of animals saved the animals' lives and those of the people who care for them. In the wake of Katrina, the shameful no-pet policies of American relief agencies killed some people, mostly poor. It devastated many more, who will rebuild their homes but will never get over the awful choice a great nation should not have forced them to make.
Pets in Peril
Posted by Eric @ 1:09 PM
MSNBC.com | Newsweek Hurricane Katrina Coverage: Pets in Peril
This seems to be a popular -- though somewhat overdramatically named -- article over at MSNBC.com. It's more about pets that have been rescued and what's happening with them than actual animals in peril (excerpt):
Some people won’t understand why you’re expending so many resources on animals.
These animals are part of our society. We choose to domesticate them and live with them. They mean everything to some people. They’re family members. When a disaster happens, people [come] first, no question. But if there’s a way, we should be getting the animals out as well. It’s not like they can fend for themselves. It’s cruel to let them starve when there are people who can take care of them.
I don't know. I was a bit ambivalent about some of this person's answers, but I think there's some interesting information that comes out in the interview nonetheless.
1,000 chickens that rode out the storm now escape the frying pan
Posted by Eric @ 1:54 AM
SFGate.com: 1,000 chickens that rode out the storm now escape the frying pan... Vacaville woman leads rescue effort at Mississippi farm
A glimmer of brightness among all the darkness surrounding Katrina's aftermath:
"There were thousands dead -- they were scattered around like trash,'' she said. "The odor is indescribable. It's just of death and of rotting bodies.''
Chickens aren't easily caught during the day, but by nightfall, the group began collecting the scattered birds and placing them in a makeshift holding pen. In just two nights, the group collected about 1,000 birds -- including 19 that had been bulldozed into a burial pit with thousands of dead chickens and inches of maggots.
"Thank God we walked by that pit one last time,'' said Sturla, describing the difficult conditions the group faced.
Sturla, who also rescued two black kittens from a garbage Dumpster, said that half of the saved chickens were now headed for New York. The other half are on their way to Texas, where they will spend a few days getting stronger before they can be transported elsewhere. Sturla said a minimum of 100 would be brought to her Vacaville sanctuary, which is home to about 350 farm animals, and she will commit more if she can find local residents willing to adopt them.
"The irony is this disaster saved their lives,'' she said. "We'll do everything we can to give them a comfortable life.''
Tuesday, September 13, 2005
Vegan Vixens' Top 9 Veg Restaurants in L.A. on KCAL 9
Posted by Eric @ 10:17 PM
KCAL 9: 9 On The TownTonight on Los Angeles' local station, KCAL Channel 9, the Vegan Vixens visited the top 9 vegetarian restaurants in L.A.
Now, the Vegan Vixens can come off a bit ditzy and there were some inaccuracies that grated, like mispronouncing the #1 restaurant's name and misspelling it, and calling seitan soy-based (it's wheat-based), but it was cool to watch over ten minutes of vegan-based television on a station that reaches anyone in Los Angeles who has a TV.
The host, Hunter Ellis, is not a vegan, but he was engaging about it in the segment, and even complimented Vegan Glory's Chicken Satay, saying he was "sold. That's awesome!" The show even showed some brief undercover footage of how animals are treated in modern agriculture, so that was
very cool.
Still not sure what their exact criteria were for determining the best, so the bottom half was a little strange to me, but the top four made sense. I'll list them for you here. You can find the exact addresses and phone numbers via the link above.
Locals will recognize most of these, though I must confess to personally never having heard of #9, and now I want to go!
- 9. Tierra Cafe (looked like it was part of a food court)
- 8. Vegan Glory (I put this ahead of California Vegan and Truly, though both are frequent destinations of mine -- I prefer Vegan Glory's ambiance to both, and the menu is comparable, but slightly better than California Vegan)
- 7. Truly A Vegan Restaurant (I went to this new place for the first time only recently, and the food was very good -- though the soy bacon tasted suspiciously like Bac-O-Bits. The decor left much to be desired, though)
- 6. California Vegan (They mention the newer WLA location, but their first location is in on Sunset Blvd. in Hollywood, between Fairfax and La Brea)
- 5. Vegetable Delight (I've never been here, either)
- 4. Follow Your Heart (a bit far for me to get to much)
- 3. Native Foods (another frequent destination)
- 2. Real Food Daily (another frequent destination)
- 1. Madeleine Bistro (click for my review)
Rescue effort turns to weak, scared pets
Posted by Eric @ 3:57 PM
KRT Wire: Rescue effort turns to weak, scared pets
(originally in the Dallas Morning News, which requires a free subscription, so I linked you to the above for your convenience)
While a number of animals have died in New Orleans and continue to die, it is good to see the effort going on to rescue as many as possible. I'm incredibly happy that so many people have volunteered their time and money to save the animals, from washing them and starting their charts, all the way up to chartering flights to relocate them. If you have been considering adding a companion animal to your family, please look into adopting one. It doesn't even matter whether it's an animal that came from the South or not, so long as you adopt and create more room for incoming animals at the shelter.
Excerpt:
Maciel and several other Humane Society workers and volunteers were busy tracking down cats Monday afternoon. Another team had identified a house with 13 cats and managed to catch four of them earlier in the day.
The tiny, sweltering guesthouse was covered in garbage and smelled of feces and cat urine.
While some team members positioned nets in open doorways in the house, others went into the corners and crevices and tried to coax out the cats. Every so often, a feline would dart into the open, sometimes managing to evade his rescuers with a graceful leap.
Cats caught in nets were subdued with a pinch to the scruff, then lowered into crates. A few meowed in mourning. The crew caught all nine.
Billionaire unveils plan for N.C. biotech facility
Posted by Eric @ 3:37 PM
Lexington Herald-Leader: Billionaire unveils plan for N.C. biotech facility
Murdock, 82, who follows a strict vegetarian diet that he thinks will help extend his life, said the research campus is an investment in the future of biotechnology that can improve nutrition.
While I've been cautionary about GMOs and all the animal testing that goes on in biotech, I'm certainly not anti-science, and not even strictly anti-biotech, as I think there are genuine scientific principles there that will lead to major breakthroughs. I found it interesting that a strict vegetarian (notice he didn't call himself, or the paper didn't call him, vegan) is developing a major biotechnology center. I'd like to know more about what types of biotech studies David Murdock has in mind. It sounds like he's a strict vegetarian to prolong his life, not for the animals.
Feds killed 2.7 million 'nuisance' animals in '04
Posted by Eric @ 2:23 AM
Seattle Post-Intelligencer: AP - Washington, D.C.: Feds killed 2.7 million 'nuisance' animals in '04It boggles the mind... Note that this is in increase of one million animals over 2003! (excerpt):
The largest number of animals killed - 2.3 million - were starlings, which are attracted to feedlots and defecate in cattle feed. Critics say the poison used also kills owls, hawks, magpies, raccoons and cats. The department also uses aerial gunning, traps or 'denning,' which involves killing animals in their dens.
'Most of the public has no idea that a significant portion of the federal wildlife management budget is actually devoted to extermination,' said Jeff Ruch, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility. 'Animals that inconvenience humans become expendable `varmints' that are then dispatched with stunning efficiency.'
Among the animals killed were:
-75,674 coyotes.
-31,286 beavers.
-3,907 foxes.
-397 black bears.
-359 cougars.
-191 wolves.
-143 feral or free-ranging chickens
-72 wild turkeys
Little love shown for animal bills
Posted by Eric @ 2:03 AM
SignOnSanDiego.com > News > State -- Little love shown for animal billsI know it's been a busy day for posts, so forgive me if this is a bit overwhelming, but there's simply so much in the news lately. I like to try to get this stuff out as soon as I can after it's published. Here's a couple of excerpts from an article talking about animal protection legislation:
Although there is a long-term trend toward more animal protection, some of the advocates who worked on two dozen animal bills introduced in the Legislature this year say they are not making much progress.
*snip*
Animal protection groups have scored some of their biggest victories by going directly to the voters and bypassing the Legislature.
And, thank goodness for that. Hey, even Schwarzenegger's not above trying that strategy...
This next quote leads me to my next story:
The ban on traps pushed by animal protection groups has not been welcomed by everyone. A spokesman for the state Department of Fish and Game, Steve Martarano, said the ban "took away an effective tool used by researchers and to control nuisance wildlife.
Nuisance wildlife... What an awful, awful term.
Lincoln Journal Star Online
Posted by Eric @ 12:42 AM
Lincoln Journal Star Online: Three chimps shot after escape from Zoo NebraskaThis is a bit depressing. Does it remind anyone else of King Kong? Wild animals don't belong in cities, much less zoos:
Collins said the four animals escaped from the zoo and ran into Royal, a community of about 75 people in Antelope County. The chimps tried to get into a couple of businesses in town, Collins said, before returning to the zoo.
Schlueter said later that only one of the chimps — he’s not sure which one — actually left the zoo and walked about a block and a half into town. The animal opened the door of a convenience store, but an Antelope County sheriff’s deputy at the scene shut the door right away, and the chimp returned to the zoo “almost immediately.”
Back at the zoo, one of the chimpanzees — Ripley — went back into his cage.
“He went back to the place where he felt the most safe, I’m assuming,” Schlueter said.
But zoo workers and law enforcement officials couldn’t get the other three male chimps, who were at the opposite end of the zoo, to join him.
Schlueter said he tried to pacify the chimps with a zoo tranquilizer gun, hitting two of them, but even after five minutes, the tranquilizers had not taken effect on the animals.
“That’s when the decision was made,” said Schlueter, who ended up shooting the three loose chimps with a deputy’s service revolver.
Monday, September 12, 2005
La. expects 'massive' wildlife habitat damage
Posted by Eric @ 11:59 PM
MSNBC.com | Environment: La. expects %u2018massive%u2019 wildlife habitat damage
I blogged recently on the impact to industrial agriculture and, more importantly, the hundreds of thousands of animals killed. This article covers the effect of Katrina on seafaring creatures, and the industry that preys upon them (excerpt):
“We’re going to see some massive destruction of the habitat in the coastal area when it deals with wildlife and with the fisheries,” Landreneau told Reuters.
*snip*
“With everything that is involved in dealing with the seafood industries, we’re going to have some very high numbers,” he said.
Louisiana provides as much as 40 percent of all seafood enjoyed in the United States, especially oysters and shrimp.
“We will do what we need to do to help those families that are involved in the seafood industry and also those businesses that are involved in recreational aspects,” Landreneau told an earlier news briefing.
(itals mine)
Wouldn't it be nice if they retrain them to do something that doesn't require the killing of animals? Unfortunately, I hear Tyson's aggressively courting victims of the hurricane who are desperate for work. I sure hope they have other options than to go work for Tyson. I've met a couple of people that have worked there, and neither of them had good things to say about the experience.
PETA award shines light on how a scientist's legacy is seen
Posted by Eric @ 10:58 PM
Post-Gazette.com | Science: PETA award shines light on how a scientist's legacy is seenThis article starts off talking about Herbert S. Rosenkranz, a pioneer in the field of computational toxicology (the use of computer programs to predict the toxicity of chemicals, reducing the need for animal testing), then discusses PETA's co-opting of his name for their $120,000 scientific award, as well as the various issues surrounding animal testing vs. computational toxicology, leading to this excerpt:
...scientists also are aware that animal testing is inadequate. If a mouse exposed to high levels of a chemical develops a cancer, that may well be reason to worry, but it by no means proves that it could cause cancer in humans at lower levels. And animal testing is so expensive and so time consuming that most chemicals in use today have never been fully tested.
Using computer models to predict toxicity based on a chemical's structure was seen by Rosenkranz and other "predictive toxicologists" as a way of speeding toxicity testing and perhaps improving upon the results available from animal testing.
"The computer-based model, if successful, would be a lot quicker and cheaper to ascertain whether the chemicals introduced into our society are safe," Goldstein said. But he also emphasized that eliminating or reducing the use of animals in toxicity testing wouldn't affect the need to use animals for studying disease and developing treatments.
Sandler, formerly an industrial hygienist with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, contended that many manufacturers are happy with the testing bottleneck created by reliance on animals because it makes it difficult for regulators to ban or restrict uses of chemicals.
Did some poking around to learn more about Katrina's impact on factory-farmed animals
Posted by Eric @ 5:12 AM
Star-Gazette.com | Local News: WATKINS GLEN Farm Sanctuary to get chickensHurray for Farm Sanctuary, once again. The article excerpted below mentions that thousands of chickens were killed. I have seen industry estimates that the hurricane and its aftermath have killed
hundreds of thousands of chickens, as well as destroying something like 10% of the U.S. chicken industry.
Rescue workers found thousands of dead chickens that had been dumped into a mass open grave, along with some live ones struggling to get out, Ritterbusch said.
Thousands of cattle have also died, and it's predicted that over half of Louisiana's cattle will perish (at least 100,000 cows), many from starvation and disease.
Insider's blogged account (w/pics) of animal rescues
Posted by Eric @ 4:24 AM
More information on how you can help
Posted by Eric @ 3:32 AM
E-mail me using the contact link to the right, and I will forward you a message from Kinship Circle with a vast amount of volunteer information you can use to see how you might be able to help the efforts on behalf of displaced animals in Mississippi and Louisiana.
URGENT: How you can help the animals still trapped in New Orleans
Posted by Eric @ 2:09 AM
I'm including an update from Karen Dawn later in this post that gives you great information on how you may be able to help, but first I wanted to catch you up on what's happening with the animals, as told by today's news (Karen catches you up on the last couple of days as well, with a key story at the end).
L.A. Times: Animal Refuge Strives to Corral Pets -- and DespairAnimal-care organizations from around the country have poured into Louisiana to assist in the rescue and care of pets and horses.
"We're trying to get a way to get more of them," said Kathryn Destreza, the director of New Orleans' Animal Services Department. "These people have lost everything, so if we can at least give them their dog or their horse, it won't be so bad."
Pets have become a hindrance for rescuers, as many survivors of the flood are refusing to leave deluged homes because they want to care for their animals. Many rescuers have stopped residents from coming aboard boats with their pets, and most evacuation shelters do not have facilities for animals.
Destreza said that animal rescue efforts could help persuade people to leave their homes.
The following is today's DawnWatch release. If there is anyway at all you can help, please do so. Or if you know someone who can, please forward this information at once. It's too late for some animals already, but there are many that can still be saved.
This is a combined alert, including information on the desperate need for help in the Hurricane Katrina Disaster region and an update on some of the weekend's media stories (9/10-9/11) and suggestions for letters to the editor.
First -- I have spoken with Mark Garrison, whose wife, Jane Garrison, is in New Orleans, rescuing animals. She is the activist who was featured in the Los Angeles Times story on the issue on Thursday September 8 (Katrina's Aftermath; Time Is Running Out for Stranded Pets.) Jane says there is a desperate need for more people in the region to help. People are needed to go in and get the starving animals out, do food and water drops for those who cannot yet be removed, and to care for animals that have been removed to holding facilities. At first only trained emergency rescue people were being sought, but as holding sites fill up with animals, there are not enough people to do basic jobs such as feeding, watering and walking the animals. Sometimes animals, with nobody to get them out of cages, are sleeping in their own feces. The need for help is urgent.
I have acquired from HSUS various forms one must fill out and fax back in order to work with the HSUS team, including a form that releases the organization from liability, since some of the work is dangerous. The forms ask when you were last vaccinated against tetanus and hepatitis A -- it may be necessary to have those vaccinations for some of the work. And the forms provide directions and a list of supplies one should bring. I am happy to forward those forms to anybody who wishes to go help.
Also, I have received an ASPCA alert calling for boats, which are desperately needed by rescuers. 12-15 foot flat bottom boats with outboard motors are ideal, but the alert suggests that boats of any kind are needed immediately. If you have any way of getting a boat to the rescue teams, please do. The alert says, "The staging area is in Gonzales LA. Lamar-Dixon Horse Expo Center 9039 Saint Landry Rd. From Baton Rouge > I-10 Eastbound as though driving to New Orleans > Head for the city of Gonzales > Exit 177 (Tanger Mall and Lamar Dixon Center) Report to the ASPCA volunteer center ASAP. And the alert concludes, "PLEASE GIVE THIS WIDEST DISSEMINATION IN ANY WAY YOU CAN AS WE ARE OUT OF TIME."
Best Friends, the UTAH sanctuary, has two boats on the water and a sanctuary in the region. Michael Mountain tells me that tomorrow their website will have detailed information as to the various ways people can help. www.BestFriends.org
Here is an update on some media coverage:
Larry King interviewed Wayne Pacelle, president of the Humane Society of the United States, and Michael Feinstein, a spokesperson for the ASPCA, on CNN's Larry King Live, Saturday, September 10. Please express your appreciation to King. Larry King takes comments at http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5.html?12
The Sunday, September 11, New York Times, includes a column by John Leland (section 4, page 3) headed, "Dogs Are People, Too."
He writes, "As reactions to the Katrina rescue efforts have been divided along lines of class, race and political party, they have also highlighted another schism: between dog haves and dog have-nots. Animal owners around the country have responded with outpourings of sympathy, hurt and outrage: How could rescue workers have barred pets from helicopters and shelters?"
You can read the whole column on line at: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/11/weekinreview/11leland.html
Supportive letters should go to letters@nytimes.com
The Sunday, September 11, Los Angeles Times, has a big story on the issue, pg A33, headed, "Animal Refuge Strives to Corral Pets -- and Despair." You'll find it on line at: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-animals11sep11,1,6464227.story
You can send a letter to the editor at letters@latimes.com
On Saturday, September 10, the Chicago Tribune included a front page story that should be compulsory reading for armchair activists. It is headed, "Public howling turns tide for four-legged evacuees."
It told us:
"Heartbreaking stories about people being forced to leave pets behind--and estimates that 50,000 dogs and cats were stranded in Hurricane Katrina's wake--have filled Internet message boards. On Thursday, an urgent message told of 150 dogs on the rooftop of American Can Corp. in New Orleans, another of a man rescued through his roof who had to leave his dog and two cats with no food or water.
"Pet lovers throughout the country have joined in a massive effort to organize veterinarians, boats and food to help save displaced animals. Convoys have been coordinated through message boards at nola.com, petfinder.com and craigslist.org. And on Friday, authorities in Louisiana who have struggled for nearly two weeks to save human lives in this devastated swampland started making more time for the animals.
"The military began providing animal cages and equipment to homeowners who would evacuate only if they could bring their pets with them. 'We got the capacity,' said Army Lt. Gen. Russel Honore, 'and it seemed like the right thing to do.'"
Illuminating the difference one person can make, and the power those of us who are not in the disaster region have on our computers and on the phone, the article tells us: "The military's edict on pets answers a petition drive started by Margaret Barry, 64, of Webster, Mass., demanding that an evacuation order include pets. By Friday, she had collected 40,000 signatures."
You can read the article on line at:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0509100056sep10,1,6901925.story
On that page you will see shocking photos of emaciated animals, highlighting the desperate need for immediate help in the region -- the animals are starting to die.
Finally, an Associated Press story, appearing in many papers including on the front page of the Saturday, September 10 Chicago Tribune, ("U.S. recalls FEMA chief") quotes Michael Brown, who has been removed from his post as head of Gulf Coast relief efforts:
"I'm going to go home and walk my dog and hug my wife, and maybe get a good Mexican meal and a stiff margarita and a full night's sleep. And then I'm going to go right back to FEMA and continue to do all I can to help these victims."
With letters to the editor we can point out the disgraceful irony, given FEMA's animal policies, in Brown's acknowledgment that the comfort of walking his dog is high on his priority list.
Letters to the editor are part of the "public howling" that makes a difference.
The Chicago Tribune takes letters at http://tinyurl.com/4lsug
And please send letters to the editor to your local papers, and call your local media and politely encourage them to cover this angle of the disaster.
Always include your full name, address, and daytime phone number when sending a letter to the editor.
Yours and the animals',
Karen Dawn
(DawnWatch is an animal advocacy media watch that looks at animal issues in the media and facilitates one-click responses to the relevant media outlets. You can learn more about it, and sign up for alerts at http://www.DawnWatch.com. To unsubscribe, go to www.DawnWatch.com/unsubscribe.php. If you forward or reprint DawnWatch alerts, please do so unedited -- leave DawnWatch in the title and include this tag line.)
Angelenos, tune in on Tuesday evening (or record)
Posted by Eric @ 2:03 AM
I received this e-mail from Madeleine Bistro:
Madeleine Bistro will be featured this Tuesday, September 13, 2005 at 6:00
or 6:30 pm on 9 on the Town, on KCAL 9 TV.
From 9 on the Town web site...
Top 9 Vegan Restaurants
They're sexy... they're sultry... they're vegan? Sky Valencia and her
Vegan Vixens take us on a tour of the top 9 vegetarian restaurants in town.
Discover the flavor without the guilt with these meat free dishes. It's
healthy... It's tasty... And it's cruelty free!
Additionally, the Los Angeles Times Food Section is scheduled to include a
story on the restaurant in this Wednesday's edition. Check it out!
9 on the Town Web Site
http://9onthetown.com/
According to their website, this show airs at
6:30pm, FYI. I'm curious to know what the Vegan Vixens think are the Top 9... I'll report back later.
Sunday, September 11, 2005
Best Friends Need Shelter, Too
Posted by Eric @ 3:15 AM
Best Friends Need Shelter, Too:
Still on my break in Arizona, but I wanted to get to my computer to fill everyone in on this. Karen Dawn has an Op-Ed in Saturday's Washington Post (excerpt):
Red Cross shelters that do not have animal-friendly areas, or do not coordinate with humane groups to make sure that there are animal shelters nearby, are out of touch with the needs of a society in which 60 percent of families have pets and many view them as intrinsic members of the family.
Friday, September 09, 2005
Veganism on FX's "Starved"
Posted by Eric @ 1:36 PM
FX: StarvedWhile An Animal-Friendly Life is focused primarily on animal issues and less on veganism in and of itself, veganism is a lifestyle specifically chosen by people wishing to live a more animal-friendly life, and that makes it a frequent subject in my blog. I will cover veganism in the media and in life, as appropriate, and especially when animal issues are involved in the story, as was the case in FX's "Starved."
On the show, Sam (Eric Schaeffer, also the show's writer/director) is an anorexic, compulsive over-eater. In last night's episode, he tells his vegan girlfriend, Shanti, that he wants to go vegan, too. Mainly to lose weight, which is not an uncommon approach for some teens, unfortunately. But the main reason I brought this up was because of the ethical underpinnings of Shanti's veganism. When Sam kills a bug right after telling her he's going vegan, she explains to him that bugs are sentient just like people and horses. And, BTW, Shanti is G-O-R-G-E-O-U-S, radiant and energetic, and generally a positive portrayal of veganism. The next time he sees a bug, while compulsively eating what I can only guess are vegan brownies (This is the first episode I've seen... I didn't even realize the vegan character of Shanti had been on in prior episodes), he traps it with a glass and a magazine and tosses it through a window instead of smashing it. He's still a bit disgusted to be near the insect, but soon he is approaching his entire life with more positivity.
Now this is a comedy, and it does go a bit over the top. At a support group meeting, he says "Thank you. I love you" to the group leader, who has just verbally abused him, then eats lettuce out of his jacket pocket after the meeting while talking to his friends. In the next scene, at the gym, he says the same phrase to a woman who he has despised for six years and explains that he's greeting everyone he doesn't like that way from now on. He apologizes for resenting her all this time, etc. In other words he is almost compulsively honest now. The woman gives him a really difficult time, and he eventually snaps, but he tries to maintain the positivity. After his yoga class with Shanti, he walks out with a head of broccoli in his hand (where he got, who knows, but it
is all a bit over the top).
Later, Sam calls his mom to bring Shanti over so his parents can meet her, and lets her know as he's hanging up that they're vegan. Right after that, Shanti notices pieces of the "rescued" water bug on the cabinet and questions Sam about it. She takes him to task for his rescue methods, and he tries to smooth it over. Next scene is Shanti giving the waterbug a karmic funeral ceremony. She tells him that to restore his karma, Sam has to find a sick bug and bring it back to health... I guess how over the top this is depends on how much you believe in karma.
At dinner with the parents, he quite handily turns down the cheese, which his mom had spent "all day making." His parents are pretty eccentric by most standards, and he also turns down a cake, but he's starting to get stressed by all the activity, including a dog that won't stop barking. Then his mother goes to flatten a bug, and he tries to intervene. The bug is "half dead," so his Mom says she should just finish it off, but he stops her, and Shanti calls it instant karma. She tells him this is his opportunity. They put the bug in an aquarium and even feed it some vegan cake. (They really look more like brownies... mmm, vegan brownies)
In the bathroom, he spots another waterbug. He spares it, but it seems clear that it's only because Shanti's present. When he steps on the scale to find he's
gained 3 pounds (from eating too much vegan cake), he starts rolling up a magazine. He smashes the bug with a "Thank you. I love you." Then finds and kills another. And another. He goes on a spree, to satisfy his "bloodlust." Again, it goes over the top. Unaware of his spree, Shanti "rewards" him for all his "good deeds." It looks like this storyline will carry over into the next episode. So tune in to FX next Thursday night, if you get that channel.
This episode actually demonstrates a couple of things. One, a lot of people are influenced into veganism through a significant other. Coming to the decision this way doesn't always happen for the purest of reasons. The same is even more consistent and true of people who choose veganism for dietary reasons, especially those with eating disorders. For "health vegans," veganism could be just another passing diet that doesn't end up working for them (as portrayed in the extreme by Sam). Without the ethical foundations of veganism, the respect for all creatures espoused by Shanti, one is really only out for one's self, and will continue to make self-serving decisions.
Now, Shanti's portrayal was relatively respectful, but she does come off a bit hippie-ish. I'm not sure how much of this is the actor's natural presence (warm, sweet, even beatific) how much of it is the script, and how much of it is in the performance. It's a perfectly legitimate characterization, though a fringe portrayal. I'm sure there are vegans out there like her, and it's one of the more positive portrayals I've seen on screen, if for no other reason than she looks amazing and is extremely compassionate.
As concerned as I was when I first read that a comedic show about people with eating disorders was going to deal with veganism, it was handled much better than I expected. It's a tough balance finding the comedy in life without one-dimensionally denegrating the subject of your humor. I think Eric Schaeffer did a fairly decent job in this episode of preventing the humor from mocking veganism, and for that he has my respect.
Effective Activism
Posted by Eric @ 3:10 AM
In case you're too short on time to listen to a 10 min.
podcast (MP3):
Turning animal exploiters into victims through in-your-face and/or violent activism = bad for the animals in the overall scheme of things
Reaching out to the mainstream peacefully and inclusively to identify shared values for more focused outreach = good for the animals in the overall scheme of things
There. Now a
podcast (AAC) that already over-simplified a major issue facing our movement has been further over-simplified!
Thursday, September 08, 2005
Animal Activists Toughen Tactics
Posted by Eric @ 7:32 PM
Los Angeles Times: Animal Activists Toughen TacticsMilitant animal activists (disparagingly termed animal rights extremists by those involved in fear-based politics) seem to be getting a lot of coverage this year, presumably as a result of heightened terrorism awareness. I'm not a fan of these tactics myself, as I agree with a statement toward the end of this article:
'...they're not using what I consider a constructive way to get their message across.'
I verbally sparred a bit with Pamelyn Ferdin at AR2005, and I know that she has very little concern for how people perceive activists. Much like it is stated in the article, (non-human) animals are her constituency, not people. I think that as soon as you set up a people vs. the animals dialectic dilemma, most people will choose their own species over all the others. Go figure.
What we need in the animal rights movement is a message of inclusiveness, not alienation. I will talk about this some more in a podcast very soon.
Pets or Meat?
Posted by Eric @ 7:23 PM
Metroactive Dining | Silicon Veggie: Pets or Meat?I've blogged about
Silicon Veggie before. Writer Elisa Camahort, who has posted here in the comments section on occasion (Hi, Elisa), tackles that imaginary/arbitrary line between pets and food in her recent column (9/7/05). Hey, Elisa, why don't they put the date of your column on the page itself?
Elisa begins
Pets or Meat? by discussing what great pets chickens actually make. Despite the Carl's Jr. ad, chickens are good for more than just sandwiches. This is my favorite quote from the column, regarding egg production, from pet chicken owner, Cheryl Potter:
It doesn't take an animal rights activist to say 'This is wrong.'
Well said.
New Orleans Animals more prominent in the media
Posted by Eric @ 5:16 PM
Kudos to all the activists and caring people who have pushed the media to cover this important part of the story, to the people in the media that have been covering this angle from the beginning, and especially to those groups who rolled up their sleeves and dived in to help as quickly as they could.
Here's just a handful of the many updates:
CNN has a number of Windows Media Player 9 videos of pet rescues available from its home page right now (search for "pet" in the Video player that opens in a new window, and you will find a number of rescue videos). Anderson Cooper has been covering the animal angle for a while now, too, including a piece I saw this morning about a legally blind woman who had stayed behind rather than be evacuated without her service dog.
Los Angeles Times: Time Is Running Out for Stranded PetsU.S. Newswire: IFAW Says Scores of Pets Rescued from Homes in New OrleansOngoing
DawnWatch coverage of the issue in the media:
OPRAH (9/6/05) and LARRY KING LIVE (9/8/05) ON IMPACT OF KATRINA ANIMAL POLICIESCOVERAGE OF KATRINA ANIMALS - CNN, OPRAH, GOOD MORNING AMERICA, LOS ANGELES TIMES, NY TIMES 9/7-9/8/05
Oprah's been in the news for her coverage of Katrina's aftermath...
Posted by Eric @ 2:28 AM
This is a Quicktime video clip that I've been hearing about a lot.
Warning, this is rather moving. Karen Dawn wrote about it in a recent e-mail:
Oprah's Katrina special on Tuesday, September 6, had a touching segment about animals.
Nate Berkus is a designer who is a regular on the Oprah show. He is no stranger to this type of tragedy, having been in the midst of the Tsunami and having lost his partner to it. He is down in New Orleans with the Oprah team.
Berkus says to the camera: "One of the saddest things about what's going on here, that people have saved their animals by putting them on rafts and keeping them out of the water. And now they're here and they're not allowed to take their dogs with them on the buses."
We see shots of beautiful dogs running around a mostly abandoned bus area, including a Chihuahua who could almost have fit in somebody's pocket.
We see a young man sitting and clutching an older rusty colored dog, who looks like a chow mix. He is crying. Another man, with his arm around him says, "We've been waiting here for days for everybody to go with everybody else, so we can get on with the dog, and then they just told us at the last minute we can't take the dog. Well, this guy and his dog rescued me off my roof. He's only 24, and he's had the dog for 14 years. Well, we're not leaving without the dog. We don't know what we're going to do."
Berkus says, "All right, guys. You know what? I'm not doing this for the camera. We don't give a (censored) about that."
(Note: Swearing can be a good way to make sure a piece doesn't make the show, so I think Berkus was sincere, but I am glad the producers decided to show the segment anyway.)
Berkus says, "We have a solution for you. Here's the story. We are going to send the dog," whose name, he learns, is Rafiki. "We're going to take him and two other dogs that we met here, and we're going to send him to a house in Baton Rouge. It's a private house where we're sleeping. And when you get back..."
At this point the young man collapses into Nate Berkus's arms, sobbing. Nate also begins to sob. The accompanying man is saying, "I told you it was going to be OK. I told you.."
Then we go to Oprah, who is in the announcer role. She is crying and says, "I've been crying for two days here, but I have to tell you, I'm a dog person, and that's pretty moving. Nate kept his word to Patrick and he and his beloved dog Rafiki were reunited the next day."
We see a shot of Patrick and Rafiki happily united and snuggled together on a bench-swing in a clean dry yard.
Nothing brings home a message like a personal story, and this one clearly showed the impact that the no-pet policies have had on people. Please thank Oprah for the coverage:
http://www.oprah.com/email/tows/email_tows_main.jhtml
I send thanks to Lori Golden from the Pet Press for making sure we knew about the Oprah coverage.
And here is good news. Thursday night, September 8, Wayne Pacelle, president of the Humane Society of the United States, will be on Larry King Live (9pm and midnight Eastern, and 6 and 9pm Pacific) talking about the tragedy that results from evacuation strategies that do not include people's beloved animal companions. Watch if you can. Larry King Live asks for comments on the show. After the piece has aired, please post a thank you.
The URL is http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5.html?12
Yours and the animals',
Karen Dawn
(DawnWatch is an animal advocacy media watch that looks at animal issues in the media and facilitates one-click responses to the relevant media outlets. You can learn more about it, and sign up for alerts at http://www.DawnWatch.com. To unsubscribe, go to www.DawnWatch.com/unsubscribe.php. If you forward or reprint DawnWatch alerts, please do so unedited -- leave DawnWatch in the title and include this tag line.)
Gulf Coast Fishermen Hope Katrina Spared Sea Life
Posted by Eric @ 12:46 AM
Wednesday, September 07, 2005
Human welfare should be first
Posted by Eric @ 2:35 AM
The BG News: Human welfare should be first
Here's a BGSU student who must have been given a debate assignment that somehow got repurposed as an opinion piece in the campus newspaper... How else to explain such an extreme (albeit weak) defense of a statement? You'll find a lot of people to agree with the title of the commentary, but you'll lose most of 'em by taking a fantastic leap and stating that human welfare presupposes the extinction of animals: "If whalers whale and they end up extinct, why does it matter?"
Putting aside for a moment the humorous grammatical mistake (I imagine a great many people would be just fine with whalers become extinct), this is just plain dumb. Read my Tom Regan quote at the top of this page, for starters.
What's annoying is that it doesn't usually take a well-reasoned argument for those people who already agree with D.J. Johnson to nod their heads and grunt in agreement as they dip back into their bucket of KFC. So, if you feel up to it, post a rebuttal at the bottom of the writer's column. Remind everyone who reads that page that our circle of compassion should extend to encompass all creatures (to paraphrase Einstein).
Tuesday, September 06, 2005
More on vat-grown meat
Posted by Eric @ 6:35 PM
Satya: From Fiction to ForkExcerpt from one of my all-time favorite magazines:
“Our goal in starting New Harvest was to advance the development of meat substitutes, which can address much of the harm done to human health, the environment, and animal welfare by meat production and consumption,” says researcher Jason Matheny. “There are already some very compelling meat substitutes on the market, and I expect in the next decade, they’ll get even better. One of our board members, Fu-hung Hsieh, is at the forefront of developing new soy-based substitutes, and the textures he’s able to produce in his lab are amazing.”
If successful, the impact of in vitro meat on the environment alone could be enormous, reducing the greenhouse gases and methane generated by industrial animal agriculture. In July, British physicist Alan Calverd argued that animals raised for human consumption emit 21 percent of all the carbon dioxide that can be attributed to human activity, and thus going vegetarian could help control global warming. Dutch officials are taking cultured meat so seriously that they have given a grant to New Harvest scientist Henk Haagsman, a professor at Utrecht University’s Division of Public Health and Food Safety in the Netherlands, to produce it. But according to Dr. Haagsman, New Harvest is a long way from yielding anything consumers can try. “Products will probably not be on the market before 2012,” he says.
Visit the article to read opinions from Paul Shapiro and Tom Regan.
Realize that farm animals would still be needed to source cell cultures on the scale needed to feed large populations this type of meat, and it certainly would not solve the much bigger cruelty problems caused by egg production, but it would certainly be conducive to dismantling factory farms involving animals "raised" for meat. Those cells could instead be extracted from animals raised on family farms restored in the wake of diminished demand for factory-farmed food. Wishful thinking, perhaps, but made all the more realistic by stories such as this.
Conservationists warn great apes face extinction
Posted by Eric @ 2:38 PM
SignOnSanDiego.com | News | World: Conservationists warn great apes face extinction
We should soon be seeing a "Declaration on Great Apes" from some 600 delegates at a conference in the Kinshashan capital of Congo. Hopefully that will draw more attention to an ongoing tragedy:
In a 2002 survey of 24 protected areas in Africa and Southeast Asia, great ape populations were found to be declining in 96 percent of the sites.
'It can be asserted that today ... every one of the great ape species is at high risk of extinction, either in the immediate future or at best within 50 years,' the United Nations said in its Global Strategy for the Survival of the Great Apes.
Genetic mapping to give thoroughbreds winning edge
Posted by Eric @ 2:29 PM
Reuters.co.uk: Genetic mapping to give thoroughbreds winning edge
Here's a telling quote about the horse-racing industry in an article about using genetic mapping to create the perfect racing horse (doesn't that defeat the whole nature of racing, anyway?):
"Quite a number of horses never make it to the track because they break down in training."
This contrasts pointedly with the many quotes on record that racing horses are more or less pampered.
Article: Animal rights vs animal research
Posted by Eric @ 2:16 AM
Fairfax New Zealand Limited: Animal rights vs animal research:
Here's an article that pits AR versus researchers. It even seems to attempt a certain level of balance, but still can't get around biased writing, confusing vegans with militant activists for one, which helps make veganism sound radical. Lots of other telling adjectives and verbs betray writer Anna Claridge's bias against animal activists, who evidently "dump" dogs after they've rescued them from labs, break-ins she equates to "stunts."
Animal rights activists "spout" AR "rhetoric." Militant activists are guilty of "spin." There's quite a few examples of this, and you'll no doubt catch when you see it, so read this with a critical eye.
I did like this, though:
...Guilford is even facing dissension in the ranks. This year, for the first time, a Massey University veterinary-science student refused to perform surgery on an animal.
Woo-hoo! Yay for the student. It's only a matter of time when more veterinary-science students follow this lead and schools are forced to be more creative about how they educate their students.
There's a few little tidbits like that in here that do make this article worth your time. Check it out and hit the Comments link below to let everyone know what you think. You may also want to write to the editor, especially if you live in beautiful New Zealand.
AAFL sees more page views per day than I had expected when I first started the site, so with some of you lookie-loos joining in, we could probably get some more good conversations going in the Comments section. Big thumbs-up to those of you who already have and continue to do so. The site is improved every time you join in with your thoughts.
Sunday, September 04, 2005
Deceit of the Raven
Posted by Eric @ 11:17 PM
New York Times: Deceit of the Raven
More scientific support for the intelligence of animals, in a creature some people might least expect (how often have we heard the phrase "dumb as a bird"?). Of course, these studies come from through animals in captivity, but that does not invalidate their findings. Here's an excerpt:
Last year, in the journal Animal Cognition, the behavioral biologist Thomas Bugnyar described a twist in an experiment he was conducting with laboratory ravens. The birds' job was to find bits of cheese hidden in film canisters, then pry open the lids to get the food out. One raven, Hugin, was best at this, but a dominant bird, Munin, would rush over and steal his reward.
So Hugin changed his strategy: when the other bird came over, he went to empty canisters, pried them open and pretended to eat. While the dominant bird poked around in the wrong place, Hugin zipped back to where the food really was. He was deceiving Munin.
To do that, Hugin had to grasp that ''what I know'' and ''what he knows'' are different. He had to understand, on some level, that other ravens have their own individual perceptions, feelings and plans, just as he does. It was big news when scientists found evidence that apes could grasp this. That some birds can as well is even more remarkable.
Katrina survivors upset over pets left behind
Posted by Eric @ 8:07 PM
MSNBC: Katrina survivors upset over pets left behindI'm don't live on the Internet or anything, but I
am on quite a bit, and it seems that I am starting to see more, sympathetic coverage of the animals and their affected familes in the mainstream media this weekend. There's even a video in the right sidebar showing Noah's Wish at work in New Orleans.
I can't help but think this increased media attenntion is in part due to the behind-the-scenes efforts of great organizations like HSUS, Noah's Wish, and Kinship Circle, which started a media blitz for the animals through its mailing list. Kinship Circle sent a message, with Merritt Clifton, Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE, to over 200 television news contacts. If you're already a member of their list, you've probably seen their message about this, along with ways to get involved. If not, visit
Kinship Circle to sign up for the mailing list.
This is fairly sad excerpt from the article, though not for all the animals, fortunately:
At the hospital, a doctor euthanized some animals at the request of their owners, who feared they would be abandoned and starve to death. He set up a small gas chamber out of a plastic-wrapped dog kennel.
"The bigger dogs were fighting it. Fighting the gas. It took them longer. When I saw that, I said 'I can't do it,'" said Bennett's husband, Lorne.
Valerie Bennett left her dogs with the anesthesiologist, who promised to care for about 30 staff members' pets on the roof of the hospital, Lindy Boggs Medical Center.
"He said he'd stay there as long as he possibly could," Valerie Bennett recalled, speaking from her husband's bedside at Atlanta's Emory University Hospital.
On Saturday afternoon, she said she saw a posting on a Web site called petfinder.com that said the anesthesiologist was still caring for the animals.
Here are some other articles published on the subject today:What of the pets lost, left behind after Katrina?Not all victims humanNew Orleans' animals suffering in aftermath of Katrina
Another way to help the animals while helping Katrina's victims
Posted by Eric @ 4:03 AM
Food for Life Global - the world's largest vegan/vegetarian food reliefLATEST NEWS: Food for Life has a team cooking and serving hot vegetarian meals to needy families, from their farm in Carriere, Mississippi.
Food for Life Global is now arranging for truckloads of supplies and equipment to expand these operations. Donations of grains, oil, dried fruits, potatoes, nuts and vegetables are most welcome. We have set up a special fund for the exclusive purpose of supporting Hurricane Katrina relief efforts. People wishing to donate food or equipment, please contact FFL Disaster Relief Office.
Winston unveils 'life-saving' pig organ research
Posted by Eric @ 1:42 AM
Scotsman.com News | Sci-Tech: Winston unveils 'life-saving' pig organ researchThis is not the beginning of the article, but I thought I'd start off the quote with a doozy:
(Professor Robert) Winston said: 'Ninety per cent of people in this country eat animals as food and almost all of us wear them on our feet. I think using them as a source for organs to provide life for people is perfectly acceptable.'
Ah, good ol' majority rule. Ethics by status quo. Just how the, er, status quo likes 'em.
More:
...news of Wintson's Home Office licence has alarmed some animal rights groups, who fear the research is exploiting animals for spare body parts.
John Robbins, from Animal Concern, said: 'This is one animal rights issue where the animal welfare aspect comes secondary to the danger to humans.
'Work like this only bridges the human-animal divide and increases the chance of diseases crossing between species.
'For every successful genetically modified animal, there are hundreds born disfigured or die at birth, and that is what makes this research ethically questionable.'
A spokeswoman for the SSPCA added: 'The topic of using animals for transplant organs is extremely emotive.
'We can understand concerns about specifically breeding animals for spare parts.'
Transplantation experts also warned using pigs to supply human organs might not be as simple as removing antigens from the organs' surface.
John Forsythe, a consultant surgeon at the Renal Transplant Unit at Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, said: 'My experience has shown me that the immune system has ways of getting around the things we do to it.
'It has a built in redundancy that means it can flow around a problem rather like water round a stone used to dam a stream.
'Removing the antigens only deals with one problem, but it is a welcome area of research.
'One ethical problem may also be due to viruses in pigs that sit hidden in the genetics of pig cells.
'We don't know what would happen when these are transplanted with an organ into a human population. There needs to be more work done on it.
'In the meantime it is essential that more people volunteer to donate their organs in the event of their death.'
I certainly hope that more people do heed the call in this last paragraph. I can't imagine that there aren't enough potential human donors in the world to supply those in need of organs. While I'm no expert on the subject, my understanding is that not enough people make it known that they are willing organ donors, and far too few have even thought about it before it's too late.
If you haven't personally thought about this and made arrangements to donate your organs to those in need in the case your untimely demise, our current time of crisis in the wake of Hurricane Katrina offers an excellent opportunity for reflection on how we can help each other, not to mention animals. Remember, you can volunteer your organs. The animals cannot.
Saturday, September 03, 2005
Hurricane Katrina and the Animals
Posted by Eric @ 1:55 AM
Vegan.com: Help Erik Marcus raise money for Noah's Wish to rescue animals affected by Hurricane KatrinaI have been reading a lot of material on the Hurricane's effects, and most of them focus on people. No one animal-related article I've come across really has spurred me to write on the subject, as much as I've wanted to (although
this one was pretty decent, and included a photo of dogs being rescued).
But I know many of you have been concerned for the animals affected by this disaster as humans take the priority. I'm glad their are organizations to help fill the gap, and it seems the California organization,
Noah's Wish, is taking the most direct action to rescue animals affected by the flood. We know it's a daunting and dangerous task. Please consider helping them, if you haven't already.
Another way to help them out while exploring other ways to help animals in a meaningful way is to take Erik up on his offer, as discussed in his show notes for the latest Erik's Diner podcast:
I will be donating $5.00 to Noah's Wish for every copy of Meat Market purchased by Sunday Sept. 4th, from people using the Amazon.com link to the book on Vegan.com
My thoughts are with all innocent creatures affected by this disaster, regardless of species.
UCSD Scientists Propose Ethical And Scientific Guidelines For Study Of Captive Great Apes
Posted by Eric @ 1:47 AM
UCSD News Releases: UCSD Scientists Propose Ethical And Scientific Guidelines For Study Of Captive Great Apes
As long as we're discussing the issue of testing on animals... I'll call this...
encouraging:
The newest genome-mapping has shown that human beings and chimpanzees share more than 99 percent sequence identity in genes and proteins, while having accumulated more differences in the rest of their DNA. Indeed, the great apes – chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans – are now grouped with humans in the family Hominidae. Their close kinship to us makes them interesting to scientists, and research institutions, sanctuaries, zoos, private owners and the entertainment industry together house more than 2,000 great apes, most of them West African chimpanzees.
The UCSD scientists want to make sure that the biomedical community recognizes the great apes’ unique status as near-kin. “We have special ethical responsibilities towards captive great apes,” they say in the Sept. 1 issue of the journal Nature, in an article accompanying the formal publication of the chimpanzee genome. “They share traits -- including but not limited to, their genetic similarity to humans, the ability to use and modify tools and a sense of ‘self’ -- that justify this special status.”
Pascal Gagneux, James J. Moore and Ajit Varki of UCSD argue in Nature that “the study of great apes should follow ethical principles generally similar to those for current studies on human subjects who cannot give informed consent,” and they acknowledge the many grey areas that still perplex researchers.
It's an interesting press release. For instance, make what you will of this:
And, they assert, their concern is “not about animal ‘rights’ but about ethical and scientific challenges specific to great apes in captivity.”
I actually have to respect this:
“We will undoubtedly be accused of trying to stand on the proverbial slippery slope,” said Varki. “However, depending on one’s perspective, this particular slope can incline in either direction. Thus, this is exactly where we wish to be on this difficult ethical issue.”
The article goes on to point out the irony that this stand is being made as the apes are under
threat of extinction.
Friday, September 02, 2005
An in-depth look at a couple of animal rescuers
Posted by Eric @ 2:05 AM
LA Weekly | Features: 9 Lives and CountingThis might be too in-depth. L.A. Weekly articles tend to be really long, but it does give you a chance to get to know the subjects of these stories a lot better than you otherwise would, and that is definitely important in a case like this. I have to admit to knowing very little behind the stories of animal "hoarders" and those who have been arrested for failing to properly care for the many animals on their property. This story gives some insight into a few such individuals (excerpt):
(Dr. Gary) Patronek has little patience for common portrayals of animal hoarders as well-intentioned eccentrics.
“This is not about good intentions,” Patronek explains. “It’s about power and control, where the need to retain an animal supersedes the interest of that animal. There’s an enormous subconscious element; they don’t recognize the harm they’re doing even though it’s right in front of them, so it’s easy for a judge or a jury to accept at face value the good intentions. When you get underneath the surface, they’re not trying to rescue creatures at all. If an animal is being starved, it’s being starved.”
Patronek says the evidence suggests that the syndrome has roots in childhood, “a lack of stability in their lives so that animals were the only stable fixture they had, that they learned to rely on for support. Then, in adulthood, the chickens come home to roost, so to speak.”
Thursday, September 01, 2005
Appreciate animal-rights restraint
Posted by Eric @ 2:29 PM
OrlandoSentinel.com | Opinion: Appreciate animal-rights restraintThe debate continues:
Blumberg and his crybaby colleagues got off with broken computers, graffiti and subscriptions to Time and TV Guide. Instead of likening animal-rights activists to actual terrorists, they should be thanking them for their restraint.
Wow. That's pretty in your face. I think this guy's off the mark, personally. I've found when people tell you to appreciate the restraint of people who have performed violent acts, there's a hint of threat behind that:
It could be worse, buddy. That leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Here's the
original piece:
Terrorists, no matter what their cause, seek political change through violence and intimidation. Is it essential that we label animal-rights extremists as terrorists? Perhaps not, unless such a label helps us -- and especially politicians -- to better appreciate the seriousness of the threat and to marshal the necessary law-enforcement resources.
Blumberg goes on to call animal activists anti-science, which is preposterous, but seems like the only possibility when grasping at straws to explain behavior you don't understand when animals' lives are to you merely stock-in-trade.
Personally knowing people who experiment on animals, I can tell you that many of them are concerned about the animals and often have a hard time working with them, psychologically. They have to tell themselves all sorts of things in order to continue on. Think what this does to people, much less the animals imprisoned in these labs.
I'm encouraged that he had difficulty getting senators to be outraged over what happened. It is a serious issue, and these are tactics I can't condone, but animal experimentation is itself an outrage.
For the sake of all parties involved, more time, energy, and money should be spent on alternatives to animal research (and no money should be spent on frivolous research involving animals), not wasting it on lab break-ins and serial harassment. This applies to government funders, researchers, and those opposed to animal research. Being constructive with creative approaches will benefit everyone in the long run, while destructive activities (despite their short term rescues) result primarily in harm. The ends don't justify the means.
What have guinea pigs ever done for us?
Posted by Eric @ 2:19 AM
Guardian Unlimited | Life: What have guinea pigs ever done for us?The controversial subject of animal research has been receiving a lot of attention lately, thanks to animal rights activists. Of course, the attention has been mostly negative so far, and now I happen to stumble upon the home page of the UK's The Guardian newspaper, which linked to the following article from the top of their homepage with ad-like banners:


If you read some of the anti-vivisection websites, you could easily believe that there had been no benefits from animal research. Even the discovery of penicillin, tested on mice, which has indisputably saved millions of lives, is dismissed. Why? Because, it is claimed, penicillin is toxic to guinea pigs and rabbits and it was luck that made Oxford chemists Chain and Florey pick mice for their experiments. Should it negate the fact that without mice, a drug of enormous benefit to both humans and animals might never have been developed? Absolutely not. Nevertheless it remains controversial - last week a guinea pig farm was forced to close by animal rights protesters.
The piece details ten successful medical treatments for humans that were initially developed using animal models. Regardless of what you think about the benefits of animal research, remember that the animals aren't exactly
volunteering to help us out through the generosity of their better natures, and many of them suffer for no other reason than that they bear some semblance to man, which is only occasionally convenient for people to remember. Many are convinced that non-human animals have less worth than a human, other than their own use to humans, typically when it comes to making people money. While I personally have a difficult time arguing that animal research has
not benefitted humans, I am not really qualified to discuss it (though the recent
Vioxx verdict and withdrawal from the market points out the pitfalls of testing on animals before market and testing on people after a drug hits the market). As a human endowed with the faculty of thought, however, I never fail to be awed by our capacity to excuse and perpetrate barbarity when it serves our own ends. Some other words for thought:
"Atrocities are not less atrocities when they occur in laboratories and are called medical research." — George Bernard Shaw
"The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse... We have cured mice of cancer for decades -- and it simply didn't work in humans." — Dr. Richard Klausner, Director of the National Cancer Institute
I'm sure this issue will be much more complicated for me the next time I am the recipient of some drug or procedure that seems to have been discovered with the "help" of animals. Do I refuse antibiotics the next time I'm sick? Do I reject a donated kidney?
Unlike factory farming, which at a steep ethical price provides us food we don't need and in fact may later require medical care developed on animals, medical treatments may save more lives than they take away. Going back to the kill-or-be-killed nature in us all, many people prefer to sacrifice animals at the altar of science to improve their odds of survival in the game of life. Me, I'm going to focus the majority of my energy on the billions of animals bred for food and eat a plant-based diet, try to remain physically healthy, and to continue to work on my mental state through meditation, yoga, and whatever else I can control for myself, and hope that I can avoid most of the ills of our modern society that drive this demand for animal research in the first place.